Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants

Gayan S. De Silva, David M. Krpata, Yue Gao, Cory N. Criss, James M. Anderson, Hooman Soltanian, Michael J. Rosen, Yuri W. Novitsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Biologic matrices used in abdominal wall reconstruction are purported to undergo remodeling into connective tissue resembling native collagen. Key steps in that process include inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, cellular penetration, and neovascularization of the matrix, followed by fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. We aimed to examine the concept of biologic mesh remodeling/regeneration in a series of explanted porcine biologic meshes. Materials and methods A cohort of patients who underwent removal of porcine biologic mesh was identified in a prospective database. Mesh/tissue samples were analyzed using standard hematoxylin/eosin and Masson's trichrome staining. Main outcome measures included: inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, foreign body reaction (FBR), cellular penetration, neovascularization, and new collagen deposition. All evaluations were performed by a blinded senior pathologist using established grading scales. Results A total of 14 cases with implant time ranging from 4 to 33 months were identified and analyzed. All meshes were placed as intraperitoneal underlay. There were 7 non-cross-linked and 7 cross-linked grafts. Cross-linked grafts were associated with mild FBR and moderate fibrous capsule formation. Similarly, non-cross-linked grafts had mild-to-moderate FBR and encapsulation. Furthermore, non-cross-linked grafts were associated with no neovascularization and minimal peripheral mesh neocellularization. Cross-linked grafts demonstrated neither neovascularization nor neocellularization. Although no grafts were associated with any quantifiable new collagen deposition within the porcine biologic matrix, minimal biodegradation/remodeling was observed at the periphery of the non-cross-linked grafts only. Conclusion The biologic behavior of porcine meshes is predicated on their ability to undergo mesh remodeling with resorption and new collagen deposition. In the largest series of human biologic explants, we detected no evidence of xenograft remodeling, especially in the cross-linked group. Although underlay mesh placement and other patient factors may have contributed to our findings, the concept of porcine biologic mesh regeneration does not seem to be prevalent in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-189
Number of pages7
JournalSurgery (United States)
Volume156
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Swine
Transplants
Foreign-Body Reaction
Collagen
Regeneration
Abdominal Wall
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Heterografts
Connective Tissue
Capsules
Fibroblasts
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Staining and Labeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

De Silva, G. S., Krpata, D. M., Gao, Y., Criss, C. N., Anderson, J. M., Soltanian, H., ... Novitsky, Y. W. (2014). Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants. Surgery (United States), 156(1), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011

Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants. / De Silva, Gayan S.; Krpata, David M.; Gao, Yue; Criss, Cory N.; Anderson, James M.; Soltanian, Hooman; Rosen, Michael J.; Novitsky, Yuri W.

In: Surgery (United States), Vol. 156, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 183-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Silva, GS, Krpata, DM, Gao, Y, Criss, CN, Anderson, JM, Soltanian, H, Rosen, MJ & Novitsky, YW 2014, 'Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants', Surgery (United States), vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011
De Silva, Gayan S. ; Krpata, David M. ; Gao, Yue ; Criss, Cory N. ; Anderson, James M. ; Soltanian, Hooman ; Rosen, Michael J. ; Novitsky, Yuri W. / Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants. In: Surgery (United States). 2014 ; Vol. 156, No. 1. pp. 183-189.
@article{0a08005fc8274bfea9fb2b56dcb5398c,
title = "Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants",
abstract = "Introduction Biologic matrices used in abdominal wall reconstruction are purported to undergo remodeling into connective tissue resembling native collagen. Key steps in that process include inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, cellular penetration, and neovascularization of the matrix, followed by fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. We aimed to examine the concept of biologic mesh remodeling/regeneration in a series of explanted porcine biologic meshes. Materials and methods A cohort of patients who underwent removal of porcine biologic mesh was identified in a prospective database. Mesh/tissue samples were analyzed using standard hematoxylin/eosin and Masson's trichrome staining. Main outcome measures included: inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, foreign body reaction (FBR), cellular penetration, neovascularization, and new collagen deposition. All evaluations were performed by a blinded senior pathologist using established grading scales. Results A total of 14 cases with implant time ranging from 4 to 33 months were identified and analyzed. All meshes were placed as intraperitoneal underlay. There were 7 non-cross-linked and 7 cross-linked grafts. Cross-linked grafts were associated with mild FBR and moderate fibrous capsule formation. Similarly, non-cross-linked grafts had mild-to-moderate FBR and encapsulation. Furthermore, non-cross-linked grafts were associated with no neovascularization and minimal peripheral mesh neocellularization. Cross-linked grafts demonstrated neither neovascularization nor neocellularization. Although no grafts were associated with any quantifiable new collagen deposition within the porcine biologic matrix, minimal biodegradation/remodeling was observed at the periphery of the non-cross-linked grafts only. Conclusion The biologic behavior of porcine meshes is predicated on their ability to undergo mesh remodeling with resorption and new collagen deposition. In the largest series of human biologic explants, we detected no evidence of xenograft remodeling, especially in the cross-linked group. Although underlay mesh placement and other patient factors may have contributed to our findings, the concept of porcine biologic mesh regeneration does not seem to be prevalent in the clinical setting.",
author = "{De Silva}, {Gayan S.} and Krpata, {David M.} and Yue Gao and Criss, {Cory N.} and Anderson, {James M.} and Hooman Soltanian and Rosen, {Michael J.} and Novitsky, {Yuri W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "183--189",
journal = "Surgery",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants

AU - De Silva, Gayan S.

AU - Krpata, David M.

AU - Gao, Yue

AU - Criss, Cory N.

AU - Anderson, James M.

AU - Soltanian, Hooman

AU - Rosen, Michael J.

AU - Novitsky, Yuri W.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Introduction Biologic matrices used in abdominal wall reconstruction are purported to undergo remodeling into connective tissue resembling native collagen. Key steps in that process include inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, cellular penetration, and neovascularization of the matrix, followed by fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. We aimed to examine the concept of biologic mesh remodeling/regeneration in a series of explanted porcine biologic meshes. Materials and methods A cohort of patients who underwent removal of porcine biologic mesh was identified in a prospective database. Mesh/tissue samples were analyzed using standard hematoxylin/eosin and Masson's trichrome staining. Main outcome measures included: inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, foreign body reaction (FBR), cellular penetration, neovascularization, and new collagen deposition. All evaluations were performed by a blinded senior pathologist using established grading scales. Results A total of 14 cases with implant time ranging from 4 to 33 months were identified and analyzed. All meshes were placed as intraperitoneal underlay. There were 7 non-cross-linked and 7 cross-linked grafts. Cross-linked grafts were associated with mild FBR and moderate fibrous capsule formation. Similarly, non-cross-linked grafts had mild-to-moderate FBR and encapsulation. Furthermore, non-cross-linked grafts were associated with no neovascularization and minimal peripheral mesh neocellularization. Cross-linked grafts demonstrated neither neovascularization nor neocellularization. Although no grafts were associated with any quantifiable new collagen deposition within the porcine biologic matrix, minimal biodegradation/remodeling was observed at the periphery of the non-cross-linked grafts only. Conclusion The biologic behavior of porcine meshes is predicated on their ability to undergo mesh remodeling with resorption and new collagen deposition. In the largest series of human biologic explants, we detected no evidence of xenograft remodeling, especially in the cross-linked group. Although underlay mesh placement and other patient factors may have contributed to our findings, the concept of porcine biologic mesh regeneration does not seem to be prevalent in the clinical setting.

AB - Introduction Biologic matrices used in abdominal wall reconstruction are purported to undergo remodeling into connective tissue resembling native collagen. Key steps in that process include inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, cellular penetration, and neovascularization of the matrix, followed by fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. We aimed to examine the concept of biologic mesh remodeling/regeneration in a series of explanted porcine biologic meshes. Materials and methods A cohort of patients who underwent removal of porcine biologic mesh was identified in a prospective database. Mesh/tissue samples were analyzed using standard hematoxylin/eosin and Masson's trichrome staining. Main outcome measures included: inflammatory response at the mesh/tissue interface, foreign body reaction (FBR), cellular penetration, neovascularization, and new collagen deposition. All evaluations were performed by a blinded senior pathologist using established grading scales. Results A total of 14 cases with implant time ranging from 4 to 33 months were identified and analyzed. All meshes were placed as intraperitoneal underlay. There were 7 non-cross-linked and 7 cross-linked grafts. Cross-linked grafts were associated with mild FBR and moderate fibrous capsule formation. Similarly, non-cross-linked grafts had mild-to-moderate FBR and encapsulation. Furthermore, non-cross-linked grafts were associated with no neovascularization and minimal peripheral mesh neocellularization. Cross-linked grafts demonstrated neither neovascularization nor neocellularization. Although no grafts were associated with any quantifiable new collagen deposition within the porcine biologic matrix, minimal biodegradation/remodeling was observed at the periphery of the non-cross-linked grafts only. Conclusion The biologic behavior of porcine meshes is predicated on their ability to undergo mesh remodeling with resorption and new collagen deposition. In the largest series of human biologic explants, we detected no evidence of xenograft remodeling, especially in the cross-linked group. Although underlay mesh placement and other patient factors may have contributed to our findings, the concept of porcine biologic mesh regeneration does not seem to be prevalent in the clinical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902536474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902536474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 24856669

AN - SCOPUS:84902536474

VL - 156

SP - 183

EP - 189

JO - Surgery

JF - Surgery

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 1

ER -