Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms?

Robert E. Gutman, Daniel E Ford, Lieschen H. Quiroz, Stuart H. Shippey, Victoria L Handa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum threshold level at which maximum anatomic prolapse predicts bothersome pelvic floor symptoms. Study Design: We performed a cross-sectional study of women older than 40 years undergoing gynecologic and urogynecologic examinations using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations to assess support and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaires to assess symptoms. Across the spectrum of prolapse severity, we calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) for each symptom. Results: Of 296 participants, age was 56.3 ± 11.2 years, and 233 (79%) were white. POP-Q stage was 0 in 39 (13%), 1 in 136 (46%), 2 in 89 (30%), and 3 in 33 (11%). ROC analysis for each symptom revealed an AUC of 0.89 for bulging/protrusion; 0.81 for splinting to void; 0.55-0.62 for other prolapse and urinary symptoms; and 0.48-0.56 for bowel symptoms. Using a threshold of 0.5 cm distal to the hymen, the sensitivity (69%) and specificity (97%) were high for protrusion symptoms but poor for most other symptoms considered. Conclusion: Vaginal descensus 0.5 cm distal to the hymen accurately predicts bulging/protrusion symptoms; however, we could not identify a threshold of prolapse severity that predicted other pelvic floor symptoms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume199
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Pelvic Floor
Prolapse
Hymen
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Cross-Sectional Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • bulging and protrusion symptoms
  • Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System
  • prolapse
  • receiver operating characteristic curve
  • threshold

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms? / Gutman, Robert E.; Ford, Daniel E; Quiroz, Lieschen H.; Shippey, Stuart H.; Handa, Victoria L.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 199, No. 6, 12.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d346d52f92074df78c4da25aa603a293,
title = "Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms?",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum threshold level at which maximum anatomic prolapse predicts bothersome pelvic floor symptoms. Study Design: We performed a cross-sectional study of women older than 40 years undergoing gynecologic and urogynecologic examinations using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations to assess support and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaires to assess symptoms. Across the spectrum of prolapse severity, we calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) for each symptom. Results: Of 296 participants, age was 56.3 ± 11.2 years, and 233 (79{\%}) were white. POP-Q stage was 0 in 39 (13{\%}), 1 in 136 (46{\%}), 2 in 89 (30{\%}), and 3 in 33 (11{\%}). ROC analysis for each symptom revealed an AUC of 0.89 for bulging/protrusion; 0.81 for splinting to void; 0.55-0.62 for other prolapse and urinary symptoms; and 0.48-0.56 for bowel symptoms. Using a threshold of 0.5 cm distal to the hymen, the sensitivity (69{\%}) and specificity (97{\%}) were high for protrusion symptoms but poor for most other symptoms considered. Conclusion: Vaginal descensus 0.5 cm distal to the hymen accurately predicts bulging/protrusion symptoms; however, we could not identify a threshold of prolapse severity that predicted other pelvic floor symptoms.",
keywords = "bulging and protrusion symptoms, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System, prolapse, receiver operating characteristic curve, threshold",
author = "Gutman, {Robert E.} and Ford, {Daniel E} and Quiroz, {Lieschen H.} and Shippey, {Stuart H.} and Handa, {Victoria L}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms?

AU - Gutman, Robert E.

AU - Ford, Daniel E

AU - Quiroz, Lieschen H.

AU - Shippey, Stuart H.

AU - Handa, Victoria L

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum threshold level at which maximum anatomic prolapse predicts bothersome pelvic floor symptoms. Study Design: We performed a cross-sectional study of women older than 40 years undergoing gynecologic and urogynecologic examinations using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations to assess support and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaires to assess symptoms. Across the spectrum of prolapse severity, we calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) for each symptom. Results: Of 296 participants, age was 56.3 ± 11.2 years, and 233 (79%) were white. POP-Q stage was 0 in 39 (13%), 1 in 136 (46%), 2 in 89 (30%), and 3 in 33 (11%). ROC analysis for each symptom revealed an AUC of 0.89 for bulging/protrusion; 0.81 for splinting to void; 0.55-0.62 for other prolapse and urinary symptoms; and 0.48-0.56 for bowel symptoms. Using a threshold of 0.5 cm distal to the hymen, the sensitivity (69%) and specificity (97%) were high for protrusion symptoms but poor for most other symptoms considered. Conclusion: Vaginal descensus 0.5 cm distal to the hymen accurately predicts bulging/protrusion symptoms; however, we could not identify a threshold of prolapse severity that predicted other pelvic floor symptoms.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum threshold level at which maximum anatomic prolapse predicts bothersome pelvic floor symptoms. Study Design: We performed a cross-sectional study of women older than 40 years undergoing gynecologic and urogynecologic examinations using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations to assess support and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaires to assess symptoms. Across the spectrum of prolapse severity, we calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) for each symptom. Results: Of 296 participants, age was 56.3 ± 11.2 years, and 233 (79%) were white. POP-Q stage was 0 in 39 (13%), 1 in 136 (46%), 2 in 89 (30%), and 3 in 33 (11%). ROC analysis for each symptom revealed an AUC of 0.89 for bulging/protrusion; 0.81 for splinting to void; 0.55-0.62 for other prolapse and urinary symptoms; and 0.48-0.56 for bowel symptoms. Using a threshold of 0.5 cm distal to the hymen, the sensitivity (69%) and specificity (97%) were high for protrusion symptoms but poor for most other symptoms considered. Conclusion: Vaginal descensus 0.5 cm distal to the hymen accurately predicts bulging/protrusion symptoms; however, we could not identify a threshold of prolapse severity that predicted other pelvic floor symptoms.

KW - bulging and protrusion symptoms

KW - Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory

KW - Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System

KW - prolapse

KW - receiver operating characteristic curve

KW - threshold

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149122989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57149122989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.028

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.028

M3 - Article

VL - 199

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -