Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer

W. Richard Webb, Michele Sarin, Elias Zerhouni, Robert T. Heelan, Gary M. Glazer, Constantine Gatsonis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to assess the interobserver variability in Staging non-small cell lung cancer using CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: As part of the Radiologie Diagnostic Oncology Group (RDOG) study of lung cancer Staging, the CT and MR examinations of 40 patients suspected of having non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma were blindly interpreted by four expert observers. The primary tumor and lymph node stages in the 40 study subjects were similar to the final proportions reported in the RDOG study. Assessed abnormalities included the presence of a lung nodule, ehest wall invasion, mediastinal invasion, bronchial involvement, lymph node metastasis in specific node stations, and T and N classifications. Percent agreement and K-values were calculated for each of these determinations. Results: Depending on the finding assessed and the method of analysis, average agreement rates ranged from 58 to 90% for CT and from 61 to 96% for MRI. Average K-values were largely between 0.40 and 0.60 when dichotomous analysis was used; weighted K-values were similar. With a single exception, no significant differences were found for K-values calculated for CT and MRI. Conclusion: Although interobserver agreement rates are good for determining T and N Classification in patients with lung cancer, variability in image interpretation is frequent, even among experienced observers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)841-846
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume17
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Lung Neoplasms
Lymph Nodes
Bronchogenic Carcinoma
Neoplasm Staging
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Neoplasm Metastasis
Lung
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Comparative studies
  • Comparative studies
  • Computed tomography
  • Lungs
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Webb, W. R., Sarin, M., Zerhouni, E., Heelan, R. T., Glazer, G. M., & Gatsonis, C. (1993). Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 17(6), 841-846.

Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer. / Webb, W. Richard; Sarin, Michele; Zerhouni, Elias; Heelan, Robert T.; Glazer, Gary M.; Gatsonis, Constantine.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1993, p. 841-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webb, WR, Sarin, M, Zerhouni, E, Heelan, RT, Glazer, GM & Gatsonis, C 1993, 'Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer', Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 841-846.
Webb WR, Sarin M, Zerhouni E, Heelan RT, Glazer GM, Gatsonis C. Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1993;17(6):841-846.
Webb, W. Richard ; Sarin, Michele ; Zerhouni, Elias ; Heelan, Robert T. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Gatsonis, Constantine. / Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer. In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1993 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 841-846.
@article{d3fd7fccaae04cf7a4129a6f0c1af104,
title = "Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer",
abstract = "Objective: Our goal was to assess the interobserver variability in Staging non-small cell lung cancer using CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: As part of the Radiologie Diagnostic Oncology Group (RDOG) study of lung cancer Staging, the CT and MR examinations of 40 patients suspected of having non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma were blindly interpreted by four expert observers. The primary tumor and lymph node stages in the 40 study subjects were similar to the final proportions reported in the RDOG study. Assessed abnormalities included the presence of a lung nodule, ehest wall invasion, mediastinal invasion, bronchial involvement, lymph node metastasis in specific node stations, and T and N classifications. Percent agreement and K-values were calculated for each of these determinations. Results: Depending on the finding assessed and the method of analysis, average agreement rates ranged from 58 to 90{\%} for CT and from 61 to 96{\%} for MRI. Average K-values were largely between 0.40 and 0.60 when dichotomous analysis was used; weighted K-values were similar. With a single exception, no significant differences were found for K-values calculated for CT and MRI. Conclusion: Although interobserver agreement rates are good for determining T and N Classification in patients with lung cancer, variability in image interpretation is frequent, even among experienced observers.",
keywords = "Cancer, Comparative studies, Comparative studies, Computed tomography, Lungs, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neoplasms, Staging",
author = "Webb, {W. Richard} and Michele Sarin and Elias Zerhouni and Heelan, {Robert T.} and Glazer, {Gary M.} and Constantine Gatsonis",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "841--846",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver variability in ct and mr staging of lung cancer

AU - Webb, W. Richard

AU - Sarin, Michele

AU - Zerhouni, Elias

AU - Heelan, Robert T.

AU - Glazer, Gary M.

AU - Gatsonis, Constantine

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Objective: Our goal was to assess the interobserver variability in Staging non-small cell lung cancer using CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: As part of the Radiologie Diagnostic Oncology Group (RDOG) study of lung cancer Staging, the CT and MR examinations of 40 patients suspected of having non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma were blindly interpreted by four expert observers. The primary tumor and lymph node stages in the 40 study subjects were similar to the final proportions reported in the RDOG study. Assessed abnormalities included the presence of a lung nodule, ehest wall invasion, mediastinal invasion, bronchial involvement, lymph node metastasis in specific node stations, and T and N classifications. Percent agreement and K-values were calculated for each of these determinations. Results: Depending on the finding assessed and the method of analysis, average agreement rates ranged from 58 to 90% for CT and from 61 to 96% for MRI. Average K-values were largely between 0.40 and 0.60 when dichotomous analysis was used; weighted K-values were similar. With a single exception, no significant differences were found for K-values calculated for CT and MRI. Conclusion: Although interobserver agreement rates are good for determining T and N Classification in patients with lung cancer, variability in image interpretation is frequent, even among experienced observers.

AB - Objective: Our goal was to assess the interobserver variability in Staging non-small cell lung cancer using CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: As part of the Radiologie Diagnostic Oncology Group (RDOG) study of lung cancer Staging, the CT and MR examinations of 40 patients suspected of having non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma were blindly interpreted by four expert observers. The primary tumor and lymph node stages in the 40 study subjects were similar to the final proportions reported in the RDOG study. Assessed abnormalities included the presence of a lung nodule, ehest wall invasion, mediastinal invasion, bronchial involvement, lymph node metastasis in specific node stations, and T and N classifications. Percent agreement and K-values were calculated for each of these determinations. Results: Depending on the finding assessed and the method of analysis, average agreement rates ranged from 58 to 90% for CT and from 61 to 96% for MRI. Average K-values were largely between 0.40 and 0.60 when dichotomous analysis was used; weighted K-values were similar. With a single exception, no significant differences were found for K-values calculated for CT and MRI. Conclusion: Although interobserver agreement rates are good for determining T and N Classification in patients with lung cancer, variability in image interpretation is frequent, even among experienced observers.

KW - Cancer

KW - Comparative studies

KW - Comparative studies

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Lungs

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027431126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027431126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8227566

AN - SCOPUS:0027431126

VL - 17

SP - 841

EP - 846

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 6

ER -