Introduction: State-of-the-art on child health disparities

Tina L Cheng, Rachel Moon, Ivor Horn, Renee Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

COUNTINGTO100:Haveyouever sentanangry email? Ihave doneso too often.The usual scenario is that I have gotten an email that has incensedmeand I immediately reply - often with some fire and brimstone. That has never worked out in my favor. While I might feel a bit better after sending the email, the feeling is quite transient and the missive usually comes back to haunt me. As reported in The Wall Street Journal (Life: August 10, 2015), this "e-venting" (venting on social media or through email, text, or chat) is a bad idea. Many people think that by venting they will feel better. However, it turns out that venting actually makes people become angrier and more aggressive. Those that e-vent anonymously are at risk for becoming the most angry or aggressive. In a study completed years ago, 600 college students were deliberately given harsh feedback on an essay. After receiving the feedback the students were divided into three groups: those that hit a punching bag and ruminated on the feedback; those that hit a punching bag and thought about getting fit; and a third group that did nothing. They were then asked their feelings. The group that ruminated while punching turned out to be the angriest,while the group that had done nothingwas the least angry or aggressive. Unfortunately, technologyhasmadeventingsomucheasier.Atleastwhenonehadto telephone, onehadtomakedirect contactandreceived direct verbalandnon-verbal cues.Now, manyfeel they can hide behind the technology. There is a huge difference, though. Once you hung up the phone, the conversation was over. Now, an email, tweet, or Facebook posting can be forwarded, re-tweeted, re-posted and cannot be erased. So, now when I get an email from someone that immediately sendsmy blood pressure through the roof, I count to 100 and then count again. If I write an email, and still feel I am angry, I delete it. Writing the response the next day, in much more measured tones, always works out better in the end.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)730-731
Number of pages2
JournalPediatrics
Volume136
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Emotions
Students
Social Media
Child Health
Telephone
Cues
Blood Pressure
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Introduction : State-of-the-art on child health disparities. / Cheng, Tina L; Moon, Rachel; Horn, Ivor; Jenkins, Renee.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 136, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 730-731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Tina L ; Moon, Rachel ; Horn, Ivor ; Jenkins, Renee. / Introduction : State-of-the-art on child health disparities. In: Pediatrics. 2015 ; Vol. 136, No. 4. pp. 730-731.
@article{a7e32dfabb9b4660b0d77867a8fc3d22,
title = "Introduction: State-of-the-art on child health disparities",
abstract = "COUNTINGTO100:Haveyouever sentanangry email? Ihave doneso too often.The usual scenario is that I have gotten an email that has incensedmeand I immediately reply - often with some fire and brimstone. That has never worked out in my favor. While I might feel a bit better after sending the email, the feeling is quite transient and the missive usually comes back to haunt me. As reported in The Wall Street Journal (Life: August 10, 2015), this {"}e-venting{"} (venting on social media or through email, text, or chat) is a bad idea. Many people think that by venting they will feel better. However, it turns out that venting actually makes people become angrier and more aggressive. Those that e-vent anonymously are at risk for becoming the most angry or aggressive. In a study completed years ago, 600 college students were deliberately given harsh feedback on an essay. After receiving the feedback the students were divided into three groups: those that hit a punching bag and ruminated on the feedback; those that hit a punching bag and thought about getting fit; and a third group that did nothing. They were then asked their feelings. The group that ruminated while punching turned out to be the angriest,while the group that had done nothingwas the least angry or aggressive. Unfortunately, technologyhasmadeventingsomucheasier.Atleastwhenonehadto telephone, onehadtomakedirect contactandreceived direct verbalandnon-verbal cues.Now, manyfeel they can hide behind the technology. There is a huge difference, though. Once you hung up the phone, the conversation was over. Now, an email, tweet, or Facebook posting can be forwarded, re-tweeted, re-posted and cannot be erased. So, now when I get an email from someone that immediately sendsmy blood pressure through the roof, I count to 100 and then count again. If I write an email, and still feel I am angry, I delete it. Writing the response the next day, in much more measured tones, always works out better in the end.",
author = "Cheng, {Tina L} and Rachel Moon and Ivor Horn and Renee Jenkins",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2014-3862",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "730--731",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

T2 - State-of-the-art on child health disparities

AU - Cheng, Tina L

AU - Moon, Rachel

AU - Horn, Ivor

AU - Jenkins, Renee

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - COUNTINGTO100:Haveyouever sentanangry email? Ihave doneso too often.The usual scenario is that I have gotten an email that has incensedmeand I immediately reply - often with some fire and brimstone. That has never worked out in my favor. While I might feel a bit better after sending the email, the feeling is quite transient and the missive usually comes back to haunt me. As reported in The Wall Street Journal (Life: August 10, 2015), this "e-venting" (venting on social media or through email, text, or chat) is a bad idea. Many people think that by venting they will feel better. However, it turns out that venting actually makes people become angrier and more aggressive. Those that e-vent anonymously are at risk for becoming the most angry or aggressive. In a study completed years ago, 600 college students were deliberately given harsh feedback on an essay. After receiving the feedback the students were divided into three groups: those that hit a punching bag and ruminated on the feedback; those that hit a punching bag and thought about getting fit; and a third group that did nothing. They were then asked their feelings. The group that ruminated while punching turned out to be the angriest,while the group that had done nothingwas the least angry or aggressive. Unfortunately, technologyhasmadeventingsomucheasier.Atleastwhenonehadto telephone, onehadtomakedirect contactandreceived direct verbalandnon-verbal cues.Now, manyfeel they can hide behind the technology. There is a huge difference, though. Once you hung up the phone, the conversation was over. Now, an email, tweet, or Facebook posting can be forwarded, re-tweeted, re-posted and cannot be erased. So, now when I get an email from someone that immediately sendsmy blood pressure through the roof, I count to 100 and then count again. If I write an email, and still feel I am angry, I delete it. Writing the response the next day, in much more measured tones, always works out better in the end.

AB - COUNTINGTO100:Haveyouever sentanangry email? Ihave doneso too often.The usual scenario is that I have gotten an email that has incensedmeand I immediately reply - often with some fire and brimstone. That has never worked out in my favor. While I might feel a bit better after sending the email, the feeling is quite transient and the missive usually comes back to haunt me. As reported in The Wall Street Journal (Life: August 10, 2015), this "e-venting" (venting on social media or through email, text, or chat) is a bad idea. Many people think that by venting they will feel better. However, it turns out that venting actually makes people become angrier and more aggressive. Those that e-vent anonymously are at risk for becoming the most angry or aggressive. In a study completed years ago, 600 college students were deliberately given harsh feedback on an essay. After receiving the feedback the students were divided into three groups: those that hit a punching bag and ruminated on the feedback; those that hit a punching bag and thought about getting fit; and a third group that did nothing. They were then asked their feelings. The group that ruminated while punching turned out to be the angriest,while the group that had done nothingwas the least angry or aggressive. Unfortunately, technologyhasmadeventingsomucheasier.Atleastwhenonehadto telephone, onehadtomakedirect contactandreceived direct verbalandnon-verbal cues.Now, manyfeel they can hide behind the technology. There is a huge difference, though. Once you hung up the phone, the conversation was over. Now, an email, tweet, or Facebook posting can be forwarded, re-tweeted, re-posted and cannot be erased. So, now when I get an email from someone that immediately sendsmy blood pressure through the roof, I count to 100 and then count again. If I write an email, and still feel I am angry, I delete it. Writing the response the next day, in much more measured tones, always works out better in the end.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942924486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942924486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2014-3862

DO - 10.1542/peds.2014-3862

M3 - Article

C2 - 26371200

AN - SCOPUS:84942924486

VL - 136

SP - 730

EP - 731

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 4

ER -