Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery

Colleen Koch, Liang Li, Eric Hixson, Anne Tang, Steve Gordon, David Longworth, Shannon Phillips, Eugene Blackstone, J. Michael Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Postoperative infections increase morbidity, resource use, and costs. Our objective was to examine whether within guideline recommendations an optimal time exists for an initial dose of antibiotic to reduce postoperative infections in general surgery, and to simulate the magnitude of a reduction in infections should an optimal time be implemented. Study Design The population consisted of 6,731 patients who underwent 7,095 general surgery procedures between January 5, 2006 and June 25, 2012. Patients with pre-existing infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis, and patients with no recorded use of antibiotics were excluded, as were patients on vancomycin and surgical procedures longer than 4 hours in duration. The final analysis dataset included 4,453 patients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used for perioperative variables and outcomes. The end point was a composite of wound disruption; superficial, deep, organ space, surgical site infections; and sepsis. Semi-parametric logistic regression was used to study the association between antibiotic timing and infection. Results There were 444 (10%) patients with a primary end point of infectious complication. A nonlinear "bowl-shaped" relationship between duration of interval from antibiotic administration and surgical incision and infection was observed; lowest risk corresponding to administration time close to incision was 4 minutes before incision (95% one-sided CI, 0-18 minutes). The model suggested optimal timing would result in an 11.3% reduction in the primary infection end point. Conclusions Risk of infectious complications decreased as antibiotic administration moved closer to incision time. These data suggest an opportunity to reduce infections by 11.3% by targeting initial antibiotic administration closer to incision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)628-635
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume217
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infection
Sepsis
Surgical Wound Infection
Vancomycin
Quality Improvement
Pneumonia
Logistic Models
Guidelines
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery. / Koch, Colleen; Li, Liang; Hixson, Eric; Tang, Anne; Gordon, Steve; Longworth, David; Phillips, Shannon; Blackstone, Eugene; Henderson, J. Michael.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 217, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 628-635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koch, C, Li, L, Hixson, E, Tang, A, Gordon, S, Longworth, D, Phillips, S, Blackstone, E & Henderson, JM 2013, 'Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 628-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.024
Koch, Colleen ; Li, Liang ; Hixson, Eric ; Tang, Anne ; Gordon, Steve ; Longworth, David ; Phillips, Shannon ; Blackstone, Eugene ; Henderson, J. Michael. / Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013 ; Vol. 217, No. 4. pp. 628-635.
@article{cb92197e8daa40de8bedd193d534f8b9,
title = "Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery",
abstract = "Background Postoperative infections increase morbidity, resource use, and costs. Our objective was to examine whether within guideline recommendations an optimal time exists for an initial dose of antibiotic to reduce postoperative infections in general surgery, and to simulate the magnitude of a reduction in infections should an optimal time be implemented. Study Design The population consisted of 6,731 patients who underwent 7,095 general surgery procedures between January 5, 2006 and June 25, 2012. Patients with pre-existing infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis, and patients with no recorded use of antibiotics were excluded, as were patients on vancomycin and surgical procedures longer than 4 hours in duration. The final analysis dataset included 4,453 patients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used for perioperative variables and outcomes. The end point was a composite of wound disruption; superficial, deep, organ space, surgical site infections; and sepsis. Semi-parametric logistic regression was used to study the association between antibiotic timing and infection. Results There were 444 (10{\%}) patients with a primary end point of infectious complication. A nonlinear {"}bowl-shaped{"} relationship between duration of interval from antibiotic administration and surgical incision and infection was observed; lowest risk corresponding to administration time close to incision was 4 minutes before incision (95{\%} one-sided CI, 0-18 minutes). The model suggested optimal timing would result in an 11.3{\%} reduction in the primary infection end point. Conclusions Risk of infectious complications decreased as antibiotic administration moved closer to incision time. These data suggest an opportunity to reduce infections by 11.3{\%} by targeting initial antibiotic administration closer to incision.",
author = "Colleen Koch and Liang Li and Eric Hixson and Anne Tang and Steve Gordon and David Longworth and Shannon Phillips and Eugene Blackstone and Henderson, {J. Michael}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "217",
pages = "628--635",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery

AU - Koch, Colleen

AU - Li, Liang

AU - Hixson, Eric

AU - Tang, Anne

AU - Gordon, Steve

AU - Longworth, David

AU - Phillips, Shannon

AU - Blackstone, Eugene

AU - Henderson, J. Michael

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Background Postoperative infections increase morbidity, resource use, and costs. Our objective was to examine whether within guideline recommendations an optimal time exists for an initial dose of antibiotic to reduce postoperative infections in general surgery, and to simulate the magnitude of a reduction in infections should an optimal time be implemented. Study Design The population consisted of 6,731 patients who underwent 7,095 general surgery procedures between January 5, 2006 and June 25, 2012. Patients with pre-existing infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis, and patients with no recorded use of antibiotics were excluded, as were patients on vancomycin and surgical procedures longer than 4 hours in duration. The final analysis dataset included 4,453 patients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used for perioperative variables and outcomes. The end point was a composite of wound disruption; superficial, deep, organ space, surgical site infections; and sepsis. Semi-parametric logistic regression was used to study the association between antibiotic timing and infection. Results There were 444 (10%) patients with a primary end point of infectious complication. A nonlinear "bowl-shaped" relationship between duration of interval from antibiotic administration and surgical incision and infection was observed; lowest risk corresponding to administration time close to incision was 4 minutes before incision (95% one-sided CI, 0-18 minutes). The model suggested optimal timing would result in an 11.3% reduction in the primary infection end point. Conclusions Risk of infectious complications decreased as antibiotic administration moved closer to incision time. These data suggest an opportunity to reduce infections by 11.3% by targeting initial antibiotic administration closer to incision.

AB - Background Postoperative infections increase morbidity, resource use, and costs. Our objective was to examine whether within guideline recommendations an optimal time exists for an initial dose of antibiotic to reduce postoperative infections in general surgery, and to simulate the magnitude of a reduction in infections should an optimal time be implemented. Study Design The population consisted of 6,731 patients who underwent 7,095 general surgery procedures between January 5, 2006 and June 25, 2012. Patients with pre-existing infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis, and patients with no recorded use of antibiotics were excluded, as were patients on vancomycin and surgical procedures longer than 4 hours in duration. The final analysis dataset included 4,453 patients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used for perioperative variables and outcomes. The end point was a composite of wound disruption; superficial, deep, organ space, surgical site infections; and sepsis. Semi-parametric logistic regression was used to study the association between antibiotic timing and infection. Results There were 444 (10%) patients with a primary end point of infectious complication. A nonlinear "bowl-shaped" relationship between duration of interval from antibiotic administration and surgical incision and infection was observed; lowest risk corresponding to administration time close to incision was 4 minutes before incision (95% one-sided CI, 0-18 minutes). The model suggested optimal timing would result in an 11.3% reduction in the primary infection end point. Conclusions Risk of infectious complications decreased as antibiotic administration moved closer to incision time. These data suggest an opportunity to reduce infections by 11.3% by targeting initial antibiotic administration closer to incision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884533389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884533389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 23849901

AN - SCOPUS:84884533389

VL - 217

SP - 628

EP - 635

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -