Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons

Analysis of hand technique and standing position

Yassar Youssef, Gyusung Lee, Carlos Godinez, Erica Sutton, Rosemary V. Klein, Ivan M. George, F. Jacob Seagull, Adrian Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: This study compares surgical techniques and surgeon's standing position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), investigating each with respect to surgeons' learning, performance, and ergonomics. Little homogeneity exists in LC performance and training. Variations in standing position (side-standing technique vs. between-standing technique) and hand technique (one-handed vs. two-handed) exist. Methods: Thirty-two LC procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator were video-recorded and analyzed. Each subject performed four different procedures: one-handed/side-standing, one-handed/between-standing, two-handed/side-standing, and two-handed/between- standing. Physical ergonomics were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Mental workload assessment was acquired with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Virtual reality (VR) simulator-generated performance evaluation and a subjective survey were analyzed. Results: RULA scores were consistently lower (indicating better ergonomics) for the between-standing technique and higher (indicating worse ergonomics) for the side-standing technique, regardless of whether one- or two-handed. Anatomical scores overall showed side-standing to have a detrimental effect on the upper arms and trunk. The NASA-TLX showed significant association between the side-standing position and high physical demand, effort, and frustration (p < 0.05). The two-handed technique in the side-standing position required more effort than the one-handed (p < 0.05). No difference in operative time or complication rate was demonstrated among the four procedures. The two-handed/between-standing method was chosen as the best procedure to teach and standardize. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a risk of physical injury to the surgeon. As LC is currently commonly performed in the United States, the left side-standing position may lead to increased physical demand and effort, resulting in ergonomically unsound conditions for the surgeon. Though further investigations should be conducted, adopting the between-standing position deserves serious consideration as it may be the best short-term ergonomic alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2168-2174
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Posture
Human Engineering
Hand
Wounds and Injuries
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Physical Exertion
Upper Extremity
Frustration
Operative Time
Workload
Surgeons
Arm
Learning

Keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Ergonomics
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • RULA
  • Surgical standing position
  • Technique
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons : Analysis of hand technique and standing position. / Youssef, Yassar; Lee, Gyusung; Godinez, Carlos; Sutton, Erica; Klein, Rosemary V.; George, Ivan M.; Jacob Seagull, F.; Park, Adrian.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 2168-2174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Youssef, Yassar ; Lee, Gyusung ; Godinez, Carlos ; Sutton, Erica ; Klein, Rosemary V. ; George, Ivan M. ; Jacob Seagull, F. ; Park, Adrian. / Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons : Analysis of hand technique and standing position. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 2168-2174.
@article{794e68ac68a44730b3493e69322ae3aa,
title = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: Analysis of hand technique and standing position",
abstract = "Background: This study compares surgical techniques and surgeon's standing position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), investigating each with respect to surgeons' learning, performance, and ergonomics. Little homogeneity exists in LC performance and training. Variations in standing position (side-standing technique vs. between-standing technique) and hand technique (one-handed vs. two-handed) exist. Methods: Thirty-two LC procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator were video-recorded and analyzed. Each subject performed four different procedures: one-handed/side-standing, one-handed/between-standing, two-handed/side-standing, and two-handed/between- standing. Physical ergonomics were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Mental workload assessment was acquired with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Virtual reality (VR) simulator-generated performance evaluation and a subjective survey were analyzed. Results: RULA scores were consistently lower (indicating better ergonomics) for the between-standing technique and higher (indicating worse ergonomics) for the side-standing technique, regardless of whether one- or two-handed. Anatomical scores overall showed side-standing to have a detrimental effect on the upper arms and trunk. The NASA-TLX showed significant association between the side-standing position and high physical demand, effort, and frustration (p < 0.05). The two-handed technique in the side-standing position required more effort than the one-handed (p < 0.05). No difference in operative time or complication rate was demonstrated among the four procedures. The two-handed/between-standing method was chosen as the best procedure to teach and standardize. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a risk of physical injury to the surgeon. As LC is currently commonly performed in the United States, the left side-standing position may lead to increased physical demand and effort, resulting in ergonomically unsound conditions for the surgeon. Though further investigations should be conducted, adopting the between-standing position deserves serious consideration as it may be the best short-term ergonomic alternative.",
keywords = "Endoscopy, Ergonomics, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, RULA, Surgical standing position, Technique, Training",
author = "Yassar Youssef and Gyusung Lee and Carlos Godinez and Erica Sutton and Klein, {Rosemary V.} and George, {Ivan M.} and {Jacob Seagull}, F. and Adrian Park",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-010-1517-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "2168--2174",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons

T2 - Analysis of hand technique and standing position

AU - Youssef, Yassar

AU - Lee, Gyusung

AU - Godinez, Carlos

AU - Sutton, Erica

AU - Klein, Rosemary V.

AU - George, Ivan M.

AU - Jacob Seagull, F.

AU - Park, Adrian

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Background: This study compares surgical techniques and surgeon's standing position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), investigating each with respect to surgeons' learning, performance, and ergonomics. Little homogeneity exists in LC performance and training. Variations in standing position (side-standing technique vs. between-standing technique) and hand technique (one-handed vs. two-handed) exist. Methods: Thirty-two LC procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator were video-recorded and analyzed. Each subject performed four different procedures: one-handed/side-standing, one-handed/between-standing, two-handed/side-standing, and two-handed/between- standing. Physical ergonomics were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Mental workload assessment was acquired with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Virtual reality (VR) simulator-generated performance evaluation and a subjective survey were analyzed. Results: RULA scores were consistently lower (indicating better ergonomics) for the between-standing technique and higher (indicating worse ergonomics) for the side-standing technique, regardless of whether one- or two-handed. Anatomical scores overall showed side-standing to have a detrimental effect on the upper arms and trunk. The NASA-TLX showed significant association between the side-standing position and high physical demand, effort, and frustration (p < 0.05). The two-handed technique in the side-standing position required more effort than the one-handed (p < 0.05). No difference in operative time or complication rate was demonstrated among the four procedures. The two-handed/between-standing method was chosen as the best procedure to teach and standardize. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a risk of physical injury to the surgeon. As LC is currently commonly performed in the United States, the left side-standing position may lead to increased physical demand and effort, resulting in ergonomically unsound conditions for the surgeon. Though further investigations should be conducted, adopting the between-standing position deserves serious consideration as it may be the best short-term ergonomic alternative.

AB - Background: This study compares surgical techniques and surgeon's standing position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), investigating each with respect to surgeons' learning, performance, and ergonomics. Little homogeneity exists in LC performance and training. Variations in standing position (side-standing technique vs. between-standing technique) and hand technique (one-handed vs. two-handed) exist. Methods: Thirty-two LC procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator were video-recorded and analyzed. Each subject performed four different procedures: one-handed/side-standing, one-handed/between-standing, two-handed/side-standing, and two-handed/between- standing. Physical ergonomics were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Mental workload assessment was acquired with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Virtual reality (VR) simulator-generated performance evaluation and a subjective survey were analyzed. Results: RULA scores were consistently lower (indicating better ergonomics) for the between-standing technique and higher (indicating worse ergonomics) for the side-standing technique, regardless of whether one- or two-handed. Anatomical scores overall showed side-standing to have a detrimental effect on the upper arms and trunk. The NASA-TLX showed significant association between the side-standing position and high physical demand, effort, and frustration (p < 0.05). The two-handed technique in the side-standing position required more effort than the one-handed (p < 0.05). No difference in operative time or complication rate was demonstrated among the four procedures. The two-handed/between-standing method was chosen as the best procedure to teach and standardize. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a risk of physical injury to the surgeon. As LC is currently commonly performed in the United States, the left side-standing position may lead to increased physical demand and effort, resulting in ergonomically unsound conditions for the surgeon. Though further investigations should be conducted, adopting the between-standing position deserves serious consideration as it may be the best short-term ergonomic alternative.

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Ergonomics

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - RULA

KW - Surgical standing position

KW - Technique

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960432566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960432566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-010-1517-9

DO - 10.1007/s00464-010-1517-9

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2168

EP - 2174

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 7

ER -