Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection: Findings from indian husband-wife dyads

Michele R Decker, George R. Seage, David Hemenway, Anita Raj, Niranjan Saggurti, Donta Balaiah, Jay G. Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:: Female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) consistently demonstrate elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV prevalence. IPV is thought to function indirectly as a marker of abusive men's elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV infection and/or directly via facilitating transmission to wives. The present examination utilizes a nationally representative sample of married Indian couples to test these mechanisms and determine whether (1) abusive husbands demonstrate higher HIV infection prevalence compared with nonabusive husbands and (2) the risk of wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection varies as a function of their exposure to IPV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:: The Indian National Family Health Survey-3 was conducted across all Indian states in 2005-2006. Analyses were limited to 20,425 husband-wife dyads, which provided both IPV data and HIV test results. ANALYSES:: Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the following associations: (1) husbands' HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship based on their perpetration of IPV and (2) wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection, as a function of their IPV exposure. RESULTS:: One third (37.4%) of wives experienced IPV; 0.4% of husbands and 0.2% of wives were HIV infected. Compared with nonabusive husbands, abusive husbands demonstrated increased odds of HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95% CI 1.11 to 3.27). Husbands' HIV infection was associated with increased HIV risk among wives; this risk was elevated 7-fold in abusive relationships in adjusted models (AOR = 7.22; 95% CI 1.05 to 49.88). CONCLUSIONS:: Findings provide the first empirical evidence that abused wives face increased HIV risk based both on the greater likelihood of HIV infection among abusive husbands and elevated HIV transmission within abusive relationships. Thus, IPV seems to function both as a risk marker and as a risk factor for HIV among women, indicating the need for interwoven efforts to prevent both men's sexual risk and IPV perpetration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-600
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spouses
HIV Infections
HIV
Intimate Partner Violence
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Marriage
Logistic Models
Family Health
Health Surveys

Keywords

  • HIV
  • India
  • Partner violence
  • Sexual risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection : Findings from indian husband-wife dyads. / Decker, Michele R; Seage, George R.; Hemenway, David; Raj, Anita; Saggurti, Niranjan; Balaiah, Donta; Silverman, Jay G.

In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 51, No. 5, 08.2009, p. 593-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Decker, Michele R ; Seage, George R. ; Hemenway, David ; Raj, Anita ; Saggurti, Niranjan ; Balaiah, Donta ; Silverman, Jay G. / Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection : Findings from indian husband-wife dyads. In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2009 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 593-600.
@article{f3e3fafe1ad44130a6987a5f7b9e4029,
title = "Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection: Findings from indian husband-wife dyads",
abstract = "CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:: Female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) consistently demonstrate elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV prevalence. IPV is thought to function indirectly as a marker of abusive men's elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV infection and/or directly via facilitating transmission to wives. The present examination utilizes a nationally representative sample of married Indian couples to test these mechanisms and determine whether (1) abusive husbands demonstrate higher HIV infection prevalence compared with nonabusive husbands and (2) the risk of wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection varies as a function of their exposure to IPV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:: The Indian National Family Health Survey-3 was conducted across all Indian states in 2005-2006. Analyses were limited to 20,425 husband-wife dyads, which provided both IPV data and HIV test results. ANALYSES:: Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios and 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the following associations: (1) husbands' HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship based on their perpetration of IPV and (2) wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection, as a function of their IPV exposure. RESULTS:: One third (37.4{\%}) of wives experienced IPV; 0.4{\%} of husbands and 0.2{\%} of wives were HIV infected. Compared with nonabusive husbands, abusive husbands demonstrated increased odds of HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95{\%} CI 1.11 to 3.27). Husbands' HIV infection was associated with increased HIV risk among wives; this risk was elevated 7-fold in abusive relationships in adjusted models (AOR = 7.22; 95{\%} CI 1.05 to 49.88). CONCLUSIONS:: Findings provide the first empirical evidence that abused wives face increased HIV risk based both on the greater likelihood of HIV infection among abusive husbands and elevated HIV transmission within abusive relationships. Thus, IPV seems to function both as a risk marker and as a risk factor for HIV among women, indicating the need for interwoven efforts to prevent both men's sexual risk and IPV perpetration.",
keywords = "HIV, India, Partner violence, Sexual risk",
author = "Decker, {Michele R} and Seage, {George R.} and David Hemenway and Anita Raj and Niranjan Saggurti and Donta Balaiah and Silverman, {Jay G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a255d6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "593--600",
journal = "Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes",
issn = "1525-4135",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection

T2 - Findings from indian husband-wife dyads

AU - Decker, Michele R

AU - Seage, George R.

AU - Hemenway, David

AU - Raj, Anita

AU - Saggurti, Niranjan

AU - Balaiah, Donta

AU - Silverman, Jay G.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:: Female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) consistently demonstrate elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV prevalence. IPV is thought to function indirectly as a marker of abusive men's elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV infection and/or directly via facilitating transmission to wives. The present examination utilizes a nationally representative sample of married Indian couples to test these mechanisms and determine whether (1) abusive husbands demonstrate higher HIV infection prevalence compared with nonabusive husbands and (2) the risk of wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection varies as a function of their exposure to IPV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:: The Indian National Family Health Survey-3 was conducted across all Indian states in 2005-2006. Analyses were limited to 20,425 husband-wife dyads, which provided both IPV data and HIV test results. ANALYSES:: Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the following associations: (1) husbands' HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship based on their perpetration of IPV and (2) wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection, as a function of their IPV exposure. RESULTS:: One third (37.4%) of wives experienced IPV; 0.4% of husbands and 0.2% of wives were HIV infected. Compared with nonabusive husbands, abusive husbands demonstrated increased odds of HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95% CI 1.11 to 3.27). Husbands' HIV infection was associated with increased HIV risk among wives; this risk was elevated 7-fold in abusive relationships in adjusted models (AOR = 7.22; 95% CI 1.05 to 49.88). CONCLUSIONS:: Findings provide the first empirical evidence that abused wives face increased HIV risk based both on the greater likelihood of HIV infection among abusive husbands and elevated HIV transmission within abusive relationships. Thus, IPV seems to function both as a risk marker and as a risk factor for HIV among women, indicating the need for interwoven efforts to prevent both men's sexual risk and IPV perpetration.

AB - CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:: Female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) consistently demonstrate elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV prevalence. IPV is thought to function indirectly as a marker of abusive men's elevated sexually transmitted infection/HIV infection and/or directly via facilitating transmission to wives. The present examination utilizes a nationally representative sample of married Indian couples to test these mechanisms and determine whether (1) abusive husbands demonstrate higher HIV infection prevalence compared with nonabusive husbands and (2) the risk of wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection varies as a function of their exposure to IPV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:: The Indian National Family Health Survey-3 was conducted across all Indian states in 2005-2006. Analyses were limited to 20,425 husband-wife dyads, which provided both IPV data and HIV test results. ANALYSES:: Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the following associations: (1) husbands' HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship based on their perpetration of IPV and (2) wives' HIV infection based on husbands' HIV infection, as a function of their IPV exposure. RESULTS:: One third (37.4%) of wives experienced IPV; 0.4% of husbands and 0.2% of wives were HIV infected. Compared with nonabusive husbands, abusive husbands demonstrated increased odds of HIV acquisition outside the marital relationship in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95% CI 1.11 to 3.27). Husbands' HIV infection was associated with increased HIV risk among wives; this risk was elevated 7-fold in abusive relationships in adjusted models (AOR = 7.22; 95% CI 1.05 to 49.88). CONCLUSIONS:: Findings provide the first empirical evidence that abused wives face increased HIV risk based both on the greater likelihood of HIV infection among abusive husbands and elevated HIV transmission within abusive relationships. Thus, IPV seems to function both as a risk marker and as a risk factor for HIV among women, indicating the need for interwoven efforts to prevent both men's sexual risk and IPV perpetration.

KW - HIV

KW - India

KW - Partner violence

KW - Sexual risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68449090641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68449090641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a255d6

DO - 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a255d6

M3 - Article

C2 - 19421070

AN - SCOPUS:68449090641

VL - 51

SP - 593

EP - 600

JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

SN - 1525-4135

IS - 5

ER -