Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between scar and herniated disk

Canh M. Nguyen, Khang Cheng Ho, Howard An, Lee H Riley, Xu Rongming, Victor M. Haughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the MR contrast enhancement produced by ionic and nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in herniated disk fragments with that in epidural scar tissue. METHODS: A recurrent herniated disk was modeled in canines by using laminectomy to place a fragment of disk cartilage in the epidural space. The dogs were studied 88 and 90 days after laminectomy with MR imaging enhanced with an ionic or a nonionic paramagnetic contrast medium. Contrast enhancement of the epidural scar tissue and the epidural disk fragment was measured at 2, 22, and 45 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was consistently and significantly higher in scar tissue than in disk fragments, although the difference decreased between 2 and 45 minutes after administration of contrast medium. Enhancement of disk fragments was less with the ionic than with the nonionic contrast medium. Contrast between the disk fragments and scar was also greater with the ionic than with the nonionic medium. CONCLUSIONS: The contrast between recurrent disk fragments and scar tissue is affected by the timing of the scan and the choice of contrast medium. Scans obtained immediately after the injection of contrast medium show more contrast between disk fragment and scar than do delayed scans. Recurrent herniated disk fragments are more effectively shown by ionic than by nonionic media.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-505
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume17
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Contrast Media
Cicatrix
Laminectomy
Epidural Space
Injections
Cartilage
Canidae
Dogs

Keywords

  • Animal studies
  • Magnetic resonance, contrast enhancement
  • Spine, intervertebral disks, herniation
  • Spine, magnetic resonance
  • Spine, scar tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between scar and herniated disk. / Nguyen, Canh M.; Ho, Khang Cheng; An, Howard; Riley, Lee H; Rongming, Xu; Haughton, Victor M.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1996, p. 501-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, Canh M. ; Ho, Khang Cheng ; An, Howard ; Riley, Lee H ; Rongming, Xu ; Haughton, Victor M. / Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between scar and herniated disk. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1996 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 501-505.
@article{d3ec1b737ce44ee69167377249b3fa97,
title = "Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between scar and herniated disk",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the MR contrast enhancement produced by ionic and nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in herniated disk fragments with that in epidural scar tissue. METHODS: A recurrent herniated disk was modeled in canines by using laminectomy to place a fragment of disk cartilage in the epidural space. The dogs were studied 88 and 90 days after laminectomy with MR imaging enhanced with an ionic or a nonionic paramagnetic contrast medium. Contrast enhancement of the epidural scar tissue and the epidural disk fragment was measured at 2, 22, and 45 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was consistently and significantly higher in scar tissue than in disk fragments, although the difference decreased between 2 and 45 minutes after administration of contrast medium. Enhancement of disk fragments was less with the ionic than with the nonionic contrast medium. Contrast between the disk fragments and scar was also greater with the ionic than with the nonionic medium. CONCLUSIONS: The contrast between recurrent disk fragments and scar tissue is affected by the timing of the scan and the choice of contrast medium. Scans obtained immediately after the injection of contrast medium show more contrast between disk fragment and scar than do delayed scans. Recurrent herniated disk fragments are more effectively shown by ionic than by nonionic media.",
keywords = "Animal studies, Magnetic resonance, contrast enhancement, Spine, intervertebral disks, herniation, Spine, magnetic resonance, Spine, scar tissue",
author = "Nguyen, {Canh M.} and Ho, {Khang Cheng} and Howard An and Riley, {Lee H} and Xu Rongming and Haughton, {Victor M.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "501--505",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between scar and herniated disk

AU - Nguyen, Canh M.

AU - Ho, Khang Cheng

AU - An, Howard

AU - Riley, Lee H

AU - Rongming, Xu

AU - Haughton, Victor M.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the MR contrast enhancement produced by ionic and nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in herniated disk fragments with that in epidural scar tissue. METHODS: A recurrent herniated disk was modeled in canines by using laminectomy to place a fragment of disk cartilage in the epidural space. The dogs were studied 88 and 90 days after laminectomy with MR imaging enhanced with an ionic or a nonionic paramagnetic contrast medium. Contrast enhancement of the epidural scar tissue and the epidural disk fragment was measured at 2, 22, and 45 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was consistently and significantly higher in scar tissue than in disk fragments, although the difference decreased between 2 and 45 minutes after administration of contrast medium. Enhancement of disk fragments was less with the ionic than with the nonionic contrast medium. Contrast between the disk fragments and scar was also greater with the ionic than with the nonionic medium. CONCLUSIONS: The contrast between recurrent disk fragments and scar tissue is affected by the timing of the scan and the choice of contrast medium. Scans obtained immediately after the injection of contrast medium show more contrast between disk fragment and scar than do delayed scans. Recurrent herniated disk fragments are more effectively shown by ionic than by nonionic media.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the MR contrast enhancement produced by ionic and nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in herniated disk fragments with that in epidural scar tissue. METHODS: A recurrent herniated disk was modeled in canines by using laminectomy to place a fragment of disk cartilage in the epidural space. The dogs were studied 88 and 90 days after laminectomy with MR imaging enhanced with an ionic or a nonionic paramagnetic contrast medium. Contrast enhancement of the epidural scar tissue and the epidural disk fragment was measured at 2, 22, and 45 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was consistently and significantly higher in scar tissue than in disk fragments, although the difference decreased between 2 and 45 minutes after administration of contrast medium. Enhancement of disk fragments was less with the ionic than with the nonionic contrast medium. Contrast between the disk fragments and scar was also greater with the ionic than with the nonionic medium. CONCLUSIONS: The contrast between recurrent disk fragments and scar tissue is affected by the timing of the scan and the choice of contrast medium. Scans obtained immediately after the injection of contrast medium show more contrast between disk fragment and scar than do delayed scans. Recurrent herniated disk fragments are more effectively shown by ionic than by nonionic media.

KW - Animal studies

KW - Magnetic resonance, contrast enhancement

KW - Spine, intervertebral disks, herniation

KW - Spine, magnetic resonance

KW - Spine, scar tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029968675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029968675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8881245

AN - SCOPUS:0029968675

VL - 17

SP - 501

EP - 505

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 3

ER -