Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging

Sirisha Donekal, Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh, Seth Berkowitz, Colin O. Wu, Eui Young Choi, Veronica Fernandes, Raymond Yan, Ahmed A. Harouni, David A. Bluemke, Joao A.C. Lima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the test-retest reliability of the measurement of regional myocardial function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) tagging using spatial modulation of magnetization. Methods. Twenty-five participants underwent CMR tagging twice over 12 ± 7 days. To assess the role of slice orientation on strain measurement, two healthy volunteers had a first exam, followed by image acquisition repeated with slices rotated ±15 degrees out of true short axis, followed by a second exam in the true short axis plane. To assess the role of slice location, two healthy volunteers had whole heart tagging. The harmonic phase (HARP) method was used to analyze the tagged images. Peak midwall circumferential strain (Ecc), radial strain (Err), Lambda 1, Lambda 2, and Angle α were determined in basal, mid and apical slices. LV torsion, systolic and early diastolic circumferential strain and torsion rates were also determined. Results: LV Ecc and torsion had excellent intra-, interobserver, and inter-study intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC range, 0.7 to 0.9). Err, Lambda 1, Lambda 2 and angle had excellent intra- and interobserver ICC than inter-study ICC. Angle had least inter-study reproducibility. Torsion rates had superior intra-, interobserver, and inter-study reproducibility to strain rates. The measurements of LV Ecc were comparable in all three slices with different short axis orientations (standard deviation of mean Ecc was 0.09, 0.18 and 0.16 at basal, mid and apical slices, respectively). The mean difference in LV Ecc between slices was more pronounced in most of the basal slices compared to the rest of the heart. Conclusions: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of all strain and torsion parameters was excellent. Inter-study reproducibility of CMR tagging by SPAMM varied between different parameters as described in the results above and was superior for Ecc and LV torsion. The variation in LV Ecc measurement due to altered slice orientation is negligible compared to the variation due to slice location. Trial registration. This trial is registered as NCT00005487 at National Heart, Lung and Blood institute.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number37
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • CMR tagging
  • Circumferential strain
  • HARP
  • Principal strains
  • Radial strain
  • SPAMM
  • Test-retest reproducibility
  • Torsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Donekal, S., Ambale-Venkatesh, B., Berkowitz, S., Wu, C. O., Choi, E. Y., Fernandes, V., Yan, R., Harouni, A. A., Bluemke, D. A., & Lima, J. A. C. (2013). Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15(1), [37]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-37