Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity?

Elizabeth Fee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Is there a conflict between women's values and the values of science? Not only do many aspects of science reproduce the ideology of gender, but science itself has been identified as "masculine." The male way of thinking is said to be rational, impersonal, and objective, while the female way of thinking is said to be emotional, personal, and subjective. This paper argues that the distinction between objectivity and subjectivity is built into science at many levels, and is reproduced in the splits between the production of knowledge and its social uses, between knowledge and experience, between expert and nonexpert, between active subject and passive object, and between the forms of our knowledge and the structures of social and economic power in our society. This analysis leads to the question: is there a feminist science? It is argued that, at present, we can only begin to imagine the general form of a feminist science, which in its fully articulated form, could only be produced in a feminist society. This paper offers examples to suggest ways in which an attack on the subjective/objective distinction could lead to a radically transformed science in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-392
Number of pages15
JournalInternational journal of women's studies
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 1981

Fingerprint

Feminism
Economics

Cite this

Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity? / Fee, Elizabeth.

In: International journal of women's studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, 09.1981, p. 378-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fee, Elizabeth. / Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity?. In: International journal of women's studies. 1981 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 378-392.
@article{835eb05881d84a97b78cc81701302626,
title = "Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity?",
abstract = "Is there a conflict between women's values and the values of science? Not only do many aspects of science reproduce the ideology of gender, but science itself has been identified as {"}masculine.{"} The male way of thinking is said to be rational, impersonal, and objective, while the female way of thinking is said to be emotional, personal, and subjective. This paper argues that the distinction between objectivity and subjectivity is built into science at many levels, and is reproduced in the splits between the production of knowledge and its social uses, between knowledge and experience, between expert and nonexpert, between active subject and passive object, and between the forms of our knowledge and the structures of social and economic power in our society. This analysis leads to the question: is there a feminist science? It is argued that, at present, we can only begin to imagine the general form of a feminist science, which in its fully articulated form, could only be produced in a feminist society. This paper offers examples to suggest ways in which an attack on the subjective/objective distinction could lead to a radically transformed science in the future.",
author = "Elizabeth Fee",
year = "1981",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "378--392",
journal = "International journal of women's studies",
issn = "0703-8240",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity?

AU - Fee, Elizabeth

PY - 1981/9

Y1 - 1981/9

N2 - Is there a conflict between women's values and the values of science? Not only do many aspects of science reproduce the ideology of gender, but science itself has been identified as "masculine." The male way of thinking is said to be rational, impersonal, and objective, while the female way of thinking is said to be emotional, personal, and subjective. This paper argues that the distinction between objectivity and subjectivity is built into science at many levels, and is reproduced in the splits between the production of knowledge and its social uses, between knowledge and experience, between expert and nonexpert, between active subject and passive object, and between the forms of our knowledge and the structures of social and economic power in our society. This analysis leads to the question: is there a feminist science? It is argued that, at present, we can only begin to imagine the general form of a feminist science, which in its fully articulated form, could only be produced in a feminist society. This paper offers examples to suggest ways in which an attack on the subjective/objective distinction could lead to a radically transformed science in the future.

AB - Is there a conflict between women's values and the values of science? Not only do many aspects of science reproduce the ideology of gender, but science itself has been identified as "masculine." The male way of thinking is said to be rational, impersonal, and objective, while the female way of thinking is said to be emotional, personal, and subjective. This paper argues that the distinction between objectivity and subjectivity is built into science at many levels, and is reproduced in the splits between the production of knowledge and its social uses, between knowledge and experience, between expert and nonexpert, between active subject and passive object, and between the forms of our knowledge and the structures of social and economic power in our society. This analysis leads to the question: is there a feminist science? It is argued that, at present, we can only begin to imagine the general form of a feminist science, which in its fully articulated form, could only be produced in a feminist society. This paper offers examples to suggest ways in which an attack on the subjective/objective distinction could lead to a radically transformed science in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019620916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019620916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 378

EP - 392

JO - International journal of women's studies

JF - International journal of women's studies

SN - 0703-8240

IS - 4

ER -