Issues in the design and interpretation of studies to evaluate the impact of community-based interventions

Betty R. Kirkwood, Simon N. Cousens, Cesar G. Victora, Isabelle De Zoysa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Increasingly, epidemiologists are faced with the need to evaluate the impact of an intervention that is delivered at the level of a community or cluster of individuals, rather than at the individual level. This hag profound implications for the design and interpretation of a study to evaluate its impact. We start by discussing the issues arising in the extension of the randomized double-blind controlled trial methodology to the evaluation of interventions delivered to clusters of individuals, or to whole communities, where the unit of randomization is a cluster of individuals rather than an individual we then consider alternative approaches to design, discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses and present a framework of design options. Finally we propose a pragmatic approach to evaluation design in this setting. We believe that the answer lies in the judicious selection of different design elements, combined in such a way that when the evidence from each is presented together, a clear picture of the impact of the intervention emerges. We illustrate this using an example from the recent literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1029
Number of pages8
JournalTropical Medicine and International Health
Volume2
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Random Allocation
Epidemiologists

Keywords

  • Community-based interventions
  • Developing countries
  • Evaluation
  • Study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Parasitology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Issues in the design and interpretation of studies to evaluate the impact of community-based interventions. / Kirkwood, Betty R.; Cousens, Simon N.; Victora, Cesar G.; De Zoysa, Isabelle.

In: Tropical Medicine and International Health, Vol. 2, No. 11, 1997, p. 1022-1029.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirkwood, Betty R. ; Cousens, Simon N. ; Victora, Cesar G. ; De Zoysa, Isabelle. / Issues in the design and interpretation of studies to evaluate the impact of community-based interventions. In: Tropical Medicine and International Health. 1997 ; Vol. 2, No. 11. pp. 1022-1029.
@article{fc82be0b135c43d698ce1b1dbac40803,
title = "Issues in the design and interpretation of studies to evaluate the impact of community-based interventions",
abstract = "Increasingly, epidemiologists are faced with the need to evaluate the impact of an intervention that is delivered at the level of a community or cluster of individuals, rather than at the individual level. This hag profound implications for the design and interpretation of a study to evaluate its impact. We start by discussing the issues arising in the extension of the randomized double-blind controlled trial methodology to the evaluation of interventions delivered to clusters of individuals, or to whole communities, where the unit of randomization is a cluster of individuals rather than an individual we then consider alternative approaches to design, discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses and present a framework of design options. Finally we propose a pragmatic approach to evaluation design in this setting. We believe that the answer lies in the judicious selection of different design elements, combined in such a way that when the evidence from each is presented together, a clear picture of the impact of the intervention emerges. We illustrate this using an example from the recent literature.",
keywords = "Community-based interventions, Developing countries, Evaluation, Study design",
author = "Kirkwood, {Betty R.} and Cousens, {Simon N.} and Victora, {Cesar G.} and {De Zoysa}, Isabelle",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "1022--1029",
journal = "Tropical Medicine and International Health",
issn = "1360-2276",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues in the design and interpretation of studies to evaluate the impact of community-based interventions

AU - Kirkwood, Betty R.

AU - Cousens, Simon N.

AU - Victora, Cesar G.

AU - De Zoysa, Isabelle

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Increasingly, epidemiologists are faced with the need to evaluate the impact of an intervention that is delivered at the level of a community or cluster of individuals, rather than at the individual level. This hag profound implications for the design and interpretation of a study to evaluate its impact. We start by discussing the issues arising in the extension of the randomized double-blind controlled trial methodology to the evaluation of interventions delivered to clusters of individuals, or to whole communities, where the unit of randomization is a cluster of individuals rather than an individual we then consider alternative approaches to design, discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses and present a framework of design options. Finally we propose a pragmatic approach to evaluation design in this setting. We believe that the answer lies in the judicious selection of different design elements, combined in such a way that when the evidence from each is presented together, a clear picture of the impact of the intervention emerges. We illustrate this using an example from the recent literature.

AB - Increasingly, epidemiologists are faced with the need to evaluate the impact of an intervention that is delivered at the level of a community or cluster of individuals, rather than at the individual level. This hag profound implications for the design and interpretation of a study to evaluate its impact. We start by discussing the issues arising in the extension of the randomized double-blind controlled trial methodology to the evaluation of interventions delivered to clusters of individuals, or to whole communities, where the unit of randomization is a cluster of individuals rather than an individual we then consider alternative approaches to design, discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses and present a framework of design options. Finally we propose a pragmatic approach to evaluation design in this setting. We believe that the answer lies in the judicious selection of different design elements, combined in such a way that when the evidence from each is presented together, a clear picture of the impact of the intervention emerges. We illustrate this using an example from the recent literature.

KW - Community-based interventions

KW - Developing countries

KW - Evaluation

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030656460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030656460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1022

EP - 1029

JO - Tropical Medicine and International Health

JF - Tropical Medicine and International Health

SN - 1360-2276

IS - 11

ER -