Introduction and geographic availability of new antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014

Cecilia Kallberg, Christine Ardal, Hege Salvesen Blix, Eili Klein, Elena M. Martinez, Morten Lindbæk, Kevin Outterson, John Arne Røttingen, Ramanan Laxminarayan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Despite the urgent need for new, effective antibiotics, few antibiotics of value have entered the market during the past decades. Therefore, incentives have been developed to stimulate antibiotic R&D. For these incentives to be effective, geographic availability for recently approved antibiotics needs to be better understood. In this study, we analyze geographic availability and market introduction of antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014. Material and method We identified antibiotics, considered new chemical entities (NCEs) for systemic use approved globally between 1999 and 2014, from national medicine agencies' lists of approved drugs, and data from the WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics. Geographic availability was mapped using sales data from IQVIA, and analyzed with regards to class, indication, safety, and origin. Results Of the 25 identified NCEs, only 12 had registered sales in more than 10 countries. NCEs with the widest geographic availability had registered sales in more than 70 countries within a ten-year timeframe and 30 countries within a three-year timeframe, spreading across five different geographic regions and three country income classes. Half (52%) of the NCEs had an indication for infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, little diversity was seen regarding target pathogen and indication. Antibiotics originated from and/or marketed by companies from the US or Europe had greater geographic availability compared to Japanese antibiotics, which seldom reached outside of Asia. For 20 NCEs developers chose to fully or partially sublicense marketing rights to a number of companies of different sizes. Conclusion Our findings show great variation in geographic availability of antibiotics, indicating that availability in multiple regions and country income classes is possible, but rarely seen within a few years of market authorization. Sublicensing agreements between multiple companies was common practice. Moreover, differences were seen between countries regarding benefit/ risk evaluations and company behavior. These findings could be a potential source of uncertainties, and create barriers to assure that working antibiotics are developed and made available according to public health needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0205166
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Kallberg, C., Ardal, C., Blix, H. S., Klein, E., Martinez, E. M., Lindbæk, M., Outterson, K., Røttingen, J. A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2018). Introduction and geographic availability of new antibiotics approved between 1999 and 2014. PLoS One, 13(10), [e0205166]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205166