Intraocular Pressure Measurements Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

Thasarat S. Vajaranant, Marianne O. Price, Francis W. Price, Jacob T. Wilensky, Deepak P. Edward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement has not been previously studied. It is uncertain if this increase in corneal thickness would artificially elevate IOP reading by Goldmann tonometry [GAT] (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland). Therefore the effect of DSEK-related thick cornea on IOP measurement was investigated using three different techniques. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants were recruited from a single tertiary referral center. Fifty eyes of 38 patients with successful DSEK at least three months prior to testing were evaluated. At the time of the study, none of the participants had clinically detectable corneal edema. IOP was measured with GAT, pneumatonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in an unmasked randomized sequence. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: Mean CCT was 701 ± 68 μm. The mean IOP ± standard deviation (SD) was 15.9 ± 4.9 mm Hg for GAT, 20.3 ± 4.5 mm Hg for pneumatonometry, and 19.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg for DCT. Pneumatonometry and DCT IOP measurements were significant higher than GAT (P <.01). In contrast, the difference between pneumatonometry and DCT readings was not statistically significant (P = .28). The correlations between IOP and corneal thickness were not significant in this cohort (P > .05). Conclusions: Falsely elevated GAT, as expected in thick corneas, was not demonstrated after DSEK. High IOP reading by GAT therefore should raise suspicion of elevated IOP in DSEK eyes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume145
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
Manometry
Intraocular Pressure
Cornea
Reading
Corneal Edema
Time and Motion Studies
Switzerland
Tertiary Care Centers
Ultrasonics
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Intraocular Pressure Measurements Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty. / Vajaranant, Thasarat S.; Price, Marianne O.; Price, Francis W.; Wilensky, Jacob T.; Edward, Deepak P.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 145, No. 5, 05.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vajaranant, Thasarat S. ; Price, Marianne O. ; Price, Francis W. ; Wilensky, Jacob T. ; Edward, Deepak P. / Intraocular Pressure Measurements Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008 ; Vol. 145, No. 5.
@article{1a632ce01a154f9b833114b4ce74185f,
title = "Intraocular Pressure Measurements Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty",
abstract = "Purpose: The effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement has not been previously studied. It is uncertain if this increase in corneal thickness would artificially elevate IOP reading by Goldmann tonometry [GAT] (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland). Therefore the effect of DSEK-related thick cornea on IOP measurement was investigated using three different techniques. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants were recruited from a single tertiary referral center. Fifty eyes of 38 patients with successful DSEK at least three months prior to testing were evaluated. At the time of the study, none of the participants had clinically detectable corneal edema. IOP was measured with GAT, pneumatonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in an unmasked randomized sequence. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: Mean CCT was 701 ± 68 μm. The mean IOP ± standard deviation (SD) was 15.9 ± 4.9 mm Hg for GAT, 20.3 ± 4.5 mm Hg for pneumatonometry, and 19.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg for DCT. Pneumatonometry and DCT IOP measurements were significant higher than GAT (P <.01). In contrast, the difference between pneumatonometry and DCT readings was not statistically significant (P = .28). The correlations between IOP and corneal thickness were not significant in this cohort (P > .05). Conclusions: Falsely elevated GAT, as expected in thick corneas, was not demonstrated after DSEK. High IOP reading by GAT therefore should raise suspicion of elevated IOP in DSEK eyes.",
author = "Vajaranant, {Thasarat S.} and Price, {Marianne O.} and Price, {Francis W.} and Wilensky, {Jacob T.} and Edward, {Deepak P.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraocular Pressure Measurements Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

AU - Vajaranant, Thasarat S.

AU - Price, Marianne O.

AU - Price, Francis W.

AU - Wilensky, Jacob T.

AU - Edward, Deepak P.

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Purpose: The effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement has not been previously studied. It is uncertain if this increase in corneal thickness would artificially elevate IOP reading by Goldmann tonometry [GAT] (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland). Therefore the effect of DSEK-related thick cornea on IOP measurement was investigated using three different techniques. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants were recruited from a single tertiary referral center. Fifty eyes of 38 patients with successful DSEK at least three months prior to testing were evaluated. At the time of the study, none of the participants had clinically detectable corneal edema. IOP was measured with GAT, pneumatonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in an unmasked randomized sequence. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: Mean CCT was 701 ± 68 μm. The mean IOP ± standard deviation (SD) was 15.9 ± 4.9 mm Hg for GAT, 20.3 ± 4.5 mm Hg for pneumatonometry, and 19.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg for DCT. Pneumatonometry and DCT IOP measurements were significant higher than GAT (P <.01). In contrast, the difference between pneumatonometry and DCT readings was not statistically significant (P = .28). The correlations between IOP and corneal thickness were not significant in this cohort (P > .05). Conclusions: Falsely elevated GAT, as expected in thick corneas, was not demonstrated after DSEK. High IOP reading by GAT therefore should raise suspicion of elevated IOP in DSEK eyes.

AB - Purpose: The effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement has not been previously studied. It is uncertain if this increase in corneal thickness would artificially elevate IOP reading by Goldmann tonometry [GAT] (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland). Therefore the effect of DSEK-related thick cornea on IOP measurement was investigated using three different techniques. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants were recruited from a single tertiary referral center. Fifty eyes of 38 patients with successful DSEK at least three months prior to testing were evaluated. At the time of the study, none of the participants had clinically detectable corneal edema. IOP was measured with GAT, pneumatonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in an unmasked randomized sequence. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: Mean CCT was 701 ± 68 μm. The mean IOP ± standard deviation (SD) was 15.9 ± 4.9 mm Hg for GAT, 20.3 ± 4.5 mm Hg for pneumatonometry, and 19.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg for DCT. Pneumatonometry and DCT IOP measurements were significant higher than GAT (P <.01). In contrast, the difference between pneumatonometry and DCT readings was not statistically significant (P = .28). The correlations between IOP and corneal thickness were not significant in this cohort (P > .05). Conclusions: Falsely elevated GAT, as expected in thick corneas, was not demonstrated after DSEK. High IOP reading by GAT therefore should raise suspicion of elevated IOP in DSEK eyes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43049106401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43049106401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 18329627

AN - SCOPUS:43049106401

VL - 145

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 5

ER -