Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it: Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies

Elise Paradis, Myles Leslie, Michael A. Gropper, Hanan Aboumatar, Simon Kitto, Scott Reeves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

At the heart of safe cultures are effective interactions within and between interprofessional teams. Critical care clinicians see severely ill patients who require coordinated interprofessional care. In this scoping review, we asked: "What do we know about processes, relationships, organizational and contextual factors that shape the ability of clinicians to deliver interprofessional care in adult ICUs?" Using the 5-stage process established by Levac et al. (2010), we reviewed 981 abstracts to identify ethnographic articles that shed light on interprofessional care in the intensive care unit. The quality of selected articles is assessed using best practices in ethnographic research; their main insights evaluated in light of an interprofessional framework developed by Reeves et al ( Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. San Francisco, CA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010). Overall, studies were of mixed quality, with an average (SD) score of 5.8 out of 10 (1.77). Insights into intensive care unit cultures include the importance of paying attention to workflow, the nefarious impact of hierarchical relationships, the mixed responses to protocols imposed from the top down, and a general undertheorization of sex and race. This review highlights several lessons for safe cultures and argues that more needs to be known about the context of critical care if quality and safety interventions are to succeed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1062-1067
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
San Francisco
Workflow
Practice Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Research

Keywords

  • Acute care
  • Ethnographic research
  • Interprofessional relations
  • Literature review
  • Patient safety
  • Quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it : Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies. / Paradis, Elise; Leslie, Myles; Gropper, Michael A.; Aboumatar, Hanan; Kitto, Simon; Reeves, Scott.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 28, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1062-1067.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paradis, Elise ; Leslie, Myles ; Gropper, Michael A. ; Aboumatar, Hanan ; Kitto, Simon ; Reeves, Scott. / Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it : Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 1062-1067.
@article{bc885450c8714adfa30123eff82f3e6e,
title = "Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it: Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies",
abstract = "At the heart of safe cultures are effective interactions within and between interprofessional teams. Critical care clinicians see severely ill patients who require coordinated interprofessional care. In this scoping review, we asked: {"}What do we know about processes, relationships, organizational and contextual factors that shape the ability of clinicians to deliver interprofessional care in adult ICUs?{"} Using the 5-stage process established by Levac et al. (2010), we reviewed 981 abstracts to identify ethnographic articles that shed light on interprofessional care in the intensive care unit. The quality of selected articles is assessed using best practices in ethnographic research; their main insights evaluated in light of an interprofessional framework developed by Reeves et al ( Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. San Francisco, CA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010). Overall, studies were of mixed quality, with an average (SD) score of 5.8 out of 10 (1.77). Insights into intensive care unit cultures include the importance of paying attention to workflow, the nefarious impact of hierarchical relationships, the mixed responses to protocols imposed from the top down, and a general undertheorization of sex and race. This review highlights several lessons for safe cultures and argues that more needs to be known about the context of critical care if quality and safety interventions are to succeed.",
keywords = "Acute care, Ethnographic research, Interprofessional relations, Literature review, Patient safety, Quality of health care",
author = "Elise Paradis and Myles Leslie and Gropper, {Michael A.} and Hanan Aboumatar and Simon Kitto and Scott Reeves",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1062--1067",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it

T2 - Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies

AU - Paradis, Elise

AU - Leslie, Myles

AU - Gropper, Michael A.

AU - Aboumatar, Hanan

AU - Kitto, Simon

AU - Reeves, Scott

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - At the heart of safe cultures are effective interactions within and between interprofessional teams. Critical care clinicians see severely ill patients who require coordinated interprofessional care. In this scoping review, we asked: "What do we know about processes, relationships, organizational and contextual factors that shape the ability of clinicians to deliver interprofessional care in adult ICUs?" Using the 5-stage process established by Levac et al. (2010), we reviewed 981 abstracts to identify ethnographic articles that shed light on interprofessional care in the intensive care unit. The quality of selected articles is assessed using best practices in ethnographic research; their main insights evaluated in light of an interprofessional framework developed by Reeves et al ( Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. San Francisco, CA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010). Overall, studies were of mixed quality, with an average (SD) score of 5.8 out of 10 (1.77). Insights into intensive care unit cultures include the importance of paying attention to workflow, the nefarious impact of hierarchical relationships, the mixed responses to protocols imposed from the top down, and a general undertheorization of sex and race. This review highlights several lessons for safe cultures and argues that more needs to be known about the context of critical care if quality and safety interventions are to succeed.

AB - At the heart of safe cultures are effective interactions within and between interprofessional teams. Critical care clinicians see severely ill patients who require coordinated interprofessional care. In this scoping review, we asked: "What do we know about processes, relationships, organizational and contextual factors that shape the ability of clinicians to deliver interprofessional care in adult ICUs?" Using the 5-stage process established by Levac et al. (2010), we reviewed 981 abstracts to identify ethnographic articles that shed light on interprofessional care in the intensive care unit. The quality of selected articles is assessed using best practices in ethnographic research; their main insights evaluated in light of an interprofessional framework developed by Reeves et al ( Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. San Francisco, CA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010). Overall, studies were of mixed quality, with an average (SD) score of 5.8 out of 10 (1.77). Insights into intensive care unit cultures include the importance of paying attention to workflow, the nefarious impact of hierarchical relationships, the mixed responses to protocols imposed from the top down, and a general undertheorization of sex and race. This review highlights several lessons for safe cultures and argues that more needs to be known about the context of critical care if quality and safety interventions are to succeed.

KW - Acute care

KW - Ethnographic research

KW - Interprofessional relations

KW - Literature review

KW - Patient safety

KW - Quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887404326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887404326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 23890936

AN - SCOPUS:84887404326

VL - 28

SP - 1062

EP - 1067

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 6

ER -