TY - JOUR
T1 - Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules"
AU - Lindquist, Martin A.
AU - Caffo, Brian
AU - Crainiceanu, Ciprian
PY - 2013/11/1
Y1 - 2013/11/1
N2 - The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.
AB - The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880812523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880812523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 23587691
AN - SCOPUS:84880812523
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 81
SP - 499
EP - 502
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
ER -