Isolated Limb Perfusion for Localized Melanoma of the Extremity: A Matched Comparison of Wide Local Excision With Isolated Limb Perfusion and Wide Local Excision Alone

Michael J. Edwards, Seng Jaw Soong, Arthur W. Boddie, Charles M. Balch, Charles M. McBride

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

• The therapeutic efficacy of isolated limb perfusion in patients with localized melanoma of the extremity remains controversial. We compared patients treated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, with wide local excision and isolated limb perfusion using either melphalan or imidazole carboxamide with a group matched for prognostic factors from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the University of Sydney (Australia) who were treated with wide local excision alone. No significant difference in disease-free or overall survival rates was found between patients treated with wide local excision with adjuvant isolated limb perfusion or wide local excision alone. However, a subset of patients with thicker lesions (>2.0 mm) treated with wide local excision and isolated limb perfusion using melphalan had a significant improvement in both diseasefree and overall survival rates. These data suggest that isolated limb perfusion using melphalan may improve survival rates in selected patients with localized melanoma of the extremity who are at increased risk for local and regional micrometastases, and justifies the continued study of this treatment approach in prospective clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-321
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of surgery
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Isolated Limb Perfusion for Localized Melanoma of the Extremity: A Matched Comparison of Wide Local Excision With Isolated Limb Perfusion and Wide Local Excision Alone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this