Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking

Ryan Anderson, Andras Lasso, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad, Gabor Fichtinger

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

PURPOSE: Low cost portable ultrasound systems could see improved utility if similarly low cost portable trackers were developed. Permanent magnet based tracking systems potentially offer adequate tracking accuracy in a small workspace suitable for ultrasound image reconstruction. In this study the use of simple permanent magnet tracking techniques is investigated to determine feasibility for use in an ultrasound tracking system. METHODS: Permanent magnet tracking requires finding a position input into a field model which minimizes the error between the measured field, and the field expected from the model. A simulator was developed in MATLAB to determine the effect of sources of error in permanent magnet tracking systems. Insights from the simulations were used to develop a calibration and tracking experiment to determine the accuracy of a simple and low cost permanent magnet tracking system. RESULTS: Simulation and experimental results show permanent magnet based tracking to be highly sensitive to errors in sensor measurements, calibration and experimental setup. The reduction in field strength of permanent magnets lowers with the cube of distance, which leads to very poor signal-to-noise ratios at distances above 20 cm. Small errors in experimental setup also led to high tracking error. CONCLUSION: Permanent magnet tracking was found to be less accurate than is clinically useful, and highly sensitive to errors in sensors and experimental setup. Sensor and calibration limitations make simple permanent magnet tracking systems a poor choice given the present state of sensor technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMedical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
PublisherSPIE
Volume9786
ISBN (Electronic)9781510600218
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
EventMedical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling - San Diego, United States
Duration: Feb 28 2016Mar 1 2016

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period2/28/163/1/16

Fingerprint

Magnets
permanent magnets
Permanent magnets
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
Calibration
Ultrasonics
Sensors
sensors
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Image reconstruction
MATLAB
Signal to noise ratio
Research Design
image reconstruction
Simulators
simulators
Technology
field strength

Keywords

  • computer assisted surgery
  • magnetometer
  • tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Anderson, R., Lasso, A., Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., & Fichtinger, G. (2016). Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking. In Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling (Vol. 9786). [97862F] SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217189

Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking. / Anderson, Ryan; Lasso, Andras; Hashtrudi-Zaad, Keyvan; Fichtinger, Gabor.

Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Vol. 9786 SPIE, 2016. 97862F.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Anderson, R, Lasso, A, Hashtrudi-Zaad, K & Fichtinger, G 2016, Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking. in Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. vol. 9786, 97862F, SPIE, Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, San Diego, United States, 2/28/16. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217189
Anderson R, Lasso A, Hashtrudi-Zaad K, Fichtinger G. Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking. In Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Vol. 9786. SPIE. 2016. 97862F https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217189
Anderson, Ryan ; Lasso, Andras ; Hashtrudi-Zaad, Keyvan ; Fichtinger, Gabor. / Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking. Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Vol. 9786 SPIE, 2016.
@inproceedings{a8cbc5a5ed5149bab552cec79ac71805,
title = "Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Low cost portable ultrasound systems could see improved utility if similarly low cost portable trackers were developed. Permanent magnet based tracking systems potentially offer adequate tracking accuracy in a small workspace suitable for ultrasound image reconstruction. In this study the use of simple permanent magnet tracking techniques is investigated to determine feasibility for use in an ultrasound tracking system. METHODS: Permanent magnet tracking requires finding a position input into a field model which minimizes the error between the measured field, and the field expected from the model. A simulator was developed in MATLAB to determine the effect of sources of error in permanent magnet tracking systems. Insights from the simulations were used to develop a calibration and tracking experiment to determine the accuracy of a simple and low cost permanent magnet tracking system. RESULTS: Simulation and experimental results show permanent magnet based tracking to be highly sensitive to errors in sensor measurements, calibration and experimental setup. The reduction in field strength of permanent magnets lowers with the cube of distance, which leads to very poor signal-to-noise ratios at distances above 20 cm. Small errors in experimental setup also led to high tracking error. CONCLUSION: Permanent magnet tracking was found to be less accurate than is clinically useful, and highly sensitive to errors in sensors and experimental setup. Sensor and calibration limitations make simple permanent magnet tracking systems a poor choice given the present state of sensor technology.",
keywords = "computer assisted surgery, magnetometer, tracking",
author = "Ryan Anderson and Andras Lasso and Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad and Gabor Fichtinger",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1117/12.2217189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9786",
booktitle = "Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling",
publisher = "SPIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Investigation of permanent magnets in low-cost position tracking

AU - Anderson, Ryan

AU - Lasso, Andras

AU - Hashtrudi-Zaad, Keyvan

AU - Fichtinger, Gabor

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - PURPOSE: Low cost portable ultrasound systems could see improved utility if similarly low cost portable trackers were developed. Permanent magnet based tracking systems potentially offer adequate tracking accuracy in a small workspace suitable for ultrasound image reconstruction. In this study the use of simple permanent magnet tracking techniques is investigated to determine feasibility for use in an ultrasound tracking system. METHODS: Permanent magnet tracking requires finding a position input into a field model which minimizes the error between the measured field, and the field expected from the model. A simulator was developed in MATLAB to determine the effect of sources of error in permanent magnet tracking systems. Insights from the simulations were used to develop a calibration and tracking experiment to determine the accuracy of a simple and low cost permanent magnet tracking system. RESULTS: Simulation and experimental results show permanent magnet based tracking to be highly sensitive to errors in sensor measurements, calibration and experimental setup. The reduction in field strength of permanent magnets lowers with the cube of distance, which leads to very poor signal-to-noise ratios at distances above 20 cm. Small errors in experimental setup also led to high tracking error. CONCLUSION: Permanent magnet tracking was found to be less accurate than is clinically useful, and highly sensitive to errors in sensors and experimental setup. Sensor and calibration limitations make simple permanent magnet tracking systems a poor choice given the present state of sensor technology.

AB - PURPOSE: Low cost portable ultrasound systems could see improved utility if similarly low cost portable trackers were developed. Permanent magnet based tracking systems potentially offer adequate tracking accuracy in a small workspace suitable for ultrasound image reconstruction. In this study the use of simple permanent magnet tracking techniques is investigated to determine feasibility for use in an ultrasound tracking system. METHODS: Permanent magnet tracking requires finding a position input into a field model which minimizes the error between the measured field, and the field expected from the model. A simulator was developed in MATLAB to determine the effect of sources of error in permanent magnet tracking systems. Insights from the simulations were used to develop a calibration and tracking experiment to determine the accuracy of a simple and low cost permanent magnet tracking system. RESULTS: Simulation and experimental results show permanent magnet based tracking to be highly sensitive to errors in sensor measurements, calibration and experimental setup. The reduction in field strength of permanent magnets lowers with the cube of distance, which leads to very poor signal-to-noise ratios at distances above 20 cm. Small errors in experimental setup also led to high tracking error. CONCLUSION: Permanent magnet tracking was found to be less accurate than is clinically useful, and highly sensitive to errors in sensors and experimental setup. Sensor and calibration limitations make simple permanent magnet tracking systems a poor choice given the present state of sensor technology.

KW - computer assisted surgery

KW - magnetometer

KW - tracking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982182543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982182543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.2217189

DO - 10.1117/12.2217189

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84982182543

VL - 9786

BT - Medical Imaging 2016: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling

PB - SPIE

ER -