Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Adam W. Levinson, Hugh J. Lavery, Nicholas T. Ward, Li Ming Su, Christian Pavlovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Outcome measures following radical prostatectomy are not standardized. Though excellent potency rates are widely reported, few studies address a return to baseline function. We analyze validated sexual health-related quality-of-life outcomes by a strict definition, a return to baseline function, and compare them to less stringent, yet more frequently referenced, categorical definitions of potency. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from April 2001 to September 2007 completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. We defined a return to baseline as a recovery to greater than one-half standard deviation of the studied population below the patient's own baseline (clinically detectable threshold). We compared these outcomes to a categorical definition of potency involving intercourse frequency. To limit confounders, we performed subset analyses of preoperatively potent men who received bilateral nerve preservation. Factors predictive of return to baseline function were assessed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 568 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age and follow-up were 57.2 years and 16.9 months, respectively. Using the categorical definition, 85% of preoperatively potent men with bilateral nerve preservation were "potent" at 24 months; however, only 27% returned to their baseline sexual function. In multivariable analyses baseline function, number of nerves spared, and age were independent predictors of a return to baseline function. Conclusion: While most preoperatively potent men who receive bilateral nerve preservation engage in intercourse postoperatively, few return to their baseline sexual function. We believe that these data provide context for the expectations of patients who elect extirpative therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-34
Number of pages6
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Reproductive Health
Prostatic Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Laparoscopy
  • Outcomes assessment
  • Prostate cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Sexual function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. / Levinson, Adam W.; Lavery, Hugh J.; Ward, Nicholas T.; Su, Li Ming; Pavlovich, Christian.

In: World Journal of Urology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2011, p. 29-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe3591156a9f43a29b2ecadd6c3660f7,
title = "Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "Objectives: Outcome measures following radical prostatectomy are not standardized. Though excellent potency rates are widely reported, few studies address a return to baseline function. We analyze validated sexual health-related quality-of-life outcomes by a strict definition, a return to baseline function, and compare them to less stringent, yet more frequently referenced, categorical definitions of potency. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from April 2001 to September 2007 completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. We defined a return to baseline as a recovery to greater than one-half standard deviation of the studied population below the patient's own baseline (clinically detectable threshold). We compared these outcomes to a categorical definition of potency involving intercourse frequency. To limit confounders, we performed subset analyses of preoperatively potent men who received bilateral nerve preservation. Factors predictive of return to baseline function were assessed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 568 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age and follow-up were 57.2 years and 16.9 months, respectively. Using the categorical definition, 85{\%} of preoperatively potent men with bilateral nerve preservation were {"}potent{"} at 24 months; however, only 27{\%} returned to their baseline sexual function. In multivariable analyses baseline function, number of nerves spared, and age were independent predictors of a return to baseline function. Conclusion: While most preoperatively potent men who receive bilateral nerve preservation engage in intercourse postoperatively, few return to their baseline sexual function. We believe that these data provide context for the expectations of patients who elect extirpative therapy.",
keywords = "Erectile dysfunction, Laparoscopy, Outcomes assessment, Prostate cancer, Quality of life, Radical prostatectomy, Sexual function",
author = "Levinson, {Adam W.} and Lavery, {Hugh J.} and Ward, {Nicholas T.} and Su, {Li Ming} and Christian Pavlovich",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s00345-010-0616-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "29--34",
journal = "World Journal of Urology",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

AU - Levinson, Adam W.

AU - Lavery, Hugh J.

AU - Ward, Nicholas T.

AU - Su, Li Ming

AU - Pavlovich, Christian

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives: Outcome measures following radical prostatectomy are not standardized. Though excellent potency rates are widely reported, few studies address a return to baseline function. We analyze validated sexual health-related quality-of-life outcomes by a strict definition, a return to baseline function, and compare them to less stringent, yet more frequently referenced, categorical definitions of potency. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from April 2001 to September 2007 completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. We defined a return to baseline as a recovery to greater than one-half standard deviation of the studied population below the patient's own baseline (clinically detectable threshold). We compared these outcomes to a categorical definition of potency involving intercourse frequency. To limit confounders, we performed subset analyses of preoperatively potent men who received bilateral nerve preservation. Factors predictive of return to baseline function were assessed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 568 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age and follow-up were 57.2 years and 16.9 months, respectively. Using the categorical definition, 85% of preoperatively potent men with bilateral nerve preservation were "potent" at 24 months; however, only 27% returned to their baseline sexual function. In multivariable analyses baseline function, number of nerves spared, and age were independent predictors of a return to baseline function. Conclusion: While most preoperatively potent men who receive bilateral nerve preservation engage in intercourse postoperatively, few return to their baseline sexual function. We believe that these data provide context for the expectations of patients who elect extirpative therapy.

AB - Objectives: Outcome measures following radical prostatectomy are not standardized. Though excellent potency rates are widely reported, few studies address a return to baseline function. We analyze validated sexual health-related quality-of-life outcomes by a strict definition, a return to baseline function, and compare them to less stringent, yet more frequently referenced, categorical definitions of potency. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from April 2001 to September 2007 completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. We defined a return to baseline as a recovery to greater than one-half standard deviation of the studied population below the patient's own baseline (clinically detectable threshold). We compared these outcomes to a categorical definition of potency involving intercourse frequency. To limit confounders, we performed subset analyses of preoperatively potent men who received bilateral nerve preservation. Factors predictive of return to baseline function were assessed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 568 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age and follow-up were 57.2 years and 16.9 months, respectively. Using the categorical definition, 85% of preoperatively potent men with bilateral nerve preservation were "potent" at 24 months; however, only 27% returned to their baseline sexual function. In multivariable analyses baseline function, number of nerves spared, and age were independent predictors of a return to baseline function. Conclusion: While most preoperatively potent men who receive bilateral nerve preservation engage in intercourse postoperatively, few return to their baseline sexual function. We believe that these data provide context for the expectations of patients who elect extirpative therapy.

KW - Erectile dysfunction

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Outcomes assessment

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Quality of life

KW - Radical prostatectomy

KW - Sexual function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751646168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751646168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-010-0616-5

DO - 10.1007/s00345-010-0616-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 21107844

AN - SCOPUS:78751646168

VL - 29

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - World Journal of Urology

JF - World Journal of Urology

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 1

ER -