Isotropic connections generate functional asymmetrical behavior in visual cortical cells

F. Worgotter, Ernst Niebur, C. Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We study the relationship between structure and function in inhibitory long-range interactions in visual cortex. The sharpening of orientation tuning with 'cross-orientation inhibition' is used as an example to discuss anisotropies that are generated by long-range connections. In this study, as opposed to the detailed cortex model described in a previous report, a model of the cortical orientation column structure is proposed in which cortical cells are described only by their orientation preference. We present results using different geometric arrangements of orientation columns. In the simplest case, straight parallel orientation columns were used. We also utilized more realistic, curved columns generated by a simple algorithm. The results were confirmed by the study of a patch of real column structure, determined experimentally by Swindale et al. A given cell receives functionally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the cell receives inhibitory input that is strongest along its nonpreferred orientation. On the other hand, a cell is said to receive structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the inhibition arises from source cells with an orientation preference orthogonal to that of the target cell. Even though those definitions seem to describe similar situations, we show that, in the general case, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition does not efficiently sharpen orientation selectivity. In particular, for straight and parallel columns, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition results in unequal amounts of inhibition for whole cell populations with different preferred orientations. In more realistic column structures, we studied the question of whether structural cross-orientation inhibition could be implemented in a more efficient way. However, for the majority of cells, it is demonstrated that their nonpreferred stimulus will not preferably excite 'cross-oriented' cells. Thus structural cross-orientation inhibition is not efficient in real cortical columns. We propose a new mechanism called circular inhibition. In this connection scheme, a target cell receives inhibitory input from source cells that are located at a given distance (the same for all cells) from the target cell. Circular inhibition can be regarded as two-dimensional long-range lateral inhibition. As opposed to structural cross-orientation inhibition, this mechanism does not introduce unwanted anisotropies in the orientation tuning of the target cells. It is also conceptually much simpler and developmentally advantageous. It is shown that this connection scheme results in a net functional cross-orientation inhibition in all realistic column geometries. The inhibitory tuning strength obtained with circular inhibition is weak and similar to that measured in reality. Circular inhibition is isotropically arranged with respect to the target cell. Intriguingly, we find that it induces a directional bias in most of the cells regardless of the column structure. This effect is not due to noise-induced symmetry breaking but arises as an inherent feature of the functional architecture of visual cortex. This study goes beyond approaches that describe cortical mappings in that it investigates the functional limitations imposed by interactions between intracortical connection schemes and the geometry of the column structure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)444-459
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume66
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anisotropy
Visual Cortex
Noise
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Isotropic connections generate functional asymmetrical behavior in visual cortical cells. / Worgotter, F.; Niebur, Ernst; Koch, C.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 66, No. 2, 1991, p. 444-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7360dce158e64e689bf5a7645557f69b,
title = "Isotropic connections generate functional asymmetrical behavior in visual cortical cells",
abstract = "We study the relationship between structure and function in inhibitory long-range interactions in visual cortex. The sharpening of orientation tuning with 'cross-orientation inhibition' is used as an example to discuss anisotropies that are generated by long-range connections. In this study, as opposed to the detailed cortex model described in a previous report, a model of the cortical orientation column structure is proposed in which cortical cells are described only by their orientation preference. We present results using different geometric arrangements of orientation columns. In the simplest case, straight parallel orientation columns were used. We also utilized more realistic, curved columns generated by a simple algorithm. The results were confirmed by the study of a patch of real column structure, determined experimentally by Swindale et al. A given cell receives functionally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the cell receives inhibitory input that is strongest along its nonpreferred orientation. On the other hand, a cell is said to receive structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the inhibition arises from source cells with an orientation preference orthogonal to that of the target cell. Even though those definitions seem to describe similar situations, we show that, in the general case, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition does not efficiently sharpen orientation selectivity. In particular, for straight and parallel columns, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition results in unequal amounts of inhibition for whole cell populations with different preferred orientations. In more realistic column structures, we studied the question of whether structural cross-orientation inhibition could be implemented in a more efficient way. However, for the majority of cells, it is demonstrated that their nonpreferred stimulus will not preferably excite 'cross-oriented' cells. Thus structural cross-orientation inhibition is not efficient in real cortical columns. We propose a new mechanism called circular inhibition. In this connection scheme, a target cell receives inhibitory input from source cells that are located at a given distance (the same for all cells) from the target cell. Circular inhibition can be regarded as two-dimensional long-range lateral inhibition. As opposed to structural cross-orientation inhibition, this mechanism does not introduce unwanted anisotropies in the orientation tuning of the target cells. It is also conceptually much simpler and developmentally advantageous. It is shown that this connection scheme results in a net functional cross-orientation inhibition in all realistic column geometries. The inhibitory tuning strength obtained with circular inhibition is weak and similar to that measured in reality. Circular inhibition is isotropically arranged with respect to the target cell. Intriguingly, we find that it induces a directional bias in most of the cells regardless of the column structure. This effect is not due to noise-induced symmetry breaking but arises as an inherent feature of the functional architecture of visual cortex. This study goes beyond approaches that describe cortical mappings in that it investigates the functional limitations imposed by interactions between intracortical connection schemes and the geometry of the column structure.",
author = "F. Worgotter and Ernst Niebur and C. Koch",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "444--459",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isotropic connections generate functional asymmetrical behavior in visual cortical cells

AU - Worgotter, F.

AU - Niebur, Ernst

AU - Koch, C.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - We study the relationship between structure and function in inhibitory long-range interactions in visual cortex. The sharpening of orientation tuning with 'cross-orientation inhibition' is used as an example to discuss anisotropies that are generated by long-range connections. In this study, as opposed to the detailed cortex model described in a previous report, a model of the cortical orientation column structure is proposed in which cortical cells are described only by their orientation preference. We present results using different geometric arrangements of orientation columns. In the simplest case, straight parallel orientation columns were used. We also utilized more realistic, curved columns generated by a simple algorithm. The results were confirmed by the study of a patch of real column structure, determined experimentally by Swindale et al. A given cell receives functionally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the cell receives inhibitory input that is strongest along its nonpreferred orientation. On the other hand, a cell is said to receive structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the inhibition arises from source cells with an orientation preference orthogonal to that of the target cell. Even though those definitions seem to describe similar situations, we show that, in the general case, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition does not efficiently sharpen orientation selectivity. In particular, for straight and parallel columns, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition results in unequal amounts of inhibition for whole cell populations with different preferred orientations. In more realistic column structures, we studied the question of whether structural cross-orientation inhibition could be implemented in a more efficient way. However, for the majority of cells, it is demonstrated that their nonpreferred stimulus will not preferably excite 'cross-oriented' cells. Thus structural cross-orientation inhibition is not efficient in real cortical columns. We propose a new mechanism called circular inhibition. In this connection scheme, a target cell receives inhibitory input from source cells that are located at a given distance (the same for all cells) from the target cell. Circular inhibition can be regarded as two-dimensional long-range lateral inhibition. As opposed to structural cross-orientation inhibition, this mechanism does not introduce unwanted anisotropies in the orientation tuning of the target cells. It is also conceptually much simpler and developmentally advantageous. It is shown that this connection scheme results in a net functional cross-orientation inhibition in all realistic column geometries. The inhibitory tuning strength obtained with circular inhibition is weak and similar to that measured in reality. Circular inhibition is isotropically arranged with respect to the target cell. Intriguingly, we find that it induces a directional bias in most of the cells regardless of the column structure. This effect is not due to noise-induced symmetry breaking but arises as an inherent feature of the functional architecture of visual cortex. This study goes beyond approaches that describe cortical mappings in that it investigates the functional limitations imposed by interactions between intracortical connection schemes and the geometry of the column structure.

AB - We study the relationship between structure and function in inhibitory long-range interactions in visual cortex. The sharpening of orientation tuning with 'cross-orientation inhibition' is used as an example to discuss anisotropies that are generated by long-range connections. In this study, as opposed to the detailed cortex model described in a previous report, a model of the cortical orientation column structure is proposed in which cortical cells are described only by their orientation preference. We present results using different geometric arrangements of orientation columns. In the simplest case, straight parallel orientation columns were used. We also utilized more realistic, curved columns generated by a simple algorithm. The results were confirmed by the study of a patch of real column structure, determined experimentally by Swindale et al. A given cell receives functionally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the cell receives inhibitory input that is strongest along its nonpreferred orientation. On the other hand, a cell is said to receive structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition if the inhibition arises from source cells with an orientation preference orthogonal to that of the target cell. Even though those definitions seem to describe similar situations, we show that, in the general case, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition does not efficiently sharpen orientation selectivity. In particular, for straight and parallel columns, structurally defined cross-orientation inhibition results in unequal amounts of inhibition for whole cell populations with different preferred orientations. In more realistic column structures, we studied the question of whether structural cross-orientation inhibition could be implemented in a more efficient way. However, for the majority of cells, it is demonstrated that their nonpreferred stimulus will not preferably excite 'cross-oriented' cells. Thus structural cross-orientation inhibition is not efficient in real cortical columns. We propose a new mechanism called circular inhibition. In this connection scheme, a target cell receives inhibitory input from source cells that are located at a given distance (the same for all cells) from the target cell. Circular inhibition can be regarded as two-dimensional long-range lateral inhibition. As opposed to structural cross-orientation inhibition, this mechanism does not introduce unwanted anisotropies in the orientation tuning of the target cells. It is also conceptually much simpler and developmentally advantageous. It is shown that this connection scheme results in a net functional cross-orientation inhibition in all realistic column geometries. The inhibitory tuning strength obtained with circular inhibition is weak and similar to that measured in reality. Circular inhibition is isotropically arranged with respect to the target cell. Intriguingly, we find that it induces a directional bias in most of the cells regardless of the column structure. This effect is not due to noise-induced symmetry breaking but arises as an inherent feature of the functional architecture of visual cortex. This study goes beyond approaches that describe cortical mappings in that it investigates the functional limitations imposed by interactions between intracortical connection schemes and the geometry of the column structure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025743012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025743012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1774581

AN - SCOPUS:0025743012

VL - 66

SP - 444

EP - 459

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 2

ER -