Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation

Lakhmir S. Chawla, Hasan Zia, Guillermo Gutierrez, Nevin M. Katz, Michael G. Seneff, Muhammed Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study objective: We compared paired samples of central venous O2 saturation (ScvO2) and mixed venous O2 saturation (Sv̄O2) to test the hypothesis that ScvO2 is equivalent to Sv̄O2. We also compared O2 consumption (V̇O2) computed with ScvO2 (V̇O2cv) to that computed with Sv̄O2 (V̇O2v). Design: Prospective, sequential, observational study. Setting: Combined medical-surgical ICU. Patients: Fifty-three individuals > 18 years of age of either sex who required a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to guide fluid therapy. Subjects were identified as postsurgical (32 patients) or medical (21 patients) according to their ICU admission diagnosis. Interventions: A PAC was inserted through the internal jugular or subclavian veins. Care was taken to place the PAC proximal port approximately 3 cm above the tricuspid valve. Blood samples were drawn from the proximal and distal ports in random order. An arterial blood sample also was drawn. Measurements: Cardiac output in triplicate, systemic pressure, and central pressure. We analyzed blood samples for hemoglobin concentration and O2 saturation (SO2). Data were compared by correlation analysis and by the method of Bland and Altman. Results: Sv̄O2 was consistently lower than ScvO2 (p <0.0001), with a mean (±SD) bias of -5.2 ± 5.1%. Similar differences in ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were present within each subgroup (p <0.001). A lower Sv̄O2 resulted in V̇O2v values that were higher than the V̇O2cv values for all patients in the study (mean V̇O2v, 236.7 ± 103.4 mL/min; mean V̇O2cv, 191.1 ± 84.0 mL/min; p <0.001) as well as for patients within each subgroup (p <0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were not equivalent in this sample of critically ill patients. Moreover, substituting ScvO2 for Sv̄O2 in the calculation of V̇O2 produced unacceptably large errors. The decrease in SO2 between ScvO2 to Sv̄O2 may result from the mixing of atrial and coronary sinus blood. As such, this difference may be a marker of myocardial O2 consumption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1891-1896
Number of pages6
JournalChest
Volume126
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxygen
Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
Pressure
Subclavian Vein
Vascular Access Devices
Tricuspid Valve
Coronary Sinus
Fluid Therapy
Jugular Veins
Critical Illness
Cardiac Output
Observational Studies
Hemoglobins

Keywords

  • Central venous oxygenation
  • Coronary sinus
  • Mixed venous oxygenation
  • Monitoring
  • Myocardial metabolism
  • Oxygen consumption
  • Oxygen delivery
  • Pulmonary artery catheter
  • Resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Chawla, L. S., Zia, H., Gutierrez, G., Katz, N. M., Seneff, M. G., & Shah, M. (2004). Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest, 126(6), 1891-1896. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.6.1891

Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. / Chawla, Lakhmir S.; Zia, Hasan; Gutierrez, Guillermo; Katz, Nevin M.; Seneff, Michael G.; Shah, Muhammed.

In: Chest, Vol. 126, No. 6, 12.2004, p. 1891-1896.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chawla, LS, Zia, H, Gutierrez, G, Katz, NM, Seneff, MG & Shah, M 2004, 'Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation', Chest, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1891-1896. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.6.1891
Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G, Katz NM, Seneff MG, Shah M. Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1891-1896. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.6.1891
Chawla, Lakhmir S. ; Zia, Hasan ; Gutierrez, Guillermo ; Katz, Nevin M. ; Seneff, Michael G. ; Shah, Muhammed. / Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. In: Chest. 2004 ; Vol. 126, No. 6. pp. 1891-1896.
@article{b31004fbbbb64a14a7100f3767f25710,
title = "Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation",
abstract = "Study objective: We compared paired samples of central venous O2 saturation (ScvO2) and mixed venous O2 saturation (Sv̄O2) to test the hypothesis that ScvO2 is equivalent to Sv̄O2. We also compared O2 consumption (V̇O2) computed with ScvO2 (V̇O2cv) to that computed with Sv̄O2 (V̇O2v). Design: Prospective, sequential, observational study. Setting: Combined medical-surgical ICU. Patients: Fifty-three individuals > 18 years of age of either sex who required a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to guide fluid therapy. Subjects were identified as postsurgical (32 patients) or medical (21 patients) according to their ICU admission diagnosis. Interventions: A PAC was inserted through the internal jugular or subclavian veins. Care was taken to place the PAC proximal port approximately 3 cm above the tricuspid valve. Blood samples were drawn from the proximal and distal ports in random order. An arterial blood sample also was drawn. Measurements: Cardiac output in triplicate, systemic pressure, and central pressure. We analyzed blood samples for hemoglobin concentration and O2 saturation (SO2). Data were compared by correlation analysis and by the method of Bland and Altman. Results: Sv̄O2 was consistently lower than ScvO2 (p <0.0001), with a mean (±SD) bias of -5.2 ± 5.1{\%}. Similar differences in ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were present within each subgroup (p <0.001). A lower Sv̄O2 resulted in V̇O2v values that were higher than the V̇O2cv values for all patients in the study (mean V̇O2v, 236.7 ± 103.4 mL/min; mean V̇O2cv, 191.1 ± 84.0 mL/min; p <0.001) as well as for patients within each subgroup (p <0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were not equivalent in this sample of critically ill patients. Moreover, substituting ScvO2 for Sv̄O2 in the calculation of V̇O2 produced unacceptably large errors. The decrease in SO2 between ScvO2 to Sv̄O2 may result from the mixing of atrial and coronary sinus blood. As such, this difference may be a marker of myocardial O2 consumption.",
keywords = "Central venous oxygenation, Coronary sinus, Mixed venous oxygenation, Monitoring, Myocardial metabolism, Oxygen consumption, Oxygen delivery, Pulmonary artery catheter, Resuscitation",
author = "Chawla, {Lakhmir S.} and Hasan Zia and Guillermo Gutierrez and Katz, {Nevin M.} and Seneff, {Michael G.} and Muhammed Shah",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1378/chest.126.6.1891",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "1891--1896",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation

AU - Chawla, Lakhmir S.

AU - Zia, Hasan

AU - Gutierrez, Guillermo

AU - Katz, Nevin M.

AU - Seneff, Michael G.

AU - Shah, Muhammed

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Study objective: We compared paired samples of central venous O2 saturation (ScvO2) and mixed venous O2 saturation (Sv̄O2) to test the hypothesis that ScvO2 is equivalent to Sv̄O2. We also compared O2 consumption (V̇O2) computed with ScvO2 (V̇O2cv) to that computed with Sv̄O2 (V̇O2v). Design: Prospective, sequential, observational study. Setting: Combined medical-surgical ICU. Patients: Fifty-three individuals > 18 years of age of either sex who required a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to guide fluid therapy. Subjects were identified as postsurgical (32 patients) or medical (21 patients) according to their ICU admission diagnosis. Interventions: A PAC was inserted through the internal jugular or subclavian veins. Care was taken to place the PAC proximal port approximately 3 cm above the tricuspid valve. Blood samples were drawn from the proximal and distal ports in random order. An arterial blood sample also was drawn. Measurements: Cardiac output in triplicate, systemic pressure, and central pressure. We analyzed blood samples for hemoglobin concentration and O2 saturation (SO2). Data were compared by correlation analysis and by the method of Bland and Altman. Results: Sv̄O2 was consistently lower than ScvO2 (p <0.0001), with a mean (±SD) bias of -5.2 ± 5.1%. Similar differences in ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were present within each subgroup (p <0.001). A lower Sv̄O2 resulted in V̇O2v values that were higher than the V̇O2cv values for all patients in the study (mean V̇O2v, 236.7 ± 103.4 mL/min; mean V̇O2cv, 191.1 ± 84.0 mL/min; p <0.001) as well as for patients within each subgroup (p <0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were not equivalent in this sample of critically ill patients. Moreover, substituting ScvO2 for Sv̄O2 in the calculation of V̇O2 produced unacceptably large errors. The decrease in SO2 between ScvO2 to Sv̄O2 may result from the mixing of atrial and coronary sinus blood. As such, this difference may be a marker of myocardial O2 consumption.

AB - Study objective: We compared paired samples of central venous O2 saturation (ScvO2) and mixed venous O2 saturation (Sv̄O2) to test the hypothesis that ScvO2 is equivalent to Sv̄O2. We also compared O2 consumption (V̇O2) computed with ScvO2 (V̇O2cv) to that computed with Sv̄O2 (V̇O2v). Design: Prospective, sequential, observational study. Setting: Combined medical-surgical ICU. Patients: Fifty-three individuals > 18 years of age of either sex who required a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to guide fluid therapy. Subjects were identified as postsurgical (32 patients) or medical (21 patients) according to their ICU admission diagnosis. Interventions: A PAC was inserted through the internal jugular or subclavian veins. Care was taken to place the PAC proximal port approximately 3 cm above the tricuspid valve. Blood samples were drawn from the proximal and distal ports in random order. An arterial blood sample also was drawn. Measurements: Cardiac output in triplicate, systemic pressure, and central pressure. We analyzed blood samples for hemoglobin concentration and O2 saturation (SO2). Data were compared by correlation analysis and by the method of Bland and Altman. Results: Sv̄O2 was consistently lower than ScvO2 (p <0.0001), with a mean (±SD) bias of -5.2 ± 5.1%. Similar differences in ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were present within each subgroup (p <0.001). A lower Sv̄O2 resulted in V̇O2v values that were higher than the V̇O2cv values for all patients in the study (mean V̇O2v, 236.7 ± 103.4 mL/min; mean V̇O2cv, 191.1 ± 84.0 mL/min; p <0.001) as well as for patients within each subgroup (p <0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of ScvO2 and Sv̄O2 were not equivalent in this sample of critically ill patients. Moreover, substituting ScvO2 for Sv̄O2 in the calculation of V̇O2 produced unacceptably large errors. The decrease in SO2 between ScvO2 to Sv̄O2 may result from the mixing of atrial and coronary sinus blood. As such, this difference may be a marker of myocardial O2 consumption.

KW - Central venous oxygenation

KW - Coronary sinus

KW - Mixed venous oxygenation

KW - Monitoring

KW - Myocardial metabolism

KW - Oxygen consumption

KW - Oxygen delivery

KW - Pulmonary artery catheter

KW - Resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10444279213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10444279213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.126.6.1891

DO - 10.1378/chest.126.6.1891

M3 - Article

C2 - 15596689

AN - SCOPUS:10444279213

VL - 126

SP - 1891

EP - 1896

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -