Large-gap peripheral nerve repair using xenogeneic transplants in rhesus macaques

Paul Holzer, Elizabeth J. Chang, Kaitlyn Rogers, Jamie Tarlton, Diana Lu, Natasha Gillespie, Jon Adkins, Monica Metea, Alan LaRochelle, Joan Wicks, Buket Onel, Steve Gullans, Joshua C. Doloff, Linda Scobie, Curtis L. Cetrulo, Rod Monroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Surgical intervention is required to successfully treat severe, large-gap (≥4 cm) peripheral nerve injuries. However, all existing treatments have shortcomings and an alternative to the use of autologous nerves is needed. Human and porcine nerves are physiologically similar, with comparable dimensions and architecture, presence and distribution of Schwann cells, and conserved features of the extracellular matrix (ECM). We report the repair of fully transected radial nerves in 10 Rhesus Macaques using viable, whole sciatic nerve from genetically engineered (GalT-KO), designated pathogen free (DPF) porcine donors. This resulted in the regeneration of the transected nerve, and importantly, recovery of wrist extension function, distal muscle reinnervation, and recovery of nerve conduction velocities and compound muscle action potentials similar to autologous controls. We also demonstrate the absence of immune rejection, systemic porcine cell migration, and detectable residual porcine material. Our preliminary findings support the safety and efficacy of viable porcine nerve transplants, suggest the interchangeable therapeutic use of cross-species cells, and highlight the broader clinical potential of xenotransplantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12792
JournalXenotransplantation
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2023

Keywords

  • Xenotransplantation
  • peripheral nerve
  • tacrolimus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Large-gap peripheral nerve repair using xenogeneic transplants in rhesus macaques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this