Integrated community case management for childhood illnesses: Explaining policy resistance in Kenya

Pamela A. Juma, Karen Owuor, Sara C Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There has been a re-emphasis recently on community health workers to provide child health care services including integrated community case management for childhood illness (iCCM). This research analysed iCCM policy development in Kenya and in particular the types of decision-making criteria used by Kenyan policy-makers in considering whether to advance iCCM policy. Method: Data were collected through document reviews (n = 41) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) with key stakeholders in iCCM policy including government officials, development partners, bilateral donors, and civil society organizations. Initial analysis was guided by the policy triangle with further analysis of factors affecting policy decision-making drawing upon a simple framework developed by Grindle and Thomas (Policy makers, policy choices and policy outcomes: the political economy of reform in developing countries. 1989; Policy Sci 22:213-48.). Findings: Policy development for iCCM has been slow in Kenya, compared with other Sub-Saharan African countries. At the time of the study, the Government had just completed the Community Health Training Manual which incorporated iCCM as a module, but this was the only formal expression of iCCM in Kenya. We found technical considerations, notably concerns about community health workers dispensing antibiotics to be a key factor slowing iCCM policy development, but this also overlapped with bureaucratic considerations, such as how the development of community health worker cadres may affect clinicians, as well as initial concerns about how an integrated approach might affect vertically oriented programs. International actors through agreements such as the Millennium Development Goals helped to get child survival onto the national policy agenda and such actors were active promoters of iCCM policy change. However international funders had not committed funding to scale-up iCCM policy, and this probably constrained their influence over iCCM policy debate. Conclusion: Kenyan actors' concerns about iCCM underline the importance of adapting global policies to local conditions, and also generating local evidence to inform decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)ii65-ii73
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Kenya
Case Management
Policy Making
Decision Making
Administrative Personnel
Child Health Services
Time and Motion Studies
Child Care
Developing Countries
Statistical Factor Analysis

Keywords

  • Case management
  • child health
  • Kenya
  • policy analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Integrated community case management for childhood illnesses : Explaining policy resistance in Kenya. / Juma, Pamela A.; Owuor, Karen; Bennett, Sara C.

In: Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 30, 01.12.2015, p. ii65-ii73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f97f06ff747405aa74a42d3d6d460c7,
title = "Integrated community case management for childhood illnesses: Explaining policy resistance in Kenya",
abstract = "Background: There has been a re-emphasis recently on community health workers to provide child health care services including integrated community case management for childhood illness (iCCM). This research analysed iCCM policy development in Kenya and in particular the types of decision-making criteria used by Kenyan policy-makers in considering whether to advance iCCM policy. Method: Data were collected through document reviews (n = 41) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) with key stakeholders in iCCM policy including government officials, development partners, bilateral donors, and civil society organizations. Initial analysis was guided by the policy triangle with further analysis of factors affecting policy decision-making drawing upon a simple framework developed by Grindle and Thomas (Policy makers, policy choices and policy outcomes: the political economy of reform in developing countries. 1989; Policy Sci 22:213-48.). Findings: Policy development for iCCM has been slow in Kenya, compared with other Sub-Saharan African countries. At the time of the study, the Government had just completed the Community Health Training Manual which incorporated iCCM as a module, but this was the only formal expression of iCCM in Kenya. We found technical considerations, notably concerns about community health workers dispensing antibiotics to be a key factor slowing iCCM policy development, but this also overlapped with bureaucratic considerations, such as how the development of community health worker cadres may affect clinicians, as well as initial concerns about how an integrated approach might affect vertically oriented programs. International actors through agreements such as the Millennium Development Goals helped to get child survival onto the national policy agenda and such actors were active promoters of iCCM policy change. However international funders had not committed funding to scale-up iCCM policy, and this probably constrained their influence over iCCM policy debate. Conclusion: Kenyan actors' concerns about iCCM underline the importance of adapting global policies to local conditions, and also generating local evidence to inform decision-making.",
keywords = "Case management, child health, Kenya, policy analysis",
author = "Juma, {Pamela A.} and Karen Owuor and Bennett, {Sara C}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/heapol/czv094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "ii65--ii73",
journal = "Health Policy and Planning",
issn = "0268-1080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrated community case management for childhood illnesses

T2 - Explaining policy resistance in Kenya

AU - Juma, Pamela A.

AU - Owuor, Karen

AU - Bennett, Sara C

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: There has been a re-emphasis recently on community health workers to provide child health care services including integrated community case management for childhood illness (iCCM). This research analysed iCCM policy development in Kenya and in particular the types of decision-making criteria used by Kenyan policy-makers in considering whether to advance iCCM policy. Method: Data were collected through document reviews (n = 41) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) with key stakeholders in iCCM policy including government officials, development partners, bilateral donors, and civil society organizations. Initial analysis was guided by the policy triangle with further analysis of factors affecting policy decision-making drawing upon a simple framework developed by Grindle and Thomas (Policy makers, policy choices and policy outcomes: the political economy of reform in developing countries. 1989; Policy Sci 22:213-48.). Findings: Policy development for iCCM has been slow in Kenya, compared with other Sub-Saharan African countries. At the time of the study, the Government had just completed the Community Health Training Manual which incorporated iCCM as a module, but this was the only formal expression of iCCM in Kenya. We found technical considerations, notably concerns about community health workers dispensing antibiotics to be a key factor slowing iCCM policy development, but this also overlapped with bureaucratic considerations, such as how the development of community health worker cadres may affect clinicians, as well as initial concerns about how an integrated approach might affect vertically oriented programs. International actors through agreements such as the Millennium Development Goals helped to get child survival onto the national policy agenda and such actors were active promoters of iCCM policy change. However international funders had not committed funding to scale-up iCCM policy, and this probably constrained their influence over iCCM policy debate. Conclusion: Kenyan actors' concerns about iCCM underline the importance of adapting global policies to local conditions, and also generating local evidence to inform decision-making.

AB - Background: There has been a re-emphasis recently on community health workers to provide child health care services including integrated community case management for childhood illness (iCCM). This research analysed iCCM policy development in Kenya and in particular the types of decision-making criteria used by Kenyan policy-makers in considering whether to advance iCCM policy. Method: Data were collected through document reviews (n = 41) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) with key stakeholders in iCCM policy including government officials, development partners, bilateral donors, and civil society organizations. Initial analysis was guided by the policy triangle with further analysis of factors affecting policy decision-making drawing upon a simple framework developed by Grindle and Thomas (Policy makers, policy choices and policy outcomes: the political economy of reform in developing countries. 1989; Policy Sci 22:213-48.). Findings: Policy development for iCCM has been slow in Kenya, compared with other Sub-Saharan African countries. At the time of the study, the Government had just completed the Community Health Training Manual which incorporated iCCM as a module, but this was the only formal expression of iCCM in Kenya. We found technical considerations, notably concerns about community health workers dispensing antibiotics to be a key factor slowing iCCM policy development, but this also overlapped with bureaucratic considerations, such as how the development of community health worker cadres may affect clinicians, as well as initial concerns about how an integrated approach might affect vertically oriented programs. International actors through agreements such as the Millennium Development Goals helped to get child survival onto the national policy agenda and such actors were active promoters of iCCM policy change. However international funders had not committed funding to scale-up iCCM policy, and this probably constrained their influence over iCCM policy debate. Conclusion: Kenyan actors' concerns about iCCM underline the importance of adapting global policies to local conditions, and also generating local evidence to inform decision-making.

KW - Case management

KW - child health

KW - Kenya

KW - policy analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950327521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950327521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/heapol/czv094

DO - 10.1093/heapol/czv094

M3 - Article

C2 - 26516152

AN - SCOPUS:84950327521

VL - 30

SP - ii65-ii73

JO - Health Policy and Planning

JF - Health Policy and Planning

SN - 0268-1080

ER -