Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients

Naveen M. Krishnan; John P. Fischer; Marten N. Basta; Maurice Y. Nahabedian

doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients

Naveen M. Krishnan, John P. Fischer, Marten N. Basta, Maurice Y. Nahabedian

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1205e-1206e
Journal	Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume	139
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301
State	Published - May 1 2017
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

Cite this

Krishnan, N. M., Fischer, J. P., Basta, M. N., & Nahabedian, M. Y. (2017). Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 139(5), 1205e-1206e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. / Krishnan, Naveen M.; Fischer, John P.; Basta, Marten N. et al.
In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 139, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 1205e-1206e.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Krishnan, NM, Fischer, JP, Basta, MN & Nahabedian, MY 2017, 'Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients', Plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1205e-1206e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

@article{60a9106a1bc54279bfbee5d646637fdd,

title = "Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients",

author = "Krishnan, {Naveen M.} and Fischer, {John P.} and Basta, {Marten N.} and Nahabedian, {Maurice Y.}",

year = "2017",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "139",

pages = "1205e--1206e",

journal = "Plastic and reconstructive surgery",

issn = "0032-1052",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply

T2 - Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients

AU - Krishnan, Naveen M.

AU - Fischer, John P.

AU - Basta, Marten N.

AU - Nahabedian, Maurice Y.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010886940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010886940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003301

M3 - Letter

C2 - 28085718

AN - SCOPUS:85010886940

SN - 0032-1052

VL - 139

SP - 1205e-1206e

JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

IS - 5

ER -

Reply: Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this