Incentives for Offender Research Participation Are Both Ethical and Practical

R. Karl Hanson, Elizabeth J Letourneau, Mark E. Olver, Robin J. Wilson, Michael H. Miner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is little consistency in policies concerning incentives for offenders to participate in research. With nonoffenders, incentives are routine; in contrast, many jurisdictions and granting agencies prohibit offenders from receiving any external benefits. The reasons for this prohibition are unclear. Consequently, the authors reviewed the ethical and practical concerns with providing incentives to offenders. They conclude that there are no ethical principles that would justify categorically denying incentives for offenders. Research with offenders, however, presents unique practical concerns that need to be considered when determining the magnitude and form of the incentives. In general, the incentives should not be so large as to compel participation of a vulnerable population or to undermine the goals of punishment and deterrence. The authors propose that incentives for offenders should be routinely permitted, provided that they are no larger than the rewards typically available for other socially valued activities (e.g., inmate pay, minimum wage).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1391-1404
Number of pages14
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume39
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Motivation
offender
incentive
participation
Research
minimum wage
Punishment
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Vulnerable Populations
deterrence
Reward
reward
jurisdiction
penalty

Keywords

  • incentives
  • offenders
  • research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Incentives for Offender Research Participation Are Both Ethical and Practical. / Hanson, R. Karl; Letourneau, Elizabeth J; Olver, Mark E.; Wilson, Robin J.; Miner, Michael H.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 1391-1404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hanson, R. Karl ; Letourneau, Elizabeth J ; Olver, Mark E. ; Wilson, Robin J. ; Miner, Michael H. / Incentives for Offender Research Participation Are Both Ethical and Practical. In: Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 11. pp. 1391-1404.
@article{eb38297e574542c4b1243242ede2d4a4,
title = "Incentives for Offender Research Participation Are Both Ethical and Practical",
abstract = "There is little consistency in policies concerning incentives for offenders to participate in research. With nonoffenders, incentives are routine; in contrast, many jurisdictions and granting agencies prohibit offenders from receiving any external benefits. The reasons for this prohibition are unclear. Consequently, the authors reviewed the ethical and practical concerns with providing incentives to offenders. They conclude that there are no ethical principles that would justify categorically denying incentives for offenders. Research with offenders, however, presents unique practical concerns that need to be considered when determining the magnitude and form of the incentives. In general, the incentives should not be so large as to compel participation of a vulnerable population or to undermine the goals of punishment and deterrence. The authors propose that incentives for offenders should be routinely permitted, provided that they are no larger than the rewards typically available for other socially valued activities (e.g., inmate pay, minimum wage).",
keywords = "incentives, offenders, research ethics",
author = "Hanson, {R. Karl} and Letourneau, {Elizabeth J} and Olver, {Mark E.} and Wilson, {Robin J.} and Miner, {Michael H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0093854812449217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1391--1404",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incentives for Offender Research Participation Are Both Ethical and Practical

AU - Hanson, R. Karl

AU - Letourneau, Elizabeth J

AU - Olver, Mark E.

AU - Wilson, Robin J.

AU - Miner, Michael H.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - There is little consistency in policies concerning incentives for offenders to participate in research. With nonoffenders, incentives are routine; in contrast, many jurisdictions and granting agencies prohibit offenders from receiving any external benefits. The reasons for this prohibition are unclear. Consequently, the authors reviewed the ethical and practical concerns with providing incentives to offenders. They conclude that there are no ethical principles that would justify categorically denying incentives for offenders. Research with offenders, however, presents unique practical concerns that need to be considered when determining the magnitude and form of the incentives. In general, the incentives should not be so large as to compel participation of a vulnerable population or to undermine the goals of punishment and deterrence. The authors propose that incentives for offenders should be routinely permitted, provided that they are no larger than the rewards typically available for other socially valued activities (e.g., inmate pay, minimum wage).

AB - There is little consistency in policies concerning incentives for offenders to participate in research. With nonoffenders, incentives are routine; in contrast, many jurisdictions and granting agencies prohibit offenders from receiving any external benefits. The reasons for this prohibition are unclear. Consequently, the authors reviewed the ethical and practical concerns with providing incentives to offenders. They conclude that there are no ethical principles that would justify categorically denying incentives for offenders. Research with offenders, however, presents unique practical concerns that need to be considered when determining the magnitude and form of the incentives. In general, the incentives should not be so large as to compel participation of a vulnerable population or to undermine the goals of punishment and deterrence. The authors propose that incentives for offenders should be routinely permitted, provided that they are no larger than the rewards typically available for other socially valued activities (e.g., inmate pay, minimum wage).

KW - incentives

KW - offenders

KW - research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867073694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867073694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854812449217

DO - 10.1177/0093854812449217

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867073694

VL - 39

SP - 1391

EP - 1404

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 11

ER -