Intraoperative MR systems

Low-field approaches

Jonathan S. Lewin, Andrew K. Metzger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerous different concepts in low- and mid-field intervention have been described and applied for percutaneous intervention and intraoperative MR imaging, and each has demonstrated usefulness in specific applications. As the use of interventional methods under MR imaging expands, the imaging systems used for intervention will continue to evolve. More than likely, different system designs will be advocated for different interventional applications. The ultimate choice of interventional system will depend on each institution's optimal balance among the types of procedures to be performed, the required image quality, and the financial constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-628
Number of pages18
JournalNeuroimaging Clinics of North America
Volume11
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Lewin, J. S., & Metzger, A. K. (2001). Intraoperative MR systems: Low-field approaches. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 11(4), 611-628.

Intraoperative MR systems : Low-field approaches. / Lewin, Jonathan S.; Metzger, Andrew K.

In: Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2001, p. 611-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewin, JS & Metzger, AK 2001, 'Intraoperative MR systems: Low-field approaches', Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 611-628.
Lewin, Jonathan S. ; Metzger, Andrew K. / Intraoperative MR systems : Low-field approaches. In: Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 611-628.
@article{174f9aa39eab46d98d74564df298238a,
title = "Intraoperative MR systems: Low-field approaches",
abstract = "Numerous different concepts in low- and mid-field intervention have been described and applied for percutaneous intervention and intraoperative MR imaging, and each has demonstrated usefulness in specific applications. As the use of interventional methods under MR imaging expands, the imaging systems used for intervention will continue to evolve. More than likely, different system designs will be advocated for different interventional applications. The ultimate choice of interventional system will depend on each institution's optimal balance among the types of procedures to be performed, the required image quality, and the financial constraints.",
author = "Lewin, {Jonathan S.} and Metzger, {Andrew K.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "611--628",
journal = "Neuroimaging Clinics of North America",
issn = "1052-5149",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative MR systems

T2 - Low-field approaches

AU - Lewin, Jonathan S.

AU - Metzger, Andrew K.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Numerous different concepts in low- and mid-field intervention have been described and applied for percutaneous intervention and intraoperative MR imaging, and each has demonstrated usefulness in specific applications. As the use of interventional methods under MR imaging expands, the imaging systems used for intervention will continue to evolve. More than likely, different system designs will be advocated for different interventional applications. The ultimate choice of interventional system will depend on each institution's optimal balance among the types of procedures to be performed, the required image quality, and the financial constraints.

AB - Numerous different concepts in low- and mid-field intervention have been described and applied for percutaneous intervention and intraoperative MR imaging, and each has demonstrated usefulness in specific applications. As the use of interventional methods under MR imaging expands, the imaging systems used for intervention will continue to evolve. More than likely, different system designs will be advocated for different interventional applications. The ultimate choice of interventional system will depend on each institution's optimal balance among the types of procedures to be performed, the required image quality, and the financial constraints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035711115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035711115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 611

EP - 628

JO - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

JF - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

SN - 1052-5149

IS - 4

ER -