Inequity measures for evaluations of environmental justice: A case study of close proximity to highways in New York City

Jerry O. Jacobson, Nicolas W. Hengartner, Thomas Louis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Assessments of environmental and territorial justice are similar in that both assess whether empirical relations between the spatial arrangement of undesirable hazards (or desirable public goods and services) and sociodemographic groups are consistent with notions of social justice, evaluating the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens (outcome equity) and the process that produces observed differences (process equity). Using proximity to major highways in New York City as a case study, we review methodological issues pertinent to both fields and discuss choice and computation of exposure measures, but focus primarily on measures of inequity. We present inequity measures computed from the empirically estimated joint distribution of exposure and demographics and compare them with traditional measures such as linear regression, logistic regression, and Theil's entropy index. We find that measures computed from the full joint distribution provide more unified, transparent, and intuitive operational definitions of inequity and show how the approach can be used to structure siting and decommissioning decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-43
Number of pages23
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

environmental justice
equity
justice
road
decommissioning
social justice
public service
evaluation
entropy
regression
logistics
hazard
spatial distribution
distribution
exposure
city
Group
goods and services
decision
index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Inequity measures for evaluations of environmental justice : A case study of close proximity to highways in New York City. / Jacobson, Jerry O.; Hengartner, Nicolas W.; Louis, Thomas.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 21-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8da223346644297bf98a801a0481939,
title = "Inequity measures for evaluations of environmental justice: A case study of close proximity to highways in New York City",
abstract = "Assessments of environmental and territorial justice are similar in that both assess whether empirical relations between the spatial arrangement of undesirable hazards (or desirable public goods and services) and sociodemographic groups are consistent with notions of social justice, evaluating the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens (outcome equity) and the process that produces observed differences (process equity). Using proximity to major highways in New York City as a case study, we review methodological issues pertinent to both fields and discuss choice and computation of exposure measures, but focus primarily on measures of inequity. We present inequity measures computed from the empirically estimated joint distribution of exposure and demographics and compare them with traditional measures such as linear regression, logistic regression, and Theil's entropy index. We find that measures computed from the full joint distribution provide more unified, transparent, and intuitive operational definitions of inequity and show how the approach can be used to structure siting and decommissioning decisions.",
author = "Jacobson, {Jerry O.} and Hengartner, {Nicolas W.} and Thomas Louis",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1068/a36225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "21--43",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inequity measures for evaluations of environmental justice

T2 - A case study of close proximity to highways in New York City

AU - Jacobson, Jerry O.

AU - Hengartner, Nicolas W.

AU - Louis, Thomas

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Assessments of environmental and territorial justice are similar in that both assess whether empirical relations between the spatial arrangement of undesirable hazards (or desirable public goods and services) and sociodemographic groups are consistent with notions of social justice, evaluating the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens (outcome equity) and the process that produces observed differences (process equity). Using proximity to major highways in New York City as a case study, we review methodological issues pertinent to both fields and discuss choice and computation of exposure measures, but focus primarily on measures of inequity. We present inequity measures computed from the empirically estimated joint distribution of exposure and demographics and compare them with traditional measures such as linear regression, logistic regression, and Theil's entropy index. We find that measures computed from the full joint distribution provide more unified, transparent, and intuitive operational definitions of inequity and show how the approach can be used to structure siting and decommissioning decisions.

AB - Assessments of environmental and territorial justice are similar in that both assess whether empirical relations between the spatial arrangement of undesirable hazards (or desirable public goods and services) and sociodemographic groups are consistent with notions of social justice, evaluating the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens (outcome equity) and the process that produces observed differences (process equity). Using proximity to major highways in New York City as a case study, we review methodological issues pertinent to both fields and discuss choice and computation of exposure measures, but focus primarily on measures of inequity. We present inequity measures computed from the empirically estimated joint distribution of exposure and demographics and compare them with traditional measures such as linear regression, logistic regression, and Theil's entropy index. We find that measures computed from the full joint distribution provide more unified, transparent, and intuitive operational definitions of inequity and show how the approach can be used to structure siting and decommissioning decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844292748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844292748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/a36225

DO - 10.1068/a36225

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13844292748

VL - 37

SP - 21

EP - 43

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 1

ER -