Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments

Bradley S. Gibson, Howard E Egeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the present study the temporal order judgment (TOJ) task was used to investigate whether or not inhibition of return (IOR) affects perceptual processing. Previous failures to obtain IOR in the TOJ task have been taken to suggest that IOR does not affect perceptual processing (e.g., Maylor, 1985). The present study showed that IOR is modulated by the temporal disparity between successive targets as well as the relative order in which they appear at cued and uncued locations. Consequently, IOR affects TOJs in some conditions but not in others. The selective occurrence of IOR in the TOJ task provides converging support for the notion that IOR does affect perceptual processing, and also accounts for the previous failures to observe IOR in the TOJ task. Moreover, these and other results suggest that inhibitory processing at the cued location can be dis-inhibited when stimulation occurs at other locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-680
Number of pages12
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1994

Fingerprint

evidence
Temporal Order Judgment
Inhibition of Return
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Inhibition and disinhibition of return : Evidence from temporal order judgments. / Gibson, Bradley S.; Egeth, Howard E.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 56, No. 6, 11.1994, p. 669-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a63ef23171764fcea2dd552e86c33b8d,
title = "Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments",
abstract = "In the present study the temporal order judgment (TOJ) task was used to investigate whether or not inhibition of return (IOR) affects perceptual processing. Previous failures to obtain IOR in the TOJ task have been taken to suggest that IOR does not affect perceptual processing (e.g., Maylor, 1985). The present study showed that IOR is modulated by the temporal disparity between successive targets as well as the relative order in which they appear at cued and uncued locations. Consequently, IOR affects TOJs in some conditions but not in others. The selective occurrence of IOR in the TOJ task provides converging support for the notion that IOR does affect perceptual processing, and also accounts for the previous failures to observe IOR in the TOJ task. Moreover, these and other results suggest that inhibitory processing at the cued location can be dis-inhibited when stimulation occurs at other locations.",
author = "Gibson, {Bradley S.} and Egeth, {Howard E}",
year = "1994",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3758/BF03208360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "669--680",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibition and disinhibition of return

T2 - Evidence from temporal order judgments

AU - Gibson, Bradley S.

AU - Egeth, Howard E

PY - 1994/11

Y1 - 1994/11

N2 - In the present study the temporal order judgment (TOJ) task was used to investigate whether or not inhibition of return (IOR) affects perceptual processing. Previous failures to obtain IOR in the TOJ task have been taken to suggest that IOR does not affect perceptual processing (e.g., Maylor, 1985). The present study showed that IOR is modulated by the temporal disparity between successive targets as well as the relative order in which they appear at cued and uncued locations. Consequently, IOR affects TOJs in some conditions but not in others. The selective occurrence of IOR in the TOJ task provides converging support for the notion that IOR does affect perceptual processing, and also accounts for the previous failures to observe IOR in the TOJ task. Moreover, these and other results suggest that inhibitory processing at the cued location can be dis-inhibited when stimulation occurs at other locations.

AB - In the present study the temporal order judgment (TOJ) task was used to investigate whether or not inhibition of return (IOR) affects perceptual processing. Previous failures to obtain IOR in the TOJ task have been taken to suggest that IOR does not affect perceptual processing (e.g., Maylor, 1985). The present study showed that IOR is modulated by the temporal disparity between successive targets as well as the relative order in which they appear at cued and uncued locations. Consequently, IOR affects TOJs in some conditions but not in others. The selective occurrence of IOR in the TOJ task provides converging support for the notion that IOR does affect perceptual processing, and also accounts for the previous failures to observe IOR in the TOJ task. Moreover, these and other results suggest that inhibitory processing at the cued location can be dis-inhibited when stimulation occurs at other locations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028725061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028725061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03208360

DO - 10.3758/BF03208360

M3 - Article

C2 - 7816537

AN - SCOPUS:0028725061

VL - 56

SP - 669

EP - 680

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 6

ER -