TY - JOUR
T1 - Intermediate care to intensive care triage
T2 - A quality improvement project to reduce mortality
AU - Hager, David N.
AU - Chandrashekar, Pranav
AU - Bradsher, Robert W.
AU - Abdel-Halim, Ali M.
AU - Chatterjee, Souvik
AU - Sawyer, Melinda
AU - Brower, Roy G.
AU - Needham, Dale M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Ali M. Abdel-Halim, BA was supported by NIH HL084762 . No other authors received any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors for this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Purpose Medical patients whose care needs exceed what is feasible on a general ward, but who do not clearly require critical care, may be admitted to an intermediate care unit (IMCU). Some IMCU patients deteriorate and require medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission. In 2012, staff in the Johns Hopkins IMCU expressed concern that patient acuity and the threshold for MICU admission were too high. Further, shared triage decision-making between residents and supervising physicians did not consistently occur. Methods To improve our triage process, we used a 4Es quality improvement framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) to (1) educate residents and fellows regarding principles of triage and (2) facilitate real-time communication between MICU residents conducting triage and supervising physicians. Results Among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU during baseline (n = 83;July–December 2012) and intervention phases (n = 94;July–December 2013), unadjusted mortality decreased from 34% to 21% (p = 0.06). After adjusting for severity of illness, admitting diagnosis, and bed availability, the odds of death were lower during the intervention vs. baseline phase (OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.11–0.98). Conclusions Using a structured quality improvement process targeting triage education and increased resident/supervisor communication, we demonstrated reduced mortality among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU.
AB - Purpose Medical patients whose care needs exceed what is feasible on a general ward, but who do not clearly require critical care, may be admitted to an intermediate care unit (IMCU). Some IMCU patients deteriorate and require medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission. In 2012, staff in the Johns Hopkins IMCU expressed concern that patient acuity and the threshold for MICU admission were too high. Further, shared triage decision-making between residents and supervising physicians did not consistently occur. Methods To improve our triage process, we used a 4Es quality improvement framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) to (1) educate residents and fellows regarding principles of triage and (2) facilitate real-time communication between MICU residents conducting triage and supervising physicians. Results Among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU during baseline (n = 83;July–December 2012) and intervention phases (n = 94;July–December 2013), unadjusted mortality decreased from 34% to 21% (p = 0.06). After adjusting for severity of illness, admitting diagnosis, and bed availability, the odds of death were lower during the intervention vs. baseline phase (OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.11–0.98). Conclusions Using a structured quality improvement process targeting triage education and increased resident/supervisor communication, we demonstrated reduced mortality among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU.
KW - Communication
KW - Critical care
KW - Internship and residency
KW - Medical education
KW - Patient safety
KW - Supervision
KW - Triage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037986291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037986291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 28810207
AN - SCOPUS:85037986291
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 42
SP - 282
EP - 288
JO - Seminars in Anesthesia
JF - Seminars in Anesthesia
ER -