Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study

Jennifer A. Wagman, Blake Charvat, Marie E. Thoma, Anthony Ndyanabo, Fred Nalugoda, Joseph Ssekasanvu, Grace Kigozi, David Serwadda, Joseph Kagaayi, Maria J Wawer, Ronald H Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and union disruption (divorce or separation) in the rural Ugandan setting of Rakai District. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data collected from April 1999 to June 2006, from 6834 women (15–49 years) living in 50 communities in Rakai. Participants were either officially married, traditionally married or in a consensual union during one or more surveys and completed at least one follow-up survey. The primary outcome was union disruption through divorce or separation from the primary sexual partner. Results: Past year IPV ranged from 6.49 % (severe physical abuse) to 31.99 % (emotional abuse). Severe physical IPV was significantly associated with divorce/separation, after adjusting for other covariates (aOR = 1.80, 95 % CI 1.01–3.22). Another predictor of union disruption was a woman having two or more sexual partners in the past year (aOR = 8.42, 95 % CI 5.97–11.89). Factors protecting against divorce/separation included an increasing number of co-resident biological children and longer duration of union. Conclusions: IPV, particularly severe physical abuse, is an important risk factor for union disruption. Marital counseling, health education and interventions should address the role of IPV on the wellbeing of women and the stability of couples in Uganda.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Public Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 13 2016

Fingerprint

Uganda
Divorce
Longitudinal Studies
longitudinal study
divorce
violence
abuse
Sexual Partners
Marriage
Health Education
health promotion
Counseling
counseling
Intimate Partner Violence
district
resident
community
Physical Abuse

Keywords

  • Divorce
  • Global health
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Longitudinal analysis
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Union dissolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda : a longitudinal study. / Wagman, Jennifer A.; Charvat, Blake; Thoma, Marie E.; Ndyanabo, Anthony; Nalugoda, Fred; Ssekasanvu, Joseph; Kigozi, Grace; Serwadda, David; Kagaayi, Joseph; Wawer, Maria J; Gray, Ronald H.

In: International Journal of Public Health, 13.09.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wagman, Jennifer A. ; Charvat, Blake ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Ndyanabo, Anthony ; Nalugoda, Fred ; Ssekasanvu, Joseph ; Kigozi, Grace ; Serwadda, David ; Kagaayi, Joseph ; Wawer, Maria J ; Gray, Ronald H. / Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda : a longitudinal study. In: International Journal of Public Health. 2016 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{49e9581e9ccc40d6b1d9275c9d38a753,
title = "Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study",
abstract = "Objectives: We assessed the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and union disruption (divorce or separation) in the rural Ugandan setting of Rakai District. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data collected from April 1999 to June 2006, from 6834 women (15–49 years) living in 50 communities in Rakai. Participants were either officially married, traditionally married or in a consensual union during one or more surveys and completed at least one follow-up survey. The primary outcome was union disruption through divorce or separation from the primary sexual partner. Results: Past year IPV ranged from 6.49 {\%} (severe physical abuse) to 31.99 {\%} (emotional abuse). Severe physical IPV was significantly associated with divorce/separation, after adjusting for other covariates (aOR = 1.80, 95 {\%} CI 1.01–3.22). Another predictor of union disruption was a woman having two or more sexual partners in the past year (aOR = 8.42, 95 {\%} CI 5.97–11.89). Factors protecting against divorce/separation included an increasing number of co-resident biological children and longer duration of union. Conclusions: IPV, particularly severe physical abuse, is an important risk factor for union disruption. Marital counseling, health education and interventions should address the role of IPV on the wellbeing of women and the stability of couples in Uganda.",
keywords = "Divorce, Global health, Intimate partner violence, Longitudinal analysis, Sub-Saharan Africa, Union dissolution",
author = "Wagman, {Jennifer A.} and Blake Charvat and Thoma, {Marie E.} and Anthony Ndyanabo and Fred Nalugoda and Joseph Ssekasanvu and Grace Kigozi and David Serwadda and Joseph Kagaayi and Wawer, {Maria J} and Gray, {Ronald H}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s00038-016-0891-z",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "International Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1661-8556",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda

T2 - a longitudinal study

AU - Wagman, Jennifer A.

AU - Charvat, Blake

AU - Thoma, Marie E.

AU - Ndyanabo, Anthony

AU - Nalugoda, Fred

AU - Ssekasanvu, Joseph

AU - Kigozi, Grace

AU - Serwadda, David

AU - Kagaayi, Joseph

AU - Wawer, Maria J

AU - Gray, Ronald H

PY - 2016/9/13

Y1 - 2016/9/13

N2 - Objectives: We assessed the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and union disruption (divorce or separation) in the rural Ugandan setting of Rakai District. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data collected from April 1999 to June 2006, from 6834 women (15–49 years) living in 50 communities in Rakai. Participants were either officially married, traditionally married or in a consensual union during one or more surveys and completed at least one follow-up survey. The primary outcome was union disruption through divorce or separation from the primary sexual partner. Results: Past year IPV ranged from 6.49 % (severe physical abuse) to 31.99 % (emotional abuse). Severe physical IPV was significantly associated with divorce/separation, after adjusting for other covariates (aOR = 1.80, 95 % CI 1.01–3.22). Another predictor of union disruption was a woman having two or more sexual partners in the past year (aOR = 8.42, 95 % CI 5.97–11.89). Factors protecting against divorce/separation included an increasing number of co-resident biological children and longer duration of union. Conclusions: IPV, particularly severe physical abuse, is an important risk factor for union disruption. Marital counseling, health education and interventions should address the role of IPV on the wellbeing of women and the stability of couples in Uganda.

AB - Objectives: We assessed the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and union disruption (divorce or separation) in the rural Ugandan setting of Rakai District. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data collected from April 1999 to June 2006, from 6834 women (15–49 years) living in 50 communities in Rakai. Participants were either officially married, traditionally married or in a consensual union during one or more surveys and completed at least one follow-up survey. The primary outcome was union disruption through divorce or separation from the primary sexual partner. Results: Past year IPV ranged from 6.49 % (severe physical abuse) to 31.99 % (emotional abuse). Severe physical IPV was significantly associated with divorce/separation, after adjusting for other covariates (aOR = 1.80, 95 % CI 1.01–3.22). Another predictor of union disruption was a woman having two or more sexual partners in the past year (aOR = 8.42, 95 % CI 5.97–11.89). Factors protecting against divorce/separation included an increasing number of co-resident biological children and longer duration of union. Conclusions: IPV, particularly severe physical abuse, is an important risk factor for union disruption. Marital counseling, health education and interventions should address the role of IPV on the wellbeing of women and the stability of couples in Uganda.

KW - Divorce

KW - Global health

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Longitudinal analysis

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Union dissolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987597516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987597516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00038-016-0891-z

DO - 10.1007/s00038-016-0891-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 27624624

AN - SCOPUS:84987597516

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - International Journal of Public Health

JF - International Journal of Public Health

SN - 1661-8556

ER -