Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: Police power and civil liberties in tension

Lawrence O. Gostin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ-to account for developments in constitutional law-but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-581
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume95
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Police
Public Health
Social Justice
Jurisprudence
Vaccination
Exercise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years : Police power and civil liberties in tension. / Gostin, Lawrence O.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 576-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05bab163444c4ad8a31ff1d579c88c97,
title = "Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: Police power and civil liberties in tension",
abstract = "A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ-to account for developments in constitutional law-but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.",
author = "Gostin, {Lawrence O.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2004.055152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "576--581",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years

T2 - Police power and civil liberties in tension

AU - Gostin, Lawrence O.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ-to account for developments in constitutional law-but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.

AB - A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ-to account for developments in constitutional law-but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13744260994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13744260994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055152

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055152

M3 - Article

C2 - 15798112

AN - SCOPUS:13744260994

VL - 95

SP - 576

EP - 581

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 4

ER -