Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse

Edward J. Cone, Marilyn A. Huestis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse offers significant advantages over urine as a test matrix. Collection can be performed under direct observation with reduced risk of adulteration and substitution. Drugs generally appear in oral fluid by passive diffusion from blood, but also may be deposited in the oral cavity during oral, smoked, and intranasal administration. Drug metabolites also can be detected in oral fluid. Unlike urine testing, there may be a close correspondence between drug and metabolite concentrations in oral fluid and in blood. Interpretation of oral fluid results for drugs of abuse should be an iterative process whereby one considers the test results in the context of program requirements and a broad scientific knowledge of the many factors involved in determining test outcome. This review delineates many of the chemical and metabolic processes involved in the disposition of drugs and metabolites in oral fluid that are important to the appropriate interpretation of oral fluid tests. Chemical, metabolic, kinetic, and analytic parameters are summarized for selected drugs of abuse, and general guidelines are offered for understanding the significance of oral fluid tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOral-based Diagnostics
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.
Pages51-103
Number of pages53
ISBN (Print)157331661X, 9781573316613
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Publication series

NameAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1098
ISSN (Print)0077-8923
ISSN (Electronic)1749-6632

Keywords

  • Advantages
  • Interpretation
  • Limitations
  • Oral fluid
  • Saliva
  • Testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this