Interrater agreement between nurses for the pediatric canadian triage and acuity scale in a tertiary care center

Jocelyn Gravel, Serge Gouin, Sergio Manzano, Michael Arsenault, Devendra Amre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to measure the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage levels to children visiting a pediatric emergency departments (EDs) assisted by a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study evaluating children triaged from Level 2 (emergent) to Level 5 (nonurgent). A convenience sample of patients triaged during 38 shifts from April to September 2007 in a tertiary care pediatric ED was evaluated. All patients were initially triaged by regular triage nurses using a computerized version of the PedCTAS. Research nurses performed a second evaluation blinded to the first evaluation using the same triage tool. These research nurses were regular ED nurses performing extra hours for research purposes exclusively. The primary outcome measure was the interrater agreement between the two nurses as measured by the linear weighted kappa score. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patient for which nurses did not apply the triage level suggested by Staturg (override) and agreement for these overrides. Results: A total of 499 patients were recruited. The overall interrater agreement was moderate (linear weighted kappa score of 0.55 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.48 to 0.61] and quadratic weighted kappa score of 0.61 [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.80]). There was a discrepancy of more than one level in only 10 patients (2% of the study population). Overrides occurred in 23.2 and 21.8% for regular and research triage nurses, respectively. These overrides were equally distributed between increase and decrease in triage level. Conclusions: Nurses using Staturg, which is a computerized version of the PedCTAS, demonstrated moderate interrater agreement for assignment of triage level to children presenting to a pediatric ED.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1262-1267
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Triage
Tertiary Care Centers
Nurses
Pediatrics
Hospital Emergency Service
Research
Pediatric Nurses
Confidence Intervals
Tertiary Healthcare
Cohort Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Children
  • Emergency department
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Interrater agreement between nurses for the pediatric canadian triage and acuity scale in a tertiary care center. / Gravel, Jocelyn; Gouin, Serge; Manzano, Sergio; Arsenault, Michael; Amre, Devendra.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 1262-1267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gravel, Jocelyn ; Gouin, Serge ; Manzano, Sergio ; Arsenault, Michael ; Amre, Devendra. / Interrater agreement between nurses for the pediatric canadian triage and acuity scale in a tertiary care center. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 12. pp. 1262-1267.
@article{773b45d9dd594f47b52f343cbfd8ad10,
title = "Interrater agreement between nurses for the pediatric canadian triage and acuity scale in a tertiary care center",
abstract = "Objectives: The objective was to measure the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage levels to children visiting a pediatric emergency departments (EDs) assisted by a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study evaluating children triaged from Level 2 (emergent) to Level 5 (nonurgent). A convenience sample of patients triaged during 38 shifts from April to September 2007 in a tertiary care pediatric ED was evaluated. All patients were initially triaged by regular triage nurses using a computerized version of the PedCTAS. Research nurses performed a second evaluation blinded to the first evaluation using the same triage tool. These research nurses were regular ED nurses performing extra hours for research purposes exclusively. The primary outcome measure was the interrater agreement between the two nurses as measured by the linear weighted kappa score. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patient for which nurses did not apply the triage level suggested by Staturg (override) and agreement for these overrides. Results: A total of 499 patients were recruited. The overall interrater agreement was moderate (linear weighted kappa score of 0.55 [95{\%} confidence interval {CI} = 0.48 to 0.61] and quadratic weighted kappa score of 0.61 [95{\%} CI = 0.42 to 0.80]). There was a discrepancy of more than one level in only 10 patients (2{\%} of the study population). Overrides occurred in 23.2 and 21.8{\%} for regular and research triage nurses, respectively. These overrides were equally distributed between increase and decrease in triage level. Conclusions: Nurses using Staturg, which is a computerized version of the PedCTAS, demonstrated moderate interrater agreement for assignment of triage level to children presenting to a pediatric ED.",
keywords = "Children, Emergency department, Triage",
author = "Jocelyn Gravel and Serge Gouin and Sergio Manzano and Michael Arsenault and Devendra Amre",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1262--1267",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater agreement between nurses for the pediatric canadian triage and acuity scale in a tertiary care center

AU - Gravel, Jocelyn

AU - Gouin, Serge

AU - Manzano, Sergio

AU - Arsenault, Michael

AU - Amre, Devendra

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objectives: The objective was to measure the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage levels to children visiting a pediatric emergency departments (EDs) assisted by a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study evaluating children triaged from Level 2 (emergent) to Level 5 (nonurgent). A convenience sample of patients triaged during 38 shifts from April to September 2007 in a tertiary care pediatric ED was evaluated. All patients were initially triaged by regular triage nurses using a computerized version of the PedCTAS. Research nurses performed a second evaluation blinded to the first evaluation using the same triage tool. These research nurses were regular ED nurses performing extra hours for research purposes exclusively. The primary outcome measure was the interrater agreement between the two nurses as measured by the linear weighted kappa score. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patient for which nurses did not apply the triage level suggested by Staturg (override) and agreement for these overrides. Results: A total of 499 patients were recruited. The overall interrater agreement was moderate (linear weighted kappa score of 0.55 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.48 to 0.61] and quadratic weighted kappa score of 0.61 [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.80]). There was a discrepancy of more than one level in only 10 patients (2% of the study population). Overrides occurred in 23.2 and 21.8% for regular and research triage nurses, respectively. These overrides were equally distributed between increase and decrease in triage level. Conclusions: Nurses using Staturg, which is a computerized version of the PedCTAS, demonstrated moderate interrater agreement for assignment of triage level to children presenting to a pediatric ED.

AB - Objectives: The objective was to measure the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage levels to children visiting a pediatric emergency departments (EDs) assisted by a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study evaluating children triaged from Level 2 (emergent) to Level 5 (nonurgent). A convenience sample of patients triaged during 38 shifts from April to September 2007 in a tertiary care pediatric ED was evaluated. All patients were initially triaged by regular triage nurses using a computerized version of the PedCTAS. Research nurses performed a second evaluation blinded to the first evaluation using the same triage tool. These research nurses were regular ED nurses performing extra hours for research purposes exclusively. The primary outcome measure was the interrater agreement between the two nurses as measured by the linear weighted kappa score. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patient for which nurses did not apply the triage level suggested by Staturg (override) and agreement for these overrides. Results: A total of 499 patients were recruited. The overall interrater agreement was moderate (linear weighted kappa score of 0.55 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.48 to 0.61] and quadratic weighted kappa score of 0.61 [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.80]). There was a discrepancy of more than one level in only 10 patients (2% of the study population). Overrides occurred in 23.2 and 21.8% for regular and research triage nurses, respectively. These overrides were equally distributed between increase and decrease in triage level. Conclusions: Nurses using Staturg, which is a computerized version of the PedCTAS, demonstrated moderate interrater agreement for assignment of triage level to children presenting to a pediatric ED.

KW - Children

KW - Emergency department

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349173080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349173080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18945238

AN - SCOPUS:57349173080

VL - 15

SP - 1262

EP - 1267

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -