Intent of reporting standards: Reply to rossiter (2018)

Mark Appelbaum, Harris Cooper, Rex B. Kline, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Arthur M. Nezu, Stephen M. Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

In this reply to Rossiter (2018), we note that the goal of developing Journal Article Reporting Standards has been to specify the kinds of information that should be provided to the readers of scientific articles in order to allow maximal understanding of the work being reported-in the case of psychometrics, information that demonstrates the underlying adequacy of the measures used in the research being reported. Although we illustrate some kinds of items that might be utilized to make these demonstrations, the illustrations are not proscriptive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)932
Number of pages1
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Psychometrics
  • Reporting standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intent of reporting standards: Reply to rossiter (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this