Introduction of checklists at daily progress notes improves patient care among the gynecological oncology service

Teresa P. Diaz-Montes, Lauren Cobb, Okechukwu A. Ibeanu, Patricia Njoku, Melissa A. Gerardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of checklists at the daily progress note to improve patient care among gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: A progress note incorporating checklists that were pertinent for our patient population was developed with input obtained from all staff involved on patients care. The form was approved by the hospital. The average length of stay, compliance with prophylactic guidelines (anticoagulation, peptic ulcer disease), reason for admission, and readmission rate were compared among the preimplementation and postimplementation periods. RESULTS: A total of 492 discharge summaries were evaluated through the study period (267 for the preimplementation period and 225 for the postimplementation period). The mean length of stay was of 4.46 days for the preimplementation and 3.46 days for the postimplementation period (P = 0.007). TEDs/SCDs were not used in 9.3% of the patients in the pre group versus 0.6% in the post group (P <0.001). DVT prophylaxis was given to 30.1% of the pre group versus 34.8% of the post group (P = 0.0013). The administration of PUD prophylaxis also increased from 28.3% in the pre group to 40.2% of the post group (P <0.001). There was a decrease in the nonsurgical admissions from 22.2% in the pre group versus 14.6% in the post group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The use of checklists in daily progress notes enhances patient care by improving the delivery of routine care that is often overlooked in the light of major medical issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-193
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Checklist
Patient Care
Length of Stay
Peptic Ulcer
Guidelines
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Introduction of checklists at daily progress notes improves patient care among the gynecological oncology service. / Diaz-Montes, Teresa P.; Cobb, Lauren; Ibeanu, Okechukwu A.; Njoku, Patricia; Gerardi, Melissa A.

In: Journal of Patient Safety, Vol. 8, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 189-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diaz-Montes, Teresa P. ; Cobb, Lauren ; Ibeanu, Okechukwu A. ; Njoku, Patricia ; Gerardi, Melissa A. / Introduction of checklists at daily progress notes improves patient care among the gynecological oncology service. In: Journal of Patient Safety. 2012 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 189-193.
@article{6de3f396dcf64a9a9ca90018c63e8181,
title = "Introduction of checklists at daily progress notes improves patient care among the gynecological oncology service",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of checklists at the daily progress note to improve patient care among gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: A progress note incorporating checklists that were pertinent for our patient population was developed with input obtained from all staff involved on patients care. The form was approved by the hospital. The average length of stay, compliance with prophylactic guidelines (anticoagulation, peptic ulcer disease), reason for admission, and readmission rate were compared among the preimplementation and postimplementation periods. RESULTS: A total of 492 discharge summaries were evaluated through the study period (267 for the preimplementation period and 225 for the postimplementation period). The mean length of stay was of 4.46 days for the preimplementation and 3.46 days for the postimplementation period (P = 0.007). TEDs/SCDs were not used in 9.3{\%} of the patients in the pre group versus 0.6{\%} in the post group (P <0.001). DVT prophylaxis was given to 30.1{\%} of the pre group versus 34.8{\%} of the post group (P = 0.0013). The administration of PUD prophylaxis also increased from 28.3{\%} in the pre group to 40.2{\%} of the post group (P <0.001). There was a decrease in the nonsurgical admissions from 22.2{\%} in the pre group versus 14.6{\%} in the post group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The use of checklists in daily progress notes enhances patient care by improving the delivery of routine care that is often overlooked in the light of major medical issues.",
author = "Diaz-Montes, {Teresa P.} and Lauren Cobb and Ibeanu, {Okechukwu A.} and Patricia Njoku and Gerardi, {Melissa A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/PTS.0b013e318269896f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "189--193",
journal = "Journal of Patient Safety",
issn = "1549-8417",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction of checklists at daily progress notes improves patient care among the gynecological oncology service

AU - Diaz-Montes, Teresa P.

AU - Cobb, Lauren

AU - Ibeanu, Okechukwu A.

AU - Njoku, Patricia

AU - Gerardi, Melissa A.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of checklists at the daily progress note to improve patient care among gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: A progress note incorporating checklists that were pertinent for our patient population was developed with input obtained from all staff involved on patients care. The form was approved by the hospital. The average length of stay, compliance with prophylactic guidelines (anticoagulation, peptic ulcer disease), reason for admission, and readmission rate were compared among the preimplementation and postimplementation periods. RESULTS: A total of 492 discharge summaries were evaluated through the study period (267 for the preimplementation period and 225 for the postimplementation period). The mean length of stay was of 4.46 days for the preimplementation and 3.46 days for the postimplementation period (P = 0.007). TEDs/SCDs were not used in 9.3% of the patients in the pre group versus 0.6% in the post group (P <0.001). DVT prophylaxis was given to 30.1% of the pre group versus 34.8% of the post group (P = 0.0013). The administration of PUD prophylaxis also increased from 28.3% in the pre group to 40.2% of the post group (P <0.001). There was a decrease in the nonsurgical admissions from 22.2% in the pre group versus 14.6% in the post group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The use of checklists in daily progress notes enhances patient care by improving the delivery of routine care that is often overlooked in the light of major medical issues.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of checklists at the daily progress note to improve patient care among gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: A progress note incorporating checklists that were pertinent for our patient population was developed with input obtained from all staff involved on patients care. The form was approved by the hospital. The average length of stay, compliance with prophylactic guidelines (anticoagulation, peptic ulcer disease), reason for admission, and readmission rate were compared among the preimplementation and postimplementation periods. RESULTS: A total of 492 discharge summaries were evaluated through the study period (267 for the preimplementation period and 225 for the postimplementation period). The mean length of stay was of 4.46 days for the preimplementation and 3.46 days for the postimplementation period (P = 0.007). TEDs/SCDs were not used in 9.3% of the patients in the pre group versus 0.6% in the post group (P <0.001). DVT prophylaxis was given to 30.1% of the pre group versus 34.8% of the post group (P = 0.0013). The administration of PUD prophylaxis also increased from 28.3% in the pre group to 40.2% of the post group (P <0.001). There was a decrease in the nonsurgical admissions from 22.2% in the pre group versus 14.6% in the post group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The use of checklists in daily progress notes enhances patient care by improving the delivery of routine care that is often overlooked in the light of major medical issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870557576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870557576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318269896f

DO - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318269896f

M3 - Article

C2 - 23007241

AN - SCOPUS:84870557576

VL - 8

SP - 189

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Patient Safety

JF - Journal of Patient Safety

SN - 1549-8417

IS - 4

ER -