Abstract
In a double blind study no significant difference was found in intraocular pressure control, mean pressure or comparative binocular intraocular pressure difference between pilocarpine in adsorbobase compared to pilocarpine in 0.5% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose solution. Intraocular pressure control was achieved on fewer than 60% of visits using pilocarpine twice daily in either of the 2 vehicles. While pilocarpine retained some residual hypotensive effect 12 hours after application, twice-daily dosage with the solutions tested gave inadequate control for clinical usefulness.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 427-430 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Annals of ophthalmology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1977 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ophthalmology