Inhospital CPR 25 years later: Why has survival decreased?

Peter E. Dans, Katherine L. Nevin, Christine E. Seidman, Justin Charles McArthur, Steven T. Kariya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the introduction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 25 years ago, there have been many advances in cardiopulmonary technology and in our understanding of the factors leading to a successful outcome. Despite these advances, our study of outcomes in 88 patients having CPR at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1981 revealed a 14% survival rate to discharge compared with 24% from the same hospital from 1959 to 1961. We found that 74% of the 46 patients who initially survived CPR died before discharge. In addition, two of 12 survivors at discharge were dead one week later and one was in a persistent vegetative state three years after CPR. Our findings suggest that this technology, once meant to be applied when cardiac arrest was sudden and unexpected, is now being applied to patients regardless of underlying condition or prognosis. A follow-up survey of 63 Maryland hospitals revealed that many lacked formal plans for CPR management or education. We recommend that a comprehensive approach to CPR be adopted by all hospitals, involving (1) education regarding appropriate patient selection, (2) assurance of skilled application and backup care for survivors, and (3) a mechanism for routinely monitoring outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1174-1178
Number of pages5
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume78
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Survival
Survivors
Technology
Persistent Vegetative State
Education
Sudden Cardiac Death
Patient Selection
Survival Rate
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dans, P. E., Nevin, K. L., Seidman, C. E., McArthur, J. C., & Kariya, S. T. (1985). Inhospital CPR 25 years later: Why has survival decreased? Southern Medical Journal, 78(10), 1174-1178.

Inhospital CPR 25 years later : Why has survival decreased? / Dans, Peter E.; Nevin, Katherine L.; Seidman, Christine E.; McArthur, Justin Charles; Kariya, Steven T.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 78, No. 10, 1985, p. 1174-1178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dans, PE, Nevin, KL, Seidman, CE, McArthur, JC & Kariya, ST 1985, 'Inhospital CPR 25 years later: Why has survival decreased?', Southern Medical Journal, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1174-1178.
Dans PE, Nevin KL, Seidman CE, McArthur JC, Kariya ST. Inhospital CPR 25 years later: Why has survival decreased? Southern Medical Journal. 1985;78(10):1174-1178.
Dans, Peter E. ; Nevin, Katherine L. ; Seidman, Christine E. ; McArthur, Justin Charles ; Kariya, Steven T. / Inhospital CPR 25 years later : Why has survival decreased?. In: Southern Medical Journal. 1985 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 1174-1178.
@article{266d73e4fcc64eda968ca3a86af65d4c,
title = "Inhospital CPR 25 years later: Why has survival decreased?",
abstract = "Since the introduction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 25 years ago, there have been many advances in cardiopulmonary technology and in our understanding of the factors leading to a successful outcome. Despite these advances, our study of outcomes in 88 patients having CPR at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1981 revealed a 14{\%} survival rate to discharge compared with 24{\%} from the same hospital from 1959 to 1961. We found that 74{\%} of the 46 patients who initially survived CPR died before discharge. In addition, two of 12 survivors at discharge were dead one week later and one was in a persistent vegetative state three years after CPR. Our findings suggest that this technology, once meant to be applied when cardiac arrest was sudden and unexpected, is now being applied to patients regardless of underlying condition or prognosis. A follow-up survey of 63 Maryland hospitals revealed that many lacked formal plans for CPR management or education. We recommend that a comprehensive approach to CPR be adopted by all hospitals, involving (1) education regarding appropriate patient selection, (2) assurance of skilled application and backup care for survivors, and (3) a mechanism for routinely monitoring outcome.",
author = "Dans, {Peter E.} and Nevin, {Katherine L.} and Seidman, {Christine E.} and McArthur, {Justin Charles} and Kariya, {Steven T.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1174--1178",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhospital CPR 25 years later

T2 - Why has survival decreased?

AU - Dans, Peter E.

AU - Nevin, Katherine L.

AU - Seidman, Christine E.

AU - McArthur, Justin Charles

AU - Kariya, Steven T.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Since the introduction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 25 years ago, there have been many advances in cardiopulmonary technology and in our understanding of the factors leading to a successful outcome. Despite these advances, our study of outcomes in 88 patients having CPR at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1981 revealed a 14% survival rate to discharge compared with 24% from the same hospital from 1959 to 1961. We found that 74% of the 46 patients who initially survived CPR died before discharge. In addition, two of 12 survivors at discharge were dead one week later and one was in a persistent vegetative state three years after CPR. Our findings suggest that this technology, once meant to be applied when cardiac arrest was sudden and unexpected, is now being applied to patients regardless of underlying condition or prognosis. A follow-up survey of 63 Maryland hospitals revealed that many lacked formal plans for CPR management or education. We recommend that a comprehensive approach to CPR be adopted by all hospitals, involving (1) education regarding appropriate patient selection, (2) assurance of skilled application and backup care for survivors, and (3) a mechanism for routinely monitoring outcome.

AB - Since the introduction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 25 years ago, there have been many advances in cardiopulmonary technology and in our understanding of the factors leading to a successful outcome. Despite these advances, our study of outcomes in 88 patients having CPR at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1981 revealed a 14% survival rate to discharge compared with 24% from the same hospital from 1959 to 1961. We found that 74% of the 46 patients who initially survived CPR died before discharge. In addition, two of 12 survivors at discharge were dead one week later and one was in a persistent vegetative state three years after CPR. Our findings suggest that this technology, once meant to be applied when cardiac arrest was sudden and unexpected, is now being applied to patients regardless of underlying condition or prognosis. A follow-up survey of 63 Maryland hospitals revealed that many lacked formal plans for CPR management or education. We recommend that a comprehensive approach to CPR be adopted by all hospitals, involving (1) education regarding appropriate patient selection, (2) assurance of skilled application and backup care for survivors, and (3) a mechanism for routinely monitoring outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022213842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022213842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 4049035

AN - SCOPUS:0022213842

VL - 78

SP - 1174

EP - 1178

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 10

ER -