Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time

João Biehl, Mariana P Socal, Varun Gauri, Debora Diniz, Marcelo Medeiros, Gabriela Rondon, Joseph J. Amon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the past two decades, debate over the whys, the hows, and the effects of the ever-expanding phenomenon of right-to-health litigation (‘judicialization’) throughout Latin America have been marked by polarised arguments and limited information. In contrast to claims of judicialization as a positive or negative trend, less attention has been paid to ways to better understand the phenomenon in real time. In this article, we propose a new approach—Judicialization 2.0—that recognises judicialization as an integral part of democratic life. This approach seeks to expand access to information about litigation on access to medicines (and health care generally) in order to better characterise the complexity of the phenomenon and thus inform new research and more robust public discussions. Drawing from our multi-disciplinary perspectives and field experiences in highly judicialized contexts, we thus describe a new multi-source, multi-stakeholder mixed-method approach designed to capture the patterns and heterogeneity of judicialization and understand its medical and socio-political impact in real time, along with its counterfactuals. By facilitating greater data availability and open access, we can drive advancements towards transparent and participatory priority setting, as well as accountability mechanisms that promote quality universal health coverage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Public Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 22 2018

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
Universal Coverage
Access to Information
Health Services Accessibility
Latin America
Social Responsibility
Health
Research
Drive

Keywords

  • judicialization studies
  • Latin America
  • open access data and participatory research
  • Right-to-health litigation
  • universal health coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Biehl, J., Socal, M. P., Gauri, V., Diniz, D., Medeiros, M., Rondon, G., & Amon, J. J. (Accepted/In press). Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time. Global Public Health, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483

Judicialization 2.0 : Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time. / Biehl, João; Socal, Mariana P; Gauri, Varun; Diniz, Debora; Medeiros, Marcelo; Rondon, Gabriela; Amon, Joseph J.

In: Global Public Health, 22.05.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Biehl, João ; Socal, Mariana P ; Gauri, Varun ; Diniz, Debora ; Medeiros, Marcelo ; Rondon, Gabriela ; Amon, Joseph J. / Judicialization 2.0 : Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time. In: Global Public Health. 2018 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{64421c665e484486b1dd1a6c35abf2a6,
title = "Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time",
abstract = "Over the past two decades, debate over the whys, the hows, and the effects of the ever-expanding phenomenon of right-to-health litigation (‘judicialization’) throughout Latin America have been marked by polarised arguments and limited information. In contrast to claims of judicialization as a positive or negative trend, less attention has been paid to ways to better understand the phenomenon in real time. In this article, we propose a new approach—Judicialization 2.0—that recognises judicialization as an integral part of democratic life. This approach seeks to expand access to information about litigation on access to medicines (and health care generally) in order to better characterise the complexity of the phenomenon and thus inform new research and more robust public discussions. Drawing from our multi-disciplinary perspectives and field experiences in highly judicialized contexts, we thus describe a new multi-source, multi-stakeholder mixed-method approach designed to capture the patterns and heterogeneity of judicialization and understand its medical and socio-political impact in real time, along with its counterfactuals. By facilitating greater data availability and open access, we can drive advancements towards transparent and participatory priority setting, as well as accountability mechanisms that promote quality universal health coverage.",
keywords = "judicialization studies, Latin America, open access data and participatory research, Right-to-health litigation, universal health coverage",
author = "Jo{\~a}o Biehl and Socal, {Mariana P} and Varun Gauri and Debora Diniz and Marcelo Medeiros and Gabriela Rondon and Amon, {Joseph J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Global Public Health",
issn = "1744-1692",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judicialization 2.0

T2 - Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time

AU - Biehl, João

AU - Socal, Mariana P

AU - Gauri, Varun

AU - Diniz, Debora

AU - Medeiros, Marcelo

AU - Rondon, Gabriela

AU - Amon, Joseph J.

PY - 2018/5/22

Y1 - 2018/5/22

N2 - Over the past two decades, debate over the whys, the hows, and the effects of the ever-expanding phenomenon of right-to-health litigation (‘judicialization’) throughout Latin America have been marked by polarised arguments and limited information. In contrast to claims of judicialization as a positive or negative trend, less attention has been paid to ways to better understand the phenomenon in real time. In this article, we propose a new approach—Judicialization 2.0—that recognises judicialization as an integral part of democratic life. This approach seeks to expand access to information about litigation on access to medicines (and health care generally) in order to better characterise the complexity of the phenomenon and thus inform new research and more robust public discussions. Drawing from our multi-disciplinary perspectives and field experiences in highly judicialized contexts, we thus describe a new multi-source, multi-stakeholder mixed-method approach designed to capture the patterns and heterogeneity of judicialization and understand its medical and socio-political impact in real time, along with its counterfactuals. By facilitating greater data availability and open access, we can drive advancements towards transparent and participatory priority setting, as well as accountability mechanisms that promote quality universal health coverage.

AB - Over the past two decades, debate over the whys, the hows, and the effects of the ever-expanding phenomenon of right-to-health litigation (‘judicialization’) throughout Latin America have been marked by polarised arguments and limited information. In contrast to claims of judicialization as a positive or negative trend, less attention has been paid to ways to better understand the phenomenon in real time. In this article, we propose a new approach—Judicialization 2.0—that recognises judicialization as an integral part of democratic life. This approach seeks to expand access to information about litigation on access to medicines (and health care generally) in order to better characterise the complexity of the phenomenon and thus inform new research and more robust public discussions. Drawing from our multi-disciplinary perspectives and field experiences in highly judicialized contexts, we thus describe a new multi-source, multi-stakeholder mixed-method approach designed to capture the patterns and heterogeneity of judicialization and understand its medical and socio-political impact in real time, along with its counterfactuals. By facilitating greater data availability and open access, we can drive advancements towards transparent and participatory priority setting, as well as accountability mechanisms that promote quality universal health coverage.

KW - judicialization studies

KW - Latin America

KW - open access data and participatory research

KW - Right-to-health litigation

KW - universal health coverage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047217068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047217068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483

DO - 10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483

M3 - Article

C2 - 29781395

AN - SCOPUS:85047217068

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Global Public Health

JF - Global Public Health

SN - 1744-1692

ER -