Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience

Stephen C. Jacobs, Eugene Cho, Brian J. Dunkin, John L. Flowers, Eugene Schweitzer, Charles Cangro, Jeffrey Fink, Alan Farney, Benjamin Philosophe, Bruce Jarrell, Stephen T. Bartlett, John M. Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1494-1499
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume164
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Tissue Donors
Kidney
Living Donors
Intraoperative Complications
Allografts
Morbidity
Warm Ischemia
Urinary Retention
Hypesthesia
Ileus
Operative Time
Thigh
Medical Records
Analgesics
Volunteers
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • Kidney
  • Kidney transplantation
  • Laparoscopy
  • Living donor
  • Nephrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Jacobs, S. C., Cho, E., Dunkin, B. J., Flowers, J. L., Schweitzer, E., Cangro, C., ... Barry, J. M. (2000). Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience. Journal of Urology, 164(5), 1494-1499.

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy : The University of Maryland 3-year experience. / Jacobs, Stephen C.; Cho, Eugene; Dunkin, Brian J.; Flowers, John L.; Schweitzer, Eugene; Cangro, Charles; Fink, Jeffrey; Farney, Alan; Philosophe, Benjamin; Jarrell, Bruce; Bartlett, Stephen T.; Barry, John M.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 164, No. 5, 2000, p. 1494-1499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, SC, Cho, E, Dunkin, BJ, Flowers, JL, Schweitzer, E, Cangro, C, Fink, J, Farney, A, Philosophe, B, Jarrell, B, Bartlett, ST & Barry, JM 2000, 'Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience', Journal of Urology, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 1494-1499.
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience. Journal of Urology. 2000;164(5):1494-1499.
Jacobs, Stephen C. ; Cho, Eugene ; Dunkin, Brian J. ; Flowers, John L. ; Schweitzer, Eugene ; Cangro, Charles ; Fink, Jeffrey ; Farney, Alan ; Philosophe, Benjamin ; Jarrell, Bruce ; Bartlett, Stephen T. ; Barry, John M. / Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy : The University of Maryland 3-year experience. In: Journal of Urology. 2000 ; Vol. 164, No. 5. pp. 1494-1499.
@article{163b8f24a5aa4853902ae11a39f84644,
title = "Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience",
abstract = "Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5{\%}. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4{\%} of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.",
keywords = "Kidney, Kidney transplantation, Laparoscopy, Living donor, Nephrectomy",
author = "Jacobs, {Stephen C.} and Eugene Cho and Dunkin, {Brian J.} and Flowers, {John L.} and Eugene Schweitzer and Charles Cangro and Jeffrey Fink and Alan Farney and Benjamin Philosophe and Bruce Jarrell and Bartlett, {Stephen T.} and Barry, {John M.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "164",
pages = "1494--1499",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

T2 - The University of Maryland 3-year experience

AU - Jacobs, Stephen C.

AU - Cho, Eugene

AU - Dunkin, Brian J.

AU - Flowers, John L.

AU - Schweitzer, Eugene

AU - Cangro, Charles

AU - Fink, Jeffrey

AU - Farney, Alan

AU - Philosophe, Benjamin

AU - Jarrell, Bruce

AU - Bartlett, Stephen T.

AU - Barry, John M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.

AB - Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.

KW - Kidney

KW - Kidney transplantation

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Living donor

KW - Nephrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033793569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033793569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11025690

AN - SCOPUS:0033793569

VL - 164

SP - 1494

EP - 1499

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -