Intimate partner violence: Development of a brief risk assessment for the emergency department

Carolyn Snider, Daniel W Webster, Chris S. O'Sullivan, Jacquelyn C Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Women assaulted by intimate partners are frequently patients in emergency departments (EDs). Many victims and health care providers fail to take into account the potential risks of repeat partner violence. The objective of this study was to use data from a larger study of domestic violence risk assessment methods to develop a brief assessment for acute care settings to identify victims at highest risk for suffering severe injury or potentially lethal assault by an intimate partner or former partner. Methods: Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) were interviewed twice between 2002 and 2004. The baseline interview included the 20 items of Campbell's Danger Assessment (DA; predictor). The followup interview, conducted 9 months later on average, assessed abuse inflicted since the baseline interview (outcome). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify questions on the DA most predictive of severe abuse and potentially lethal assaults. Female IPV victims were recruited from New York City family courts, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 9-1-1 calls, New York City and Los Angeles shelters, and New York City hospitals; 666 women responded to the DA at baseline, and 60% participated in follow-up interviews. Results: Severe injuries or potentially lethal assaults were experience by 14.9% of retained study participants between the baseline and follow-up interviews. The best brief prediction instrument has five questions. A positive answer to any three questions has a sensitivity of 83%(95%confidence interval = 70.6%to 91.4%). Conclusions: This instrument can help predict which victims may be at increased risk for severe injury or potentially lethal assault and can aid clinicians in differentiating which patients require comprehensive safety interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1208-1216
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Interviews
Los Angeles
Wounds and Injuries
Domestic Violence
Urban Hospitals
Violence
Health Personnel
Logistic Models
Intimate Partner Violence
Confidence Intervals
Safety

Keywords

  • Injury
  • Intervention
  • Intimate partner violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Intimate partner violence : Development of a brief risk assessment for the emergency department. / Snider, Carolyn; Webster, Daniel W; O'Sullivan, Chris S.; Campbell, Jacquelyn C.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 11, 11.2009, p. 1208-1216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b371258d65740f1b3ddf2dbd6e7e2b5,
title = "Intimate partner violence: Development of a brief risk assessment for the emergency department",
abstract = "Objectives: Women assaulted by intimate partners are frequently patients in emergency departments (EDs). Many victims and health care providers fail to take into account the potential risks of repeat partner violence. The objective of this study was to use data from a larger study of domestic violence risk assessment methods to develop a brief assessment for acute care settings to identify victims at highest risk for suffering severe injury or potentially lethal assault by an intimate partner or former partner. Methods: Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) were interviewed twice between 2002 and 2004. The baseline interview included the 20 items of Campbell's Danger Assessment (DA; predictor). The followup interview, conducted 9 months later on average, assessed abuse inflicted since the baseline interview (outcome). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify questions on the DA most predictive of severe abuse and potentially lethal assaults. Female IPV victims were recruited from New York City family courts, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 9-1-1 calls, New York City and Los Angeles shelters, and New York City hospitals; 666 women responded to the DA at baseline, and 60{\%} participated in follow-up interviews. Results: Severe injuries or potentially lethal assaults were experience by 14.9{\%} of retained study participants between the baseline and follow-up interviews. The best brief prediction instrument has five questions. A positive answer to any three questions has a sensitivity of 83{\%}(95{\%}confidence interval = 70.6{\%}to 91.4{\%}). Conclusions: This instrument can help predict which victims may be at increased risk for severe injury or potentially lethal assault and can aid clinicians in differentiating which patients require comprehensive safety interventions.",
keywords = "Injury, Intervention, Intimate partner violence",
author = "Carolyn Snider and Webster, {Daniel W} and O'Sullivan, {Chris S.} and Campbell, {Jacquelyn C}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00457.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1208--1216",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimate partner violence

T2 - Development of a brief risk assessment for the emergency department

AU - Snider, Carolyn

AU - Webster, Daniel W

AU - O'Sullivan, Chris S.

AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn C

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Objectives: Women assaulted by intimate partners are frequently patients in emergency departments (EDs). Many victims and health care providers fail to take into account the potential risks of repeat partner violence. The objective of this study was to use data from a larger study of domestic violence risk assessment methods to develop a brief assessment for acute care settings to identify victims at highest risk for suffering severe injury or potentially lethal assault by an intimate partner or former partner. Methods: Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) were interviewed twice between 2002 and 2004. The baseline interview included the 20 items of Campbell's Danger Assessment (DA; predictor). The followup interview, conducted 9 months later on average, assessed abuse inflicted since the baseline interview (outcome). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify questions on the DA most predictive of severe abuse and potentially lethal assaults. Female IPV victims were recruited from New York City family courts, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 9-1-1 calls, New York City and Los Angeles shelters, and New York City hospitals; 666 women responded to the DA at baseline, and 60% participated in follow-up interviews. Results: Severe injuries or potentially lethal assaults were experience by 14.9% of retained study participants between the baseline and follow-up interviews. The best brief prediction instrument has five questions. A positive answer to any three questions has a sensitivity of 83%(95%confidence interval = 70.6%to 91.4%). Conclusions: This instrument can help predict which victims may be at increased risk for severe injury or potentially lethal assault and can aid clinicians in differentiating which patients require comprehensive safety interventions.

AB - Objectives: Women assaulted by intimate partners are frequently patients in emergency departments (EDs). Many victims and health care providers fail to take into account the potential risks of repeat partner violence. The objective of this study was to use data from a larger study of domestic violence risk assessment methods to develop a brief assessment for acute care settings to identify victims at highest risk for suffering severe injury or potentially lethal assault by an intimate partner or former partner. Methods: Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) were interviewed twice between 2002 and 2004. The baseline interview included the 20 items of Campbell's Danger Assessment (DA; predictor). The followup interview, conducted 9 months later on average, assessed abuse inflicted since the baseline interview (outcome). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify questions on the DA most predictive of severe abuse and potentially lethal assaults. Female IPV victims were recruited from New York City family courts, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 9-1-1 calls, New York City and Los Angeles shelters, and New York City hospitals; 666 women responded to the DA at baseline, and 60% participated in follow-up interviews. Results: Severe injuries or potentially lethal assaults were experience by 14.9% of retained study participants between the baseline and follow-up interviews. The best brief prediction instrument has five questions. A positive answer to any three questions has a sensitivity of 83%(95%confidence interval = 70.6%to 91.4%). Conclusions: This instrument can help predict which victims may be at increased risk for severe injury or potentially lethal assault and can aid clinicians in differentiating which patients require comprehensive safety interventions.

KW - Injury

KW - Intervention

KW - Intimate partner violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73249131574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73249131574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00457.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00457.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20053241

AN - SCOPUS:73249131574

VL - 16

SP - 1208

EP - 1216

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -