Intensive care unit safety incidents for medical versus surgical patients: A prospective multicenter study

David J. Sinopoli, Dale Needham, David Thompson, Christine G. Holzmueller, Todd Dorman, Lisa Lubomski, Albert W Wu, Laura Morlock, Martin A Makary, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine if patient safety incidents and the system-related factors contributing to them systematically differ for medical versus surgical patients in intensive care units. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study of 646 incidents involving adult medical patients and 707 incidents involving adult surgical patients that were reported to an anonymous patient safety registry over a 2-year period. We compared incident characteristics, patient harm, and associated system factors for medical versus surgical patients. Results: The proportion of safety incidents reported for medical versus surgical patients differed for only 3 of 11 categories: equipment/devices (14% vs 19%; P = .02), "line, tube, or drain" events (8% vs 13%; P = .001), and computerized physician order entry (13% vs 6%; P ≤ .001). The type of patient harm associated with incidents also did not differ. System factors were similar for medical versus surgical patients, with training and teamwork being the most important factors in both groups. Conclusions: Medical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit experience very similar types of safety incidents with similar associated patient harm and system factors. Common initiatives to improve patient safety for medical and surgical patients should be undertaken with a specific focus on improving training and teamwork among the intensive care team.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Multicenter Studies
Intensive Care Units
Prospective Studies
Safety
Patient Harm
Patient Safety
Medical Order Entry Systems
Equipment and Supplies
Critical Care
Registries

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Incident reporting
  • Intensive care units
  • Medical errors
  • Safety management
  • Sentinel surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Intensive care unit safety incidents for medical versus surgical patients : A prospective multicenter study. / Sinopoli, David J.; Needham, Dale; Thompson, David; Holzmueller, Christine G.; Dorman, Todd; Lubomski, Lisa; Wu, Albert W; Morlock, Laura; Makary, Martin A; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 22, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 177-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a321207ad1ba400d8b9cf67ac7e7ea85,
title = "Intensive care unit safety incidents for medical versus surgical patients: A prospective multicenter study",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine if patient safety incidents and the system-related factors contributing to them systematically differ for medical versus surgical patients in intensive care units. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study of 646 incidents involving adult medical patients and 707 incidents involving adult surgical patients that were reported to an anonymous patient safety registry over a 2-year period. We compared incident characteristics, patient harm, and associated system factors for medical versus surgical patients. Results: The proportion of safety incidents reported for medical versus surgical patients differed for only 3 of 11 categories: equipment/devices (14{\%} vs 19{\%}; P = .02), {"}line, tube, or drain{"} events (8{\%} vs 13{\%}; P = .001), and computerized physician order entry (13{\%} vs 6{\%}; P ≤ .001). The type of patient harm associated with incidents also did not differ. System factors were similar for medical versus surgical patients, with training and teamwork being the most important factors in both groups. Conclusions: Medical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit experience very similar types of safety incidents with similar associated patient harm and system factors. Common initiatives to improve patient safety for medical and surgical patients should be undertaken with a specific focus on improving training and teamwork among the intensive care team.",
keywords = "Critical care, Incident reporting, Intensive care units, Medical errors, Safety management, Sentinel surveillance",
author = "Sinopoli, {David J.} and Dale Needham and David Thompson and Holzmueller, {Christine G.} and Todd Dorman and Lisa Lubomski and Wu, {Albert W} and Laura Morlock and Makary, {Martin A} and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.11.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "177--183",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensive care unit safety incidents for medical versus surgical patients

T2 - A prospective multicenter study

AU - Sinopoli, David J.

AU - Needham, Dale

AU - Thompson, David

AU - Holzmueller, Christine G.

AU - Dorman, Todd

AU - Lubomski, Lisa

AU - Wu, Albert W

AU - Morlock, Laura

AU - Makary, Martin A

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine if patient safety incidents and the system-related factors contributing to them systematically differ for medical versus surgical patients in intensive care units. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study of 646 incidents involving adult medical patients and 707 incidents involving adult surgical patients that were reported to an anonymous patient safety registry over a 2-year period. We compared incident characteristics, patient harm, and associated system factors for medical versus surgical patients. Results: The proportion of safety incidents reported for medical versus surgical patients differed for only 3 of 11 categories: equipment/devices (14% vs 19%; P = .02), "line, tube, or drain" events (8% vs 13%; P = .001), and computerized physician order entry (13% vs 6%; P ≤ .001). The type of patient harm associated with incidents also did not differ. System factors were similar for medical versus surgical patients, with training and teamwork being the most important factors in both groups. Conclusions: Medical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit experience very similar types of safety incidents with similar associated patient harm and system factors. Common initiatives to improve patient safety for medical and surgical patients should be undertaken with a specific focus on improving training and teamwork among the intensive care team.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine if patient safety incidents and the system-related factors contributing to them systematically differ for medical versus surgical patients in intensive care units. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study of 646 incidents involving adult medical patients and 707 incidents involving adult surgical patients that were reported to an anonymous patient safety registry over a 2-year period. We compared incident characteristics, patient harm, and associated system factors for medical versus surgical patients. Results: The proportion of safety incidents reported for medical versus surgical patients differed for only 3 of 11 categories: equipment/devices (14% vs 19%; P = .02), "line, tube, or drain" events (8% vs 13%; P = .001), and computerized physician order entry (13% vs 6%; P ≤ .001). The type of patient harm associated with incidents also did not differ. System factors were similar for medical versus surgical patients, with training and teamwork being the most important factors in both groups. Conclusions: Medical and surgical patients in the intensive care unit experience very similar types of safety incidents with similar associated patient harm and system factors. Common initiatives to improve patient safety for medical and surgical patients should be undertaken with a specific focus on improving training and teamwork among the intensive care team.

KW - Critical care

KW - Incident reporting

KW - Intensive care units

KW - Medical errors

KW - Safety management

KW - Sentinel surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548508223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548508223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.11.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 17869966

AN - SCOPUS:34548508223

VL - 22

SP - 177

EP - 183

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 3

ER -