TY - JOUR
T1 - In Defense of a Modular Architecture for the Number-Processing System
T2 - Reply to Campbell and Clark
AU - Sokol, Scott M.
AU - Goodman-Schulman, Roberta
AU - McCloskey, Michael
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1989/3
Y1 - 1989/3
N2 - In several recent articles we have developed a model of the cognitive number-processing and calculation systems. Campbell and Clark (1988), commenting on one of these articles (McCloskey, Sokol, & Goodman, 1986), called into question our model's assumption of a modular functional architecture and a single form of internal numerical representation. Campbell and Clark proposed as an alternative a nonmodular encoding-complex view. In this reply we discuss the results offered by Campbell and Clark as evidence against our model, arguing that several of these results are in fact consistent with the model and that the remaining results, while raising significant issues, by no means justify abandonment of the modular framework and the constraints it imposes. We also point out that whereas our model provides specific, well-motivated interpretations for a substantial body of empirical findings, the encoding-complex view is so underspecified and unconstrained as to be vacuous.
AB - In several recent articles we have developed a model of the cognitive number-processing and calculation systems. Campbell and Clark (1988), commenting on one of these articles (McCloskey, Sokol, & Goodman, 1986), called into question our model's assumption of a modular functional architecture and a single form of internal numerical representation. Campbell and Clark proposed as an alternative a nonmodular encoding-complex view. In this reply we discuss the results offered by Campbell and Clark as evidence against our model, arguing that several of these results are in fact consistent with the model and that the remaining results, while raising significant issues, by no means justify abandonment of the modular framework and the constraints it imposes. We also point out that whereas our model provides specific, well-motivated interpretations for a substantial body of empirical findings, the encoding-complex view is so underspecified and unconstrained as to be vacuous.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024635787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024635787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.105
DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.105
M3 - Article
C2 - 2522503
AN - SCOPUS:0024635787
SN - 0096-3445
VL - 118
SP - 105
EP - 110
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
IS - 1
ER -