Infected total knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopic irrigation and debridement

Barry J. Waldman, Emmanuel Hostin, Michael A. Mont, David S. Hungerford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sixteen patients with infected total knee arthroplasties (4 postoperative and 12 late hematogenous) were treated by arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. All patients had ≤ 7 days of knee symptoms, and there were no radiographic signs of osteitis or prosthetic loosening. Six of the 16 original total knee arthroplasties (38%) did not need prosthesis removal at a mean follow-up of 64 months (range, 36-151 months). Ten other knees were treated with irrigation, debridement, and hardware removal within 7 weeks of the latest procedure used to try to retain components. Two (13%) of these cases ultimately required an arthrodesis for persistent infection. Although we still believe that this method is preferable to resorting immediately to implant removal for acute infections, arthroscopic debridement was less efficacious for most situations when compared with open treatment. We would use arthroscopic irrigation and debridement only under selected circumstances (medically unstable or anticoagulated patients).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-436
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Keywords

  • Arthroscopy
  • Infection
  • Open treatment
  • Total knee arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Infected total knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopic irrigation and debridement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this