Intervening or interfering? The influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on intervention behaviours in alcohol consumption contexts

Saar Mollen, Rajiv N. Rimal, Robert A.C. Ruiter, Su Ahn Jang, Gerjo Kok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In situations when people have been drinking, they often find it difficult to tell their friends to stop drinking, or not to drive home. Most people want to avoid being seen as a busybody, which may inhibit advice giving. In the current study, we investigated how positive and negative descriptive and injunctive norms (in alcohol consumption contexts) affect people's motivation to engage in intervening (e.g. ask a friend to stop drinking) and non-intervening (e.g. let friends make their own drinking decisions) behaviours. An online experiment with a four weeks post-test was conducted. Results showed that positive social norms resulted in a higher motivation to engage in intervening behaviour and a lower motivation to engage in non-intervening behaviour, compared to negative social norms. Injunctive, but not descriptive, norms had an effect on intervening behaviour four weeks after the manipulations. In line with prior findings, we also found that injunctive norms, in comparison to descriptive norms, are less amenable to change but that their influence is more enduring. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-578
Number of pages18
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Keywords

  • alcohol
  • descriptive norm
  • injunctive norm
  • intervening
  • protective behaviour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intervening or interfering? The influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on intervention behaviours in alcohol consumption contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this