Integrating e-prescribing and pharmacy claims data for predictive modeling: Comparing costs and utilization of health plan members who fill their initial medications with those who do not

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonfilling of prescribed medications is a worldwide problem of serious concern. Studies of health care costs and utilization associated with medication nonadherence frequently rely on claims data and usually focus on patients with specific conditions. Past studies also have little agreement on whether higher medication costs associated with higher adherence can reduce downstream health care consumption. OBJECTIVES: To (a) compare the characteristics between people with and without complete medication initiations from a general population and (b) quantify the effect of medication initiation on health care utilization and expenditures with propensity score weighting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2012 and 2013 electronic health records (EHR) and insurance claims data from an integrated health care delivery network. We included 43,097 eligible primary care patients in the study. Annual medication fill rates of initial prescriptions in 2012 were defined as the number of filled prescriptions from claims divided by the number of e-prescriptions from EHRs, while excluding all refills. A claim was considered filled if (a) EHR and claims records were from the same drug class; (b) claims occurred between the date of a current EHR order and that of the next EHR order of the same class; and (c) the maximum fill rate was 100%. The 6 annual outcomes included total costs, medical costs, pharmacy costs, being a high-cost “outlier” (in top 5%), having 1 or more hospitalizations, and having 1 or more emergency department (ED) visits. Individuals were classified as either having completed all medication initiations (100% annual filling rate for initiations) or not. We used propensity score weighting to control for baseline differences between complete and incomplete initial fillers. We adopted linear and logistic regressions to model costs and binary utilization indicators for the same year (concurrently) and next year (prospectively). RESULTS: Approximately 42% of the study sample had complete medication initiations (100% filling rate), while the remaining 58% had incomplete initiations. Individuals who fully filled initial prescriptions had lower comorbidity burden and consumed fewer health care resources. After applying propensity score weighting and controlling for variables such as the number of prescription orders, patients with complete medication initiations had lower overall and medical costs, concurrently and prospectively (e.g., $751 and $252 less for annual total costs). Complete medication initiation fillers were also less likely to have concurrent health care utilization (OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.68-0.90 for hospitalization; OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.72-0.82 for ED admissions) but no difference in prospective utilization other than for ED visits (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.87-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the subpopulation of patients with incomplete medication initiations (i.e., filling less than 100% of initial prescriptions) is a pragmatic approach for population health management programs to align resources and potentially contain cost and utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1282-1290
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating e-prescribing and pharmacy claims data for predictive modeling: Comparing costs and utilization of health plan members who fill their initial medications with those who do not'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this