Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences

Jeff Niederdeppe, Sarah E. Gollust, Colleen L Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed increased scholarly attention to the competitive and dynamic nature of message framing in shaping public opinion. The current study extends our understanding of competitive framing in the context of public opinion about taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) using insights from communication research on inoculation theory. We report on a two-wave longitudinal framing experiment (N = 3,118), testing effects of eight different experimental conditions, to examine the impact of exposure to several combinations of pro-tax frames, anti-tax frames, and inoculation as a counterframing strategy, relative to a no-exposure control group. Respondents exposed to an inoculation message that illuminated source motives and preemptively refuted soda company arguments elicited more favorable opinions of SSB taxes immediately after exposure compared with those not exposed to any message. Immediate effects of the inoculation message on policy opinions occurred via two complementary psychological mechanisms: a persuasion effect via changes in beliefs about soda companies (the source of the attitudinal threat described in the inoculation message) and an applicability effect via changes in the salience of beliefs about soda companies in shaping tax support. Inoculation did not, however, produce sustained resistance to subsequent strong anti-tax frame exposure in an asymmetric competitive framing context. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for future work on competitive framing in a US policy context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)634-655
Number of pages22
JournalPublic Opinion Quarterly
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Taxation
taxes
public opinion
Beverages
Sugars
communication research
persuasion
Exposure controls
Industry
threat
Tax
Inoculation
experiment
Group
Communication
Testing
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences. / Niederdeppe, Jeff; Gollust, Sarah E.; Barry, Colleen L.

In: Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 3, 2014, p. 634-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niederdeppe, Jeff ; Gollust, Sarah E. ; Barry, Colleen L. / Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences. In: Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014 ; Vol. 78, No. 3. pp. 634-655.
@article{f0a157c6841d4bd391edd64879eb915a,
title = "Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences",
abstract = "Recent years have witnessed increased scholarly attention to the competitive and dynamic nature of message framing in shaping public opinion. The current study extends our understanding of competitive framing in the context of public opinion about taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) using insights from communication research on inoculation theory. We report on a two-wave longitudinal framing experiment (N = 3,118), testing effects of eight different experimental conditions, to examine the impact of exposure to several combinations of pro-tax frames, anti-tax frames, and inoculation as a counterframing strategy, relative to a no-exposure control group. Respondents exposed to an inoculation message that illuminated source motives and preemptively refuted soda company arguments elicited more favorable opinions of SSB taxes immediately after exposure compared with those not exposed to any message. Immediate effects of the inoculation message on policy opinions occurred via two complementary psychological mechanisms: a persuasion effect via changes in beliefs about soda companies (the source of the attitudinal threat described in the inoculation message) and an applicability effect via changes in the salience of beliefs about soda companies in shaping tax support. Inoculation did not, however, produce sustained resistance to subsequent strong anti-tax frame exposure in an asymmetric competitive framing context. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for future work on competitive framing in a US policy context.",
author = "Jeff Niederdeppe and Gollust, {Sarah E.} and Barry, {Colleen L}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/poq/nfu026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "634--655",
journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",
issn = "0033-362X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences

AU - Niederdeppe, Jeff

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

AU - Barry, Colleen L

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent years have witnessed increased scholarly attention to the competitive and dynamic nature of message framing in shaping public opinion. The current study extends our understanding of competitive framing in the context of public opinion about taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) using insights from communication research on inoculation theory. We report on a two-wave longitudinal framing experiment (N = 3,118), testing effects of eight different experimental conditions, to examine the impact of exposure to several combinations of pro-tax frames, anti-tax frames, and inoculation as a counterframing strategy, relative to a no-exposure control group. Respondents exposed to an inoculation message that illuminated source motives and preemptively refuted soda company arguments elicited more favorable opinions of SSB taxes immediately after exposure compared with those not exposed to any message. Immediate effects of the inoculation message on policy opinions occurred via two complementary psychological mechanisms: a persuasion effect via changes in beliefs about soda companies (the source of the attitudinal threat described in the inoculation message) and an applicability effect via changes in the salience of beliefs about soda companies in shaping tax support. Inoculation did not, however, produce sustained resistance to subsequent strong anti-tax frame exposure in an asymmetric competitive framing context. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for future work on competitive framing in a US policy context.

AB - Recent years have witnessed increased scholarly attention to the competitive and dynamic nature of message framing in shaping public opinion. The current study extends our understanding of competitive framing in the context of public opinion about taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) using insights from communication research on inoculation theory. We report on a two-wave longitudinal framing experiment (N = 3,118), testing effects of eight different experimental conditions, to examine the impact of exposure to several combinations of pro-tax frames, anti-tax frames, and inoculation as a counterframing strategy, relative to a no-exposure control group. Respondents exposed to an inoculation message that illuminated source motives and preemptively refuted soda company arguments elicited more favorable opinions of SSB taxes immediately after exposure compared with those not exposed to any message. Immediate effects of the inoculation message on policy opinions occurred via two complementary psychological mechanisms: a persuasion effect via changes in beliefs about soda companies (the source of the attitudinal threat described in the inoculation message) and an applicability effect via changes in the salience of beliefs about soda companies in shaping tax support. Inoculation did not, however, produce sustained resistance to subsequent strong anti-tax frame exposure in an asymmetric competitive framing context. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for future work on competitive framing in a US policy context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928790041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928790041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/poq/nfu026

DO - 10.1093/poq/nfu026

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928790041

VL - 78

SP - 634

EP - 655

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

SN - 0033-362X

IS - 3

ER -