Incorporating the world health organization surgical safety checklist into practice at two hospitals in liberia

Christina Yuan, Denise Walsh, James L. Walsh, Rachelle Alpern, John Shakpeh, Elizabeth H. Bradley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The impact of the World Health Organization's Patient Safety Programme's 19-item Surgical Safety Checklist on surgical processes and outcomes was assessed in 2008-2009 at two hospitals in the resource-limited setting of Liberia. Methods: In the preintervention phase, data were prospectively collected on surgical processes and outcomes from 232 consecutively enrolled patients who were undergoing surgery. In the postintervention phase, data were collected on 249 consecutively enrolled patients after the introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association between the introduction of the checklist and surgical process and outcome measures. These analyses were conducted among the pooled data, as well as for data stratified by hospital. Results: The introduction of the checklist was associated with significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of overall surgical processes and surgical outcomes. The stratified analysis presented a more nuanced result by hospital. In Hospital 1, the checklist was significantly associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes but was not associated with improved surgical outcomes. In contrast, in Hospital 2, it was significantly associated with improved surgical outcomes but was not associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes. Conclusions: Although the implementation of a surgical safety checklist in Liberia was associated with significant improvements in processes and outcomes overall, differences at the hospital level suggest that the checklist's mechanism of improvement may be influenced by the availability of resources needed to complete recommended processes, variation in team functioning, and organizational context. Copyright 2012

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)254-260
Number of pages7
JournalJoint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
Volume38
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Liberia
Checklist
Safety
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Safety
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Incorporating the world health organization surgical safety checklist into practice at two hospitals in liberia. / Yuan, Christina; Walsh, Denise; Walsh, James L.; Alpern, Rachelle; Shakpeh, John; Bradley, Elizabeth H.

In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.01.2012, p. 254-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yuan, Christina ; Walsh, Denise ; Walsh, James L. ; Alpern, Rachelle ; Shakpeh, John ; Bradley, Elizabeth H. / Incorporating the world health organization surgical safety checklist into practice at two hospitals in liberia. In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2012 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 254-260.
@article{814fb141c97247e588326c269cdc234d,
title = "Incorporating the world health organization surgical safety checklist into practice at two hospitals in liberia",
abstract = "Background: The impact of the World Health Organization's Patient Safety Programme's 19-item Surgical Safety Checklist on surgical processes and outcomes was assessed in 2008-2009 at two hospitals in the resource-limited setting of Liberia. Methods: In the preintervention phase, data were prospectively collected on surgical processes and outcomes from 232 consecutively enrolled patients who were undergoing surgery. In the postintervention phase, data were collected on 249 consecutively enrolled patients after the introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association between the introduction of the checklist and surgical process and outcome measures. These analyses were conducted among the pooled data, as well as for data stratified by hospital. Results: The introduction of the checklist was associated with significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of overall surgical processes and surgical outcomes. The stratified analysis presented a more nuanced result by hospital. In Hospital 1, the checklist was significantly associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes but was not associated with improved surgical outcomes. In contrast, in Hospital 2, it was significantly associated with improved surgical outcomes but was not associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes. Conclusions: Although the implementation of a surgical safety checklist in Liberia was associated with significant improvements in processes and outcomes overall, differences at the hospital level suggest that the checklist's mechanism of improvement may be influenced by the availability of resources needed to complete recommended processes, variation in team functioning, and organizational context. Copyright 2012",
author = "Christina Yuan and Denise Walsh and Walsh, {James L.} and Rachelle Alpern and John Shakpeh and Bradley, {Elizabeth H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "254--260",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating the world health organization surgical safety checklist into practice at two hospitals in liberia

AU - Yuan, Christina

AU - Walsh, Denise

AU - Walsh, James L.

AU - Alpern, Rachelle

AU - Shakpeh, John

AU - Bradley, Elizabeth H.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background: The impact of the World Health Organization's Patient Safety Programme's 19-item Surgical Safety Checklist on surgical processes and outcomes was assessed in 2008-2009 at two hospitals in the resource-limited setting of Liberia. Methods: In the preintervention phase, data were prospectively collected on surgical processes and outcomes from 232 consecutively enrolled patients who were undergoing surgery. In the postintervention phase, data were collected on 249 consecutively enrolled patients after the introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association between the introduction of the checklist and surgical process and outcome measures. These analyses were conducted among the pooled data, as well as for data stratified by hospital. Results: The introduction of the checklist was associated with significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of overall surgical processes and surgical outcomes. The stratified analysis presented a more nuanced result by hospital. In Hospital 1, the checklist was significantly associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes but was not associated with improved surgical outcomes. In contrast, in Hospital 2, it was significantly associated with improved surgical outcomes but was not associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes. Conclusions: Although the implementation of a surgical safety checklist in Liberia was associated with significant improvements in processes and outcomes overall, differences at the hospital level suggest that the checklist's mechanism of improvement may be influenced by the availability of resources needed to complete recommended processes, variation in team functioning, and organizational context. Copyright 2012

AB - Background: The impact of the World Health Organization's Patient Safety Programme's 19-item Surgical Safety Checklist on surgical processes and outcomes was assessed in 2008-2009 at two hospitals in the resource-limited setting of Liberia. Methods: In the preintervention phase, data were prospectively collected on surgical processes and outcomes from 232 consecutively enrolled patients who were undergoing surgery. In the postintervention phase, data were collected on 249 consecutively enrolled patients after the introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association between the introduction of the checklist and surgical process and outcome measures. These analyses were conducted among the pooled data, as well as for data stratified by hospital. Results: The introduction of the checklist was associated with significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of overall surgical processes and surgical outcomes. The stratified analysis presented a more nuanced result by hospital. In Hospital 1, the checklist was significantly associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes but was not associated with improved surgical outcomes. In contrast, in Hospital 2, it was significantly associated with improved surgical outcomes but was not associated with improved adherence to the composite measure of surgical processes. Conclusions: Although the implementation of a surgical safety checklist in Liberia was associated with significant improvements in processes and outcomes overall, differences at the hospital level suggest that the checklist's mechanism of improvement may be influenced by the availability of resources needed to complete recommended processes, variation in team functioning, and organizational context. Copyright 2012

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862163221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862163221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 254

EP - 260

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 6

ER -