Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and Communications Board task force report

Mark Appelbaum, Harris Cooper, Rex B. Kline, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Arthur M. Nezu, Stephen M. Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Following a review of extant reporting standards for scientific publication, and reviewing 10 years of experience since publication of the first set of reporting standards by the American Psychological Association (APA; APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2008), the APA Working Group on Quantitative Research Reporting Standards recommended some modifications to the original standards. Examples of modifications include division of hypotheses, analyses, and conclusions into 3 groupings (primary, secondary, and exploratory) and some changes to the section on meta-analysis. Several new modules are included that report standards for observational studies, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, replication studies, and N-of-1 studies. In addition, standards for analytic methods with unique characteristics and output (structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis) are included. These proposals were accepted by the Publications and Communications Board of APA and supersede the standards included in the 6th edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-25
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • APA Style
  • Meta-analysis
  • Reporting standards
  • Research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and Communications Board task force report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this