In-house trauma attendings

A new financial benefit for hospitals

Linda A. Dultz, H. Leon Pachter, Ronald Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is an intuitive belief that in-house trauma attendings benefit patient outcome, although multiple studies have failed to prove this. However, no studies investigate the financial advantage for hospitals by having the attendings also perform urgent general surgery cases (GSC) during nights and weekends. The purpose of this study is to identify how an in-house attending program was used for urgent GSC and to see if it provided a financial benefit to the hospital. Methods: The in-house program began in October 2007. A retrospective study reviewed all cholecystectomies performed from October 2006 to September 2007 and October 2007 to September 2008. Total length of stay (LOS) was calculated. Total LOS for each group was multiplied by the daily cost for a medical-surgical bed ($2,530.00). The cost difference was calculated for the pre- and post-in-house groups. Results: Two hundred sixty-four cholecystectomies were performed before instituting an in-house attending program compared with 291 cases in the period after a 9% increase. Total LOS for cholecystectomies performed before the program was 6.4 days translating to $16,192.00 in room costs versus 5.24 days after and $13,257.20 in room costs. This translated to a savings of $2,934.80 per patient and $854,026.80 savings in total because of reduced LOS, which subsidized the cost of the program, which was $750,000.00. Conclusion: In-house attendings are beneficial in decreasing overall LOS for urgent GSC. This study demonstrates that in-house attendings can perform urgent GSCs and realize a savings for a hospital that can be used to fully subsidize the cost of the program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1032-1035
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume68
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Length of Stay
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Cholecystectomy
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • In-house trauma attending

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

In-house trauma attendings : A new financial benefit for hospitals. / Dultz, Linda A.; Pachter, H. Leon; Simon, Ronald.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 68, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 1032-1035.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dultz, Linda A. ; Pachter, H. Leon ; Simon, Ronald. / In-house trauma attendings : A new financial benefit for hospitals. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2010 ; Vol. 68, No. 5. pp. 1032-1035.
@article{42ebc2448347473bac329ab90711b3d8,
title = "In-house trauma attendings: A new financial benefit for hospitals",
abstract = "Background: There is an intuitive belief that in-house trauma attendings benefit patient outcome, although multiple studies have failed to prove this. However, no studies investigate the financial advantage for hospitals by having the attendings also perform urgent general surgery cases (GSC) during nights and weekends. The purpose of this study is to identify how an in-house attending program was used for urgent GSC and to see if it provided a financial benefit to the hospital. Methods: The in-house program began in October 2007. A retrospective study reviewed all cholecystectomies performed from October 2006 to September 2007 and October 2007 to September 2008. Total length of stay (LOS) was calculated. Total LOS for each group was multiplied by the daily cost for a medical-surgical bed ($2,530.00). The cost difference was calculated for the pre- and post-in-house groups. Results: Two hundred sixty-four cholecystectomies were performed before instituting an in-house attending program compared with 291 cases in the period after a 9{\%} increase. Total LOS for cholecystectomies performed before the program was 6.4 days translating to $16,192.00 in room costs versus 5.24 days after and $13,257.20 in room costs. This translated to a savings of $2,934.80 per patient and $854,026.80 savings in total because of reduced LOS, which subsidized the cost of the program, which was $750,000.00. Conclusion: In-house attendings are beneficial in decreasing overall LOS for urgent GSC. This study demonstrates that in-house attendings can perform urgent GSCs and realize a savings for a hospital that can be used to fully subsidize the cost of the program.",
keywords = "Cholecystectomy, Cost-effectiveness, In-house trauma attending",
author = "Dultz, {Linda A.} and Pachter, {H. Leon} and Ronald Simon",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d86471",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1032--1035",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-house trauma attendings

T2 - A new financial benefit for hospitals

AU - Dultz, Linda A.

AU - Pachter, H. Leon

AU - Simon, Ronald

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Background: There is an intuitive belief that in-house trauma attendings benefit patient outcome, although multiple studies have failed to prove this. However, no studies investigate the financial advantage for hospitals by having the attendings also perform urgent general surgery cases (GSC) during nights and weekends. The purpose of this study is to identify how an in-house attending program was used for urgent GSC and to see if it provided a financial benefit to the hospital. Methods: The in-house program began in October 2007. A retrospective study reviewed all cholecystectomies performed from October 2006 to September 2007 and October 2007 to September 2008. Total length of stay (LOS) was calculated. Total LOS for each group was multiplied by the daily cost for a medical-surgical bed ($2,530.00). The cost difference was calculated for the pre- and post-in-house groups. Results: Two hundred sixty-four cholecystectomies were performed before instituting an in-house attending program compared with 291 cases in the period after a 9% increase. Total LOS for cholecystectomies performed before the program was 6.4 days translating to $16,192.00 in room costs versus 5.24 days after and $13,257.20 in room costs. This translated to a savings of $2,934.80 per patient and $854,026.80 savings in total because of reduced LOS, which subsidized the cost of the program, which was $750,000.00. Conclusion: In-house attendings are beneficial in decreasing overall LOS for urgent GSC. This study demonstrates that in-house attendings can perform urgent GSCs and realize a savings for a hospital that can be used to fully subsidize the cost of the program.

AB - Background: There is an intuitive belief that in-house trauma attendings benefit patient outcome, although multiple studies have failed to prove this. However, no studies investigate the financial advantage for hospitals by having the attendings also perform urgent general surgery cases (GSC) during nights and weekends. The purpose of this study is to identify how an in-house attending program was used for urgent GSC and to see if it provided a financial benefit to the hospital. Methods: The in-house program began in October 2007. A retrospective study reviewed all cholecystectomies performed from October 2006 to September 2007 and October 2007 to September 2008. Total length of stay (LOS) was calculated. Total LOS for each group was multiplied by the daily cost for a medical-surgical bed ($2,530.00). The cost difference was calculated for the pre- and post-in-house groups. Results: Two hundred sixty-four cholecystectomies were performed before instituting an in-house attending program compared with 291 cases in the period after a 9% increase. Total LOS for cholecystectomies performed before the program was 6.4 days translating to $16,192.00 in room costs versus 5.24 days after and $13,257.20 in room costs. This translated to a savings of $2,934.80 per patient and $854,026.80 savings in total because of reduced LOS, which subsidized the cost of the program, which was $750,000.00. Conclusion: In-house attendings are beneficial in decreasing overall LOS for urgent GSC. This study demonstrates that in-house attendings can perform urgent GSCs and realize a savings for a hospital that can be used to fully subsidize the cost of the program.

KW - Cholecystectomy

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - In-house trauma attending

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952254046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952254046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d86471

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d86471

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 1032

EP - 1035

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -