Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma

Wendy R. Greene, Tolulope A. Oyetunji, Umar Bowers, Adil H. Haider, Thomas A. Mellman, Edward E. Cornwell, Suryanarayana M. Siram, David C. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year. Results: A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7%. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9% vs 3.0%; P <.001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3% vs 3.2%; P <.001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance. Conclusions: Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-557
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume199
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Insurance Coverage
Wounds and Injuries
Insurance
Multivariate Analysis
Injury Severity Score
Mortality
Medicaid
Craniocerebral Trauma
Teaching Hospitals
Shock
Extremities

Keywords

  • Health disparities
  • Insurance status
  • Mechanism of injury
  • National trauma data bank
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Greene, W. R., Oyetunji, T. A., Bowers, U., Haider, A. H., Mellman, T. A., Cornwell, E. E., ... Chang, D. C. (2010). Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma. American Journal of Surgery, 199(4), 554-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005

Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma. / Greene, Wendy R.; Oyetunji, Tolulope A.; Bowers, Umar; Haider, Adil H.; Mellman, Thomas A.; Cornwell, Edward E.; Siram, Suryanarayana M.; Chang, David C.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 199, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 554-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greene, WR, Oyetunji, TA, Bowers, U, Haider, AH, Mellman, TA, Cornwell, EE, Siram, SM & Chang, DC 2010, 'Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 554-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005
Greene, Wendy R. ; Oyetunji, Tolulope A. ; Bowers, Umar ; Haider, Adil H. ; Mellman, Thomas A. ; Cornwell, Edward E. ; Siram, Suryanarayana M. ; Chang, David C. / Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 199, No. 4. pp. 554-557.
@article{d765e46b99514a9cadc4e2b95638b37e,
title = "Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma",
abstract = "Background: Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year. Results: A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7{\%}. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9{\%} vs 3.0{\%}; P <.001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3{\%} vs 3.2{\%}; P <.001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance. Conclusions: Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.",
keywords = "Health disparities, Insurance status, Mechanism of injury, National trauma data bank, Outcomes",
author = "Greene, {Wendy R.} and Oyetunji, {Tolulope A.} and Umar Bowers and Haider, {Adil H.} and Mellman, {Thomas A.} and Cornwell, {Edward E.} and Siram, {Suryanarayana M.} and Chang, {David C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
pages = "554--557",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma

AU - Greene, Wendy R.

AU - Oyetunji, Tolulope A.

AU - Bowers, Umar

AU - Haider, Adil H.

AU - Mellman, Thomas A.

AU - Cornwell, Edward E.

AU - Siram, Suryanarayana M.

AU - Chang, David C.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Background: Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year. Results: A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7%. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9% vs 3.0%; P <.001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3% vs 3.2%; P <.001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance. Conclusions: Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.

AB - Background: Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year. Results: A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7%. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9% vs 3.0%; P <.001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3% vs 3.2%; P <.001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance. Conclusions: Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.

KW - Health disparities

KW - Insurance status

KW - Mechanism of injury

KW - National trauma data bank

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949900950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949900950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 199

SP - 554

EP - 557

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -