Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Pediatric and Adult Spine Deformity Surgery

Sophia A. Strike, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Amit Jain, Khaled M. Kebaish, Dolores B. Njoku, Daniel Becker, Michael C. Ain, Paul D. Sponseller

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Study Design: Review of techniques and description of institutional clinical experience. Objective: To provide a historical review and description of key neuromonitoring concepts, focusing on neurogenic motor-evoked potentials and descending neurogenic evoked potentials, and to review the authors' experience with neuromonitoring techniques in children and adults undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Summary of Background Data: The original form of neuromonitoring, the Stagnara wake-up test, remains the "gold standard" for detecting true neurological deficits. Multiple newer modalities involving cortical and muscular monitoring, such as somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials, have been developed and are widely used. Descending and neurogenic evoked potentials are becoming more common for neuromonitoring in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A PubMed search for literature related to "neuromonitoring" was performed, and recent, as well as historical, articles were reviewed. Clinical experience regarding the use of neuromonitoring in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery was obtained from institutional experts. Results: Although not regularly used, the Stagnara wake-up test remains the gold standard for detecting neurological injury. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure signals transmitted from the periphery to the cortex and have historically been widely used but are limited by delay, poor localization, and the inability to detect damage to motor tracts. Motor evoked potentials continue to be used widely and measure muscular activity after cortical stimulation, but they are difficult to interpret in patients with underlying motor disorders and cannot be continuously monitored. Newer techniques such as descending neurogenic evoked potentials and neurogenic motor evoked potentials monitoring are used at some high-volume centers. Conclusions: Familiarity with the history of neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery and an understanding of the physiological systems used for neuromonitoring provide a framework from which spine surgeons can select appropriate monitoring for their patients.

LanguageEnglish (US)
PagesE1174-E1181
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Motor Evoked Potentials
Spine
Pediatrics
Evoked Potentials
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Physiologic Monitoring
PubMed
History
Wounds and Injuries
Recognition (Psychology)
Motor Disorders
Surgeons

Keywords

  • adult
  • intraoperative neuromonitoring
  • neurological injury
  • pediatric
  • spine deformity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Pediatric and Adult Spine Deformity Surgery. / Strike, Sophia A.; Hassanzadeh, Hamid; Jain, Amit; Kebaish, Khaled M.; Njoku, Dolores B.; Becker, Daniel; Ain, Michael C.; Sponseller, Paul D.

In: Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 30, No. 9, 2017, p. E1174-E1181.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{c2af6efb06e54209b4b3a403b57a051d,
title = "Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Pediatric and Adult Spine Deformity Surgery",
abstract = "Study Design: Review of techniques and description of institutional clinical experience. Objective: To provide a historical review and description of key neuromonitoring concepts, focusing on neurogenic motor-evoked potentials and descending neurogenic evoked potentials, and to review the authors' experience with neuromonitoring techniques in children and adults undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Summary of Background Data: The original form of neuromonitoring, the Stagnara wake-up test, remains the {"}gold standard{"} for detecting true neurological deficits. Multiple newer modalities involving cortical and muscular monitoring, such as somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials, have been developed and are widely used. Descending and neurogenic evoked potentials are becoming more common for neuromonitoring in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A PubMed search for literature related to {"}neuromonitoring{"} was performed, and recent, as well as historical, articles were reviewed. Clinical experience regarding the use of neuromonitoring in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery was obtained from institutional experts. Results: Although not regularly used, the Stagnara wake-up test remains the gold standard for detecting neurological injury. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure signals transmitted from the periphery to the cortex and have historically been widely used but are limited by delay, poor localization, and the inability to detect damage to motor tracts. Motor evoked potentials continue to be used widely and measure muscular activity after cortical stimulation, but they are difficult to interpret in patients with underlying motor disorders and cannot be continuously monitored. Newer techniques such as descending neurogenic evoked potentials and neurogenic motor evoked potentials monitoring are used at some high-volume centers. Conclusions: Familiarity with the history of neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery and an understanding of the physiological systems used for neuromonitoring provide a framework from which spine surgeons can select appropriate monitoring for their patients.",
keywords = "adult, intraoperative neuromonitoring, neurological injury, pediatric, spine deformity",
author = "Strike, {Sophia A.} and Hamid Hassanzadeh and Amit Jain and Kebaish, {Khaled M.} and Njoku, {Dolores B.} and Daniel Becker and Ain, {Michael C.} and Sponseller, {Paul D.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0000000000000388",
volume = "30",
pages = "E1174--E1181",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Pediatric and Adult Spine Deformity Surgery

AU - Strike,Sophia A.

AU - Hassanzadeh,Hamid

AU - Jain,Amit

AU - Kebaish,Khaled M.

AU - Njoku,Dolores B.

AU - Becker,Daniel

AU - Ain,Michael C.

AU - Sponseller,Paul D.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Study Design: Review of techniques and description of institutional clinical experience. Objective: To provide a historical review and description of key neuromonitoring concepts, focusing on neurogenic motor-evoked potentials and descending neurogenic evoked potentials, and to review the authors' experience with neuromonitoring techniques in children and adults undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Summary of Background Data: The original form of neuromonitoring, the Stagnara wake-up test, remains the "gold standard" for detecting true neurological deficits. Multiple newer modalities involving cortical and muscular monitoring, such as somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials, have been developed and are widely used. Descending and neurogenic evoked potentials are becoming more common for neuromonitoring in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A PubMed search for literature related to "neuromonitoring" was performed, and recent, as well as historical, articles were reviewed. Clinical experience regarding the use of neuromonitoring in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery was obtained from institutional experts. Results: Although not regularly used, the Stagnara wake-up test remains the gold standard for detecting neurological injury. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure signals transmitted from the periphery to the cortex and have historically been widely used but are limited by delay, poor localization, and the inability to detect damage to motor tracts. Motor evoked potentials continue to be used widely and measure muscular activity after cortical stimulation, but they are difficult to interpret in patients with underlying motor disorders and cannot be continuously monitored. Newer techniques such as descending neurogenic evoked potentials and neurogenic motor evoked potentials monitoring are used at some high-volume centers. Conclusions: Familiarity with the history of neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery and an understanding of the physiological systems used for neuromonitoring provide a framework from which spine surgeons can select appropriate monitoring for their patients.

AB - Study Design: Review of techniques and description of institutional clinical experience. Objective: To provide a historical review and description of key neuromonitoring concepts, focusing on neurogenic motor-evoked potentials and descending neurogenic evoked potentials, and to review the authors' experience with neuromonitoring techniques in children and adults undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Summary of Background Data: The original form of neuromonitoring, the Stagnara wake-up test, remains the "gold standard" for detecting true neurological deficits. Multiple newer modalities involving cortical and muscular monitoring, such as somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials, have been developed and are widely used. Descending and neurogenic evoked potentials are becoming more common for neuromonitoring in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A PubMed search for literature related to "neuromonitoring" was performed, and recent, as well as historical, articles were reviewed. Clinical experience regarding the use of neuromonitoring in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery was obtained from institutional experts. Results: Although not regularly used, the Stagnara wake-up test remains the gold standard for detecting neurological injury. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure signals transmitted from the periphery to the cortex and have historically been widely used but are limited by delay, poor localization, and the inability to detect damage to motor tracts. Motor evoked potentials continue to be used widely and measure muscular activity after cortical stimulation, but they are difficult to interpret in patients with underlying motor disorders and cannot be continuously monitored. Newer techniques such as descending neurogenic evoked potentials and neurogenic motor evoked potentials monitoring are used at some high-volume centers. Conclusions: Familiarity with the history of neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery and an understanding of the physiological systems used for neuromonitoring provide a framework from which spine surgeons can select appropriate monitoring for their patients.

KW - adult

KW - intraoperative neuromonitoring

KW - neurological injury

KW - pediatric

KW - spine deformity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032257550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032257550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000388

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000388

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - E1174-E1181

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

T2 - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 9

ER -